LCQ21: Ensuring the safety of external chargers

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

     Following is a question by the Hon Elaine Chik and a written reply by the Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development, Mr Algernon Yau, in the Legislative Council today (May 13):

Question:

LCQ13: Measures to cope with rising fuel prices

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

     Following is a question by the Hon Adrian Ho and a written reply by the Secretary for Environment and Ecology, Mr Tse Chin-wan, in the Legislative Council today (May 13):

Question:

LCQ17: Supporting the elderly in using eHealth

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

LCQ17: Supporting the elderly in using eHealth 

Function     The Government has been actively promoting and facilitating citizens’ registration with and use of eHealth, with special arrangements made through various online and offline channels to assist the elderly and other persons in need. At present, Hong Kong residents can register with eHealth online and use “iAM Smart” for identity verification to set up their eHealth accounts. Citizens can also register in person at 63 registration centres under the HA or the Department of Health (DH), or set up their eHealth accounts at designated post offices in 18 districts across Hong Kong. We have also deployed mobile registration teams to visit hospitals and clinics under the HA or the DH to assist citizens in registering with and using eHealth.

     To support elderly persons who have limited mobility or are less accustomed to using online services, we have partnered with various units to help them download the eHealth App and understand the relevant functions. Among others, we collaborated with the District Services and Community Care Teams across 18 districts under the Home Affairs Department to set up “e+Support Stations” at community events and conduct home visits. We also provided technical support and training through the “Smart Silver” Digital Inclusion Programme for Elders under the Digital Policy Office (DPO). Furthermore, we plan to launch the eHealth+ Intergeneration Inclusion Pilot Scheme this year in collaboration with non-governmental organisations, secondary schools, and elderly centres, under which students will serve as mentors to teach the elderly how to use the eHealth App.Issued at HKT 12:20

NNNN

London ETO supports Hong Kong artisans at London Craft Week

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

London ETO supports Hong Kong artisans at London Craft Week       
     This exhibition showcases a collection of craft works through a fresh and contemporary lens, bringing together the exquisite craftsmanship of traditional artisans and the innovative ideas of emerging designers, demonstrating the creative synergy generated through cross-generation collaboration.
      
     The Director-General of the London ETO, Miss Fiona Chau, welcomed the opportunity to support Crafts on Peel in showcasing its work once again at London Craft Week. She remarked, “The exhibition offers a compelling fusion of time-honoured traditions and forward-looking innovation, vividly reflecting the creative spirit of Hong Kong.”
      
     The “Creative Cross-Pollination: The Future of Crafts” exhibition is being held at the Royal Society of Sculptors (108 Old Brompton Rd, London SW7 3RA) from May 11 to 17 (London time). 
Issued at HKT 6:05

NNNN

LCQ9: Measures to optimise initial public offering market

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region – 4

     Following is a question by the Hon Robert Lee and a written reply by the Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury, Mr Christopher Hui, in the Legislative Council today (May 13):
 
Question:
 
     There are views that although the initial public offering (IPO) market has been buoyant recently, the success rate in subscribing for IPO shares by retail investors remains on the low side, and that there is room for further improvement in the pricing and allocation mechanisms for new listings. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
 
(1) given that the Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited (HKEX) implemented in August 2025 a series of optimisation measures regarding IPO price discovery and open market, which included adjusting the clawback allocation to the public subscription tranche, whether the authorities are aware if the HKEX has conducted a comparative analysis of the post-listing share price volatility and performance, as well as the proportion of IPO shares allocated to retail investors before and after the implementation of the new requirements; if not, of the reasons for that;
 
(2) whether the authorities will urge the HKEX to review the effectiveness of the optimised clawback mechanism for IPO shares, and study the introduction of an open competitive bidding mechanism for IPO shares to allow all investors (except cornerstone investors) to participate in bidding before the listing of IPO shares, so as to enhance the fairness of IPO allocation; if not, of the reasons for that;
 
(3) in reply to my question on November 15, 2023, the authorities indicated that the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) had advised the Hong Kong Institute of Certified Public Accountants to provide guidelines to its members on the accounting method of IPO subscription and the computation of liquid capital where necessary; whether the authorities have since co-ordinated with the SFC and accounting professional bodies to provide clear and uniform guidance to the industry; if so, of the progress of the relevant work; and
 
(4) whether it knows if the relevant regulatory bodies will, by comparing the regulatory regimes of other markets, review Practice Note 21 of the Listing Rules concerning the due diligence performed by sponsors and avoid overly stringent regulations, so as to reduce unnecessary due diligence work, thereby lowering the listing costs of enterprises; if not, of the reasons for that?
 
Reply:
 
President,
 
     With Hong Kong being a major global listing platform, the Government has been driving the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) and Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited (HKEX) to enhance Hong Kong’s listing regime continuously, with a view to maintaining international competitiveness and attracting more quality enterprises to list in Hong Kong.
 
