LCQ22: Promoting mutual access in terms of asset and wealth management

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

Following is a question by the Hon Robert Lee and a written reply by the Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury, Mr Christopher Hui, in the Legislative Council today (July 8):

Question:

The National 15th Five-Year Plan clearly supports Hong Kong in strengthening its functions as an international asset and wealth management centre. There are views that there is room for further improvement in the Mainland-Hong Kong Mutual Recognition of Funds arrangement, operation of the Integrated Fund Platform under the Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited (HKEX), as well as the sales and promotion arrangements under the Cross-boundary Wealth Management Connect (Cross-boundary WMC) Scheme in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area, in order to facilitate development of the asset and wealth management industry in Hong Kong. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:

(1) whether the Government will step up negotiations with the Mainland regulatory authorities to further increase the number of funds mutually recognised between the Mainland and Hong Kong, so as to cover all funds authorised by the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC);

(2) whether it will study the establishment of a dedicated committee and engagement of industry players to jointly review and enhance the operation of HKEX’s Integrated Fund Platform; and urge HKEX to expedite expansion of the services provided by the Platform to include one-stop services such as fund trading (including funds authorised by SFC), settlement and analysis;

(3) given that the Hong Kong Monetary Authority introduced enhancement measures for the Cross-boundary WMC Scheme last year, including the establishment of the “Three-party Online Conference”, to facilitate promotion and sales efforts under the Southbound Scheme, whether the Government will, against this background, further discuss with the Mainland authorities the implementation of relaxation measures to allow financial services practitioners in the Mainland and Hong Kong to have direct mutual market access under a system of mutual recognition of licenses so that they can conduct offline product sales and promotion with physical presence in both markets;

(4) whether it will explore with the Mainland further expansion of the scope of investment products under the Cross-boundary WMC Scheme and the enhancement of efficiency of the relevant approval process; and whether it will consider enhancing the relevant measures under the Cross-boundary WMC Scheme to encourage Mainland securities dealers to collaborate with more securities dealers in Hong Kong; if so, of the details; and

(5) given that the Pilot Programme to Enhance Talent Training for the Asset and Wealth Management Sector had concluded at the end of March this year, whether the Government will consider relaunching and regularising the Programme, with a view to continuously nurturing more relevant talents to address the development needs of the industry?

Reply:

President,

The National 15th Five-Year Plan clearly supports strengthening Hong Kong’s functions as an international asset and wealth management centre. The Government has been working in concert with the financial industry to continuously improve the financial infrastructure and ecosystem, enrich investment products and risk management tools, and deepen the mutual access with capital markets of different places. These measures have been bearing fruit. According to the Asset and Wealth Management Activities Survey 2025 just published by the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), Hong Kong’s assets under management in 2025 jumped 20 per cent year-on-year to a record high of $42.2 trillion, with net fund inflow surging 193 per cent year-on-year to $2.1 trillion. In addition, Hong Kong has become the world’s largest cross-boundary wealth management centre and it is projected that, from 2025 to 2030, the cross-boundary wealth managed by Hong Kong will grow by 9 per cent on average annually, maintaining first place globally. To maintain the strong growth momentum, the Government recently introduced a bill to the Legislative Council on June 24 for further enhancing the preferential tax regimes for funds, single family offices and carried interest, with a view to attracting more global capital to be managed in Hong Kong.

In consultation with the SFC, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority and the Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited (HKEX), the reply to the various parts of the question is as follows:

(1) The Government is committed to enhancing the mutual market access mechanism with the Mainland. The Mainland-Hong Kong Mutual Recognition of Funds arrangement (the Arrangement) was launched in July 2015, where eligible Mainland and Hong Kong funds can be offered to retail investors in each other’s market through a streamlined vetting process. The regulators of the two places implemented enhancement measures starting from January 1, 2025, which include relaxing the sales restriction of mutual recognition funds in the other market and allowing Hong Kong mutual recognition funds (i.e. Hong Kong funds authorised to be offered in the Mainland market) to delegate investment management functions to overseas asset management companies within the same group. The measures enhanced the flexibility and scale of the Arrangement, where a total of 85 funds were authorised by the regulators of the two places as of end-May 2026. In 2025, the net subscription amount of Hong Kong mutual recognition funds on the Mainland reached RMB82.5 billion, representing a 2.3-fold increase year-on-year.

The SFC has been maintaining close communication with local fund managers to encourage them to actively participate in the Arrangement, having regard to factors such as their business development plans. The Government and regulators will continue discussions with Mainland counterparts on different enhancement measures for the mutual market access mechanism to support market development.