     In consultation with the SFC and the HKEX, the reply to the four parts of the question is as follows:
 
(1) and (2) To strengthen the robustness of the pricing and allocation mechanism for new shares, the HKEX implemented the enhanced initial public offering (IPO) allocation and pricing mechanism in August 2025 following market consultation. Notably, the HKEX requires issuers to allocate at least 40 per cent of the initial allocation of offer shares to the bookbuilding placing tranche at IPO, while issuers may select the allocation mechanism for the public subscription tranche (i.e. Mechanism A or Mechanism B (Note 1)) according to their needs. The arrangement aims to increase the participation of price-setting investors, thereby improving the price discovery process and ensuring that the regime aligns with international market standards, while accommodating the business characteristics and funding needs of different issuers as well as market conditions to attract more quality companies to list in the capital market in Hong Kong. In addition, the proportion of institutional investors in market trading has risen significantly in recent years as compared with the 1990s when the clawback mechanism was introduced. Taking into account the evolving investor composition participating in the market, the new arrangement also balances the demand of different types of local and international investors in subscribing for IPO shares.
 
     Since the implementation of the new requirements in August 2025, as at end April 2026, more than 80 out of the 109 IPOs recorded share prices that either rose or remained unchanged on the first trading day, representing close to 80 per cent of the total which is higher than around 70 per cent prior to the implementation of the new requirements. Apart from 12 cases adopting the bespoke mechanism applicable to Specialist Technology Companies (Note 2), two adopted Mechanism A (with final allocation to the public subscription tranche at 35 per cent), while 95 adopted Mechanism B (with an initial allocation of 10 per cent to the public subscription tranche, and final allocation ranging between 10 per cent and 15 per cent (Note 3)). As issuers may determine the allocation mechanism for public subscription having regard to their business circumstances, industry characteristics and prevailing market conditions under the new mechanism, the arrangements for individual issuers’ IPOs vary. The overall allocation ratio at different times is therefore not directly comparable.
 
     In implementing the enhanced IPO pricing and allocation mechanism, the HKEX has taken into account the needs of different investors (including those in the public subscription tranche). The new mechanism strikes a reasonable balance between ensuring meaningful participation by price-setting investors in IPOs and maintaining retail investor involvement, including ensuring a bookbuilding placing tranche of a meaningful size that helps enhance price discovery to benefit all investors participating in IPOs. As the participation of independent institutional investors can contribute to more robust price discovery, we note that major global markets generally adopt the bookbuilding placing mechanism for IPOs and public offerings conducted by way of open bidding are very limited. The Government, together with the SFC and the HKEX, will continue to closely monitor the implementation of the new requirements as well as the effectiveness of the relevant pricing and allocation mechanisms, and will keep track of international market developments and local market needs to ensure the healthy development of the local market.
 
(3) Regarding the accounting treatment of IPO subscriptions and calculation of liquid capital, the Government has co-ordinated the SFC and the Hong Kong Institute of Certified Public Accountants (HKICPA) to actively engage with the securities industry to understand brokers’ arrangements in relation to IPO subscription business, including workflow, funding preparation and financial calculations. Notably, the SFC raised issues concerning accounting treatment of IPO subscriptions with its Securities Regulatory Advisory Panel at a meeting with the HKICPA in October 2023, and acknowledged that licensed corporations have different operating models resulting in variations in accounting treatment. The SFC issued a circular in November 2023 reminding licensed corporations to record all assets and liabilities in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in a manner that reflects the actual transactions and arrangements, and to calculate liquid capital based on such records in compliance with the Securities and Futures (Financial Resources) Rules (the Rules).
 
     The SFC subsequently issued another circular on IPO matters in March 2025, introducing the requirement of collecting a minimum of 10 per cent upfront subscription deposits. Generally speaking, when a licensed corporation provides IPO financing to clients and collects the minimum upfront subscription deposits in accordance with the circular, the receivable arising from such financing may be included as liquid assets under section 21(5) of the Rules.
 
     If individual licensed corporations and their accountants or auditors have any questions regarding the calculation of liquid capital or other relevant provisions in the circular, the SFC may communicate and follow up on their specific circumstances.
 
(4) As an international equity market, both market facilitation and quality are equally important. In respect of listing applications, the primary role of sponsors is to ensure that listing applicants comply with the Listing Rules and other applicable laws and regulatory requirements, and that listing documents provide sufficient details and information to enable investors to fully understand the listing applicants’ business, financial position, profitability and associated risks. The gatekeeping role of sponsors in the listing process is crucial to maintaining the quality of Hong Kong’s market and investor confidence in the IPO market. Under the requirements of the Hong Kong laws, only licensed corporations that are licensed by the SFC to carry out Type 6 regulated activity (advising on corporate finance) and meet the eligibility criteria set out in the Sponsor Guidelines may act as listing sponsors.
 
     To gain a thorough understanding of listing applicants and ensure compliance with the regulatory requirements, sponsors should adopt reasonable due diligence procedures in respect of listing applications. In conducting due diligence inquiries, sponsors must have regard to paragraph 17 of the Code of Conduct for Persons Licensed by or Registered with the SFC (the Code of Conduct) and the Practice Note 21 of the Listing Rules (the Practice Note). The Code of Conduct provides guidance that sponsors should exercise reasonable judgement, having regard to all relevant facts and circumstances, on the nature and scope of due diligence based on the facts and circumstances. To this end, the HKEX sets out its expectations of sponsors’ general due diligence practices in the Practice Note. However, as each listing applicant is unique, sponsors must determine the appropriate scope and extent of due diligence for each case.
 
     In fact, with the significant increase in new listing applications in 2025, the SFC and the HKEX have observed a decline in the quality of draft listing documents. Accordingly, they issued a joint letter to relevant sponsors in December 2025 highlighting matters requiring attention (including the quality of listing application documents and sponsors’ resources). The SFC subsequently issued a circular in January 2026 expressing concern over serious deficiencies in certain listing documents and sub-standard conduct by some sponsors. The SFC is currently reviewing the documents and information submitted by sponsors pursuant to the circular, and has commenced thematic inspections of sponsors.
 
     The SFC and the HKEX will continue to closely review sponsors’ work and the quality of listing applications, and will take appropriate regulatory action where necessary to uphold Hong Kong’s reputation as a leading international fundraising centre.
 
Note 1: Under Mechanism A, issuers will set the initial allocation ratio to the public subscription tranche at 5 per cent. If over-subscription for the public tranche reaches 15 times or above, the allocation ratio is 15 per cent; if over-subscription for the public tranche reaches 50 times or above, the allocation ratio is 25 per cent; if over-subscription is 100 times or above, the allocation ratio is 35 per cent. Under Mechanism B, issuers pre-select an allocation percentage to the public subscription tranche with a minimum of 10 per cent (and a maximum of 60 per cent) of the offer shares, but without a clawback mechanism.
 
Note 2: Under the bespoke mechanism for Specialist Technology Companies, the initial allocation ratio to the public subscription tranche is 5 per cent. If over-subscription for the public tranche reaches 10 times or above, the allocation ratio is 10 per cent; if over-subscription reaches 50 times or above, the allocation ratio is 20 per cent.
 
Note 3: Final allocation percentages are calculated based on the total number of shares initially on offer.

SCST concludes visit to Bordeaux

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region – 4

     The Secretary for Culture, Sports and Tourism, Miss Rosanna Law, concluded her visit to Bordeaux, France, during which she reinforced Hong Kong’s position as Asia’s premier events capital, and as a key partner in wine trading and tourism.

     On May 12 (Bordeaux time), Miss Law met with representatives of the Bordeaux Chamber of Commerce and Industries to learn about the latest developments of the Great Wine Capitals Global Network, an exclusive alliance of 11 renowned international cities and wine regions. The two sides exchanged views on best practices for organising international events and wine tourism in the new era. Miss Law reiterated that Hong Kong remains a unique East-meet-West centre, enabling the city to be the hub and the bridge for winemakers to reach the burgeoning markets of the Chinese Mainland and the wider Asia-Pacific region.

     Miss Law also visited the Museum of Decorative Arts and Design (MADD) in Bordeaux’s historic district. Much like Tai Kwun in Hong Kong, MADD is housed in two historic monuments, an 18th-century mansion and a 19th-century former municipal prison, providing visitors with a unique experience. MADD is one of the few French museums to devote its entire programme to decorative arts, crafts, and design.

     Miss Law will depart for Hong Kong on the morning of May 13 (Bordeaux time).

     

Toll waiver for commercial vehicles to take effect from May 17 for two months

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region – 4

     The Inter-departmental Task Force on Monitoring Fuel Supply today (May 13) announced that the Government will waive 50 per cent of the toll for all commercial vehicles (including buses, goods vehicles, light buses and taxis as registered under records of the Transport Department (TD)) using all government tolled tunnels and the Tsing Sha Control Area from 0.00am on May 17 (Sunday), excluding private cars and motor cycles/motor tricycles. The temporary measure will last for two months until 11.59pm on July 16 (Thursday). The Government will publish relevant notices in the Gazette on May 15.

     The Task Force said that the targeted temporary measure aims to alleviate the operating costs of various types of commercial vehicles, and assist drivers and operators in coping with the pressure arising from rising fuel prices.