(2) The Integrated Fund Platform (IFP) established by HKEX has been well received by the fund industry since its launch. The IFP introduced earlier the “Fund Repository” providing a one-stop information portal for investors to access key details on funds authorised by the SFC, as well as the “Order Routing Service” enhancing connectivity between market participants of all sizes across the fund value chain to elevate operational efficiencies in fund distribution. As at end-May 2026, the IFP has successfully attracted 55 financial institutions, including fund houses, distributors and transfer agents.

The IFP is expected to launch the “Platform and Nominee Services” in the second half of 2026, expanding its services to include the provision of nominee services, as well as the facilitation of payments and settlement, so as to enhance market efficiency and lower transaction costs. During the planning, preparation and operation of the IFP, HKEX as always will continue to maintain close communication with regulators and industry stakeholders to enhance the efficiency of the IFP and promote broader industry participation in the platform.

(3) and (4) Cross-boundary Wealth Management Connect (WMC) in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA) provides GBA residents with a formal, direct and convenient channel for cross-boundary investment in diverse wealth management products and marks a milestone in the financial development of the GBA.

Regarding mutual recognition of professional qualifications with the Mainland, for the securities and futures sector, the SFC and the China Securities Regulatory Commission have implemented an arrangement for mutual recognition of professional qualifications, and simplified the relevant procedures for obtaining securities practising registration and applying for the futures or fund practising qualifications on the Mainland. Hong Kong professionals with relevant licence issued by the SFC only need to pass the Mainland’s examination on the relevant laws and regulations; the examination on the foundation paper is not required. For the banking sector, the Hong Kong Institute of Bankers and the China Banking Association signed the Memorandum of Understanding on Mutual Recognition of Personal Wealth Management Qualification Certificates (MoU) in 2009, officially launching the mutual recognition mechanism. Subsequently, the two sides signed addendums in 2010, 2015 and 2022 to improve the relevant arrangements. Under the MoU, financial practitioners from the Mainland and Hong Kong can obtain “dual qualifications” (Level 1 of Qualification Certificate of Banking Professional in the Mainland and the Associate Retail Wealth Professional in Hong Kong) through the mutual recognition mechanism. Hong Kong will continue to examine enhancement measures with Mainland regulators to explore ways of broadening Hong Kong professionals’ entry into the Mainland market, thereby increasing the flexibility in the provision of human capital for the Mainland and Hong Kong markets.

As an innovative financial co-operation measure in the GBA involving three different regulatory systems of the Mainland, Hong Kong and Macao, the WMC has been implemented under a pilot approach in a gradual and incremental manner. Under the current regulations on the Mainland, Mainland brokers are already allowed to collaborate with multiple Hong Kong brokers to participate in the WMC. Regarding the product scope, “WMC 2.0” has also scoped in (1) all non-complex funds domiciled in Hong Kong, authorised by the SFC and primarily investing in Greater China equity (with no limitation on risk ratings), (2) other low- to medium-high-risk funds (excluding single emerging market equity funds and high-yield bond funds), (3) low- to medium-risk and non-complex bonds, etc.

Following the launch of “WMC 2.0” in February 2024, the number of Mainland investors investing in Hong Kong’s wealth products has increased from about 25 000 to about 126 000. As of end-May 2026, over 181 000 individual investors participated in the WMC, and cross-boundary fund remittances (including Guangdong, Hong Kong and Macao) totalled over RMB138 billion. The Government and the financial regulators will closely monitor market developments and the operation of the WMC, maintain close communication, regularly review the implementation of “WMC 2.0”, and explore further enhancement measures with Mainland regulatory authorities.

(5) The Pilot Programme to Enhance Talent Training for the Asset and Wealth Management Sector was implemented from August 2016 to March 2026. Under the Pilot Programme, over 1 130 tertiary students completed internships, and 5 700 subsidy applications for eligible course fees were approved. The Pilot Programme effectively prompted the industry in offering a variety of professional training courses and student internship opportunities, thereby enhancing the professional competence of practitioners and laying the foundation for talent training and development in the asset and wealth management sector. The Government will continue to work closely with the industry to review the talent development policy and measures in light of market needs.