     The TD has steered the toll service provider to adjust the HKeToll system to ensure smooth implementation. Commercial vehicle owners are not required to submit any application; they only need to pay the reduced amount as displayed in the system. The payment methods and time limits designated by existing legislation remain unchanged. In addition, taxi passengers are reminded that they must continue to pay the statutory tolls in full during the waiver period.

     Commercial vehicle drivers can obtain the waiver details via the HKeToll and HKeMobility mobile apps, toll information displays, variable message signs on major trunk roads, tunnel radio break-in messages and letters issued by the TD to the trades concerned. During this period, placards will be displayed in taxi compartments to remind passengers to pay tolls in full.

LCQ11: Strengthening regulatory oversight of employment agencies for foreign domestic helpers

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

LCQ11: Strengthening regulatory oversight of employment agencies for foreign domestic helpers 
Question:
 
     It is reported that according to the latest announcement by the Consumer Council (the Council), the Council has received a total of 391 complaints against employment agencies (EAs) for foreign domestic helpers (FDHs) since 2023, including cases where FDHs failed to report for duty as scheduled and instances where their competence did not meet expectations. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
 
(1) of the following information regarding EAs in each of the past three years (set out in a table): 

(i) the number of complaints received against EAs and the year-on-year rates of change (broken down by nature of complaint); and  
President,
 
     The Labour Department (LD) enforces Part XII of the Employment Ordinance (EO), the Employment Agency Regulations and the Code of Practice for Employment Agencies (CoP), and regulates employment agencies (EAs) in Hong Kong through license administration, inspections, complaint investigation and prosecution, so as to protect the rights of job seekers and employers.
 
     The reply to the Member’s question is set out below:

Complaint items(+13.6%)(+12.0%)(-27.9%)(+51.6%)(-0.7%)(+39.3%)(-11.8%)(+1.5%)(-5.2%)(+27.3%)

 (+175%)(-54.5%) 
(2) and (3) EAs are required to operate in accordance with the law and abide by the CoP issued by the LD. The CoP sets out the legislative requirements that EAs must observe and the standards which the Commissioner for Labour expects EAs to meet, such as maintaining transparency in business operations, drawing up written service agreements with job seekers and employers, providing payment receipts, and avoiding involvement in the financial affairs of job seekers, etc. If the licensee of an EA, or a related person of or an individual employed by the licensee fails to comply with the CoP, the LD may refuse to issue or renew a licence, or may revoke the licence of the EA under EO.
 
     To further enhance the professionalism and service quality of EAs, the LD promulgated the revised CoP in May 2024, introducing additional requirements expected of EAs by the Commissioner for Labour, which include that EAs must specify in the written service agreements drawn up with job seekers and employers the scope of services, the fees charged on each service item, payment arrangements, etc, and clearly state whether the EAs will provide a refund or arrangements for replacement of foreign domestic helpers (FDH) in case the EAs’ services are not delivered in full or if the FDHs prematurely terminate the employment contracts. These revisions enhance the transparency of service fees charged by EAs and strengthen the protection of the rights of employers as customers. In the course of revising the CoP, relevant organisations (including the Consumer Council) had been consulted.
 
     The CoP requires EAs, when providing services to job seekers and employers, to exercise due diligence in verifying the information provided by both parties, and ensure that any information provided to both sides is consistent with the facts known to the EAs. When charging service fees to employers, EAs must make sure that the job applicants referred to employers meet the qualifications and other requirements listed by the employers. In addition, EAs should exercise professional judgment in selecting any business partners within and outside Hong Kong, and consider the reliability of information on job seekers provided by their business partner(s) located outside Hong Kong, including but not limited to the job seekers’ academic qualifications, skills, training received, etc.
 
     Job seekers and employers should compare the services and fees offered by different EAs and choose the EAs that suit their needs. They should carefully read and understand relevant terms before signing the service agreements. If unreasonable terms are spotted in the service agreements, they should refuse to sign and, where necessary, seek assistance from the Customs and Excise Department, the Consumer Council or the LD.

(4) To enhance transparency of the past records of EAs, the LD’s Employment Agencies Portal not only uploads information on EAs with valid licences, but also publishes records of EAs that have been convicted of overcharging commissions or unlicensed operation, have had their licences revoked or renewal refused, and have been issued written warnings. This facilitates the public in making informed decisions when engaging EA services, avoiding impairment of their rights.
 
     The LD has also established regular liaison mechanism with the consulates-general of major FDH-sending countries in Hong Kong to strengthen collaboration and exchange of information on unscrupulous EAs with a view to ensuring the rights of employers and FDHs are fully protected. If malpractices by organisations outside Hong Kong in arranging FDHs to take up employment in Hong Kong are identified, the LD will reflect the matter to relevant governments concerned through the liaison mechanism and request appropriate follow-up actions.Issued at HKT 11:35

NNNN