Ends/Wednesday, July 8, 2026
Issued at HKT 14:58
NNNN

LCQ1: Promoting high-quality development of tourism industry

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

Following is a question by the Hon Jonathan Stuart Lamport and a reply by the Secretary for Culture, Sports and Tourism, Miss Rosanna Law, in the Legislative Council today (July 8):

Question:

The Government is vigorously developing the mega event economy to promote the development of the tourism industry. However, while the number of visitor arrivals increased by 12 per cent year-on-year last year, the increase in overnight visitors was only 6 per cent. There are views that although the ancillary facilities for cross-boundary transport following mega events facilitate travel for visitors, they also encourage visitors to depart immediately after the events, thereby preventing the mega event economy from transforming into actual economic benefits. Regarding promoting the high-quality development of the tourism industry, will the Government inform this Council:

(1) of the expenditure and revenue for each mega economic event organised or subsidised by the Government in the past three years, as well as the details of the per capita spending in Hong Kong by overnight and same-day visitors participating in these events; whether it has assessed the actual economic impact on local sectors, such as catering, retail and hotel, caused by the large number of visitors who do not stay overnight after participating in mega events;

(2) of the ways to promote the high-quality development of Hong Kong’s tourism industry, ensuring that the visitor flows generated by the mega event economy can effectively transform into commercial dividends, so that sectors such as catering, retail, hotel, public transport and various leisure experiences can benefit comprehensively; and

(3) given that the Government has been vigorously exploring international tourism in recent years, and it is learnt that foreign investors are considering building hotels on outlying islands to develop a resort destination similar to Bali in Indonesia, whether the Government will consider providing assistance?

Reply:

Thank you, President.

Mega events are a vital engine driving Hong Kong’s tourism and economic development. On the one hand, mega events directly attract visitors to Hong Kong, boosting consumption in sectors such as hotels, catering, and retail; on the other hand, they create employment opportunities in industries such as transport, logistics, and event production. The benefits of mega event economy should not be measured solely by whether visitors stay overnight. Even if some visitors arrive and depart on the same day, they generate actual spending on transport, catering, and experiential activities, etc, thereby driving the development of the entire industry chain. In particular, since its opening last year, the Kai Tak Sports Park (KTSP) has achieved a critical breakthrough for “Mega Events + Tourism”. To date, the Kai Tak Stadium has hosted over 60 major sports events and concerts, attracting over 2.4 million spectators, effectively driving surrounding consumption and employment, and injecting tangible momentum into the local economy. The continuous rise in visitor arrivals also reflects the success of the “Mega Events + Tourism” strategy. In the first half of 2026, visitor arrivals to Hong Kong reached about 26.71 million, representing a year-on-year increase of 13 per cent, with Mainland and non-Mainland visitors increasing by 16 per cent and 5 per cent year-on-year respectively.

In response to the Hon Jonathan Stuart Lamport’s question, my reply is as follows:

(1) In recent years, the Government, in collaboration with the Hong Kong Tourism Board (HKTB), has promoted various mega events to foster the integrated development of culture, sports, and tourism. Over the past three years, the “M” Mark System and the Mega Arts and Cultural Events Fund have supported a total of 95 events, involving an amount of approximately $1,125.04 million. The HKTB will also continue to enhance the scale of its six flagship events and introduce new elements to attract more visitors to Hong Kong.

Regarding visitor spending, there is a structural shift in visitor consumption patterns, moving from a previous focus on shopping to a greater emphasis on culture and experiences. In recent years, the per capita spending of overnight and same-day visitors remained at levels of over $5,000 and $1,000 respectively. In 2025, the per capita spending of overnight visitors rose slightly from $5,490 in 2024 to $5,503, and it is expected to increase slightly to $5,530 in 2026. For same-day visitors, per capita spending was adjusted from $1,235 in 2024 to $1,139 in 2025, and is expected to remain at a similar level in 2026. Although some visitors attending mega events do not stay overnight, they still spend on transport, catering, and entertainment. Taking the KTSP as an example, each event can create nearly 10 000 temporary jobs, and the actual economic contribution far exceeds ticket revenues and visitor spending. Benefiting from the robust growth in visitor arrivals, the tourism expenditure associated to inbound tourism in 2025 rose by 13 per cent over the previous year to $217.5 billion, and is expected to further increase by about 10 per cent to $238.1 billion in 2026.

(2) In response to changing visitor travel patterns, we are adopting a “Mega Events+” strategy to promote high-quality tourism development. Mega events are upgraded from standalone items into cross-period, cross-district themed experiences, with a view to extending visitors’ stay in Hong Kong and broadening consumption scenarios so that catering, retail, hotels, and transport can all benefit. Taking the Hong Kong Rugby Sevens this year as an example, the three-day event attracted over 113 000 spectators, with over 30 per cent being non-local visitors. In the same week, the Tradition HKFC 10s and the “Racing with Rugby” activities at Happy Valley Racecourse were also held. Complemented by city-wide celebrations and catering discounts, this successfully stimulated the surrounding economy. On cultural mega events, “Art March” this year linked up multiple cultural events spanning the entire month, with Art Basel Hong Kong and Art Central jointly attracting around 55 000 visitor admissions. To further amplify the benefits of mega events, the HKTB will leverage major events in August this year, such as the Hong Kong Football Festival 2026 and the musical “CATS”, to proactively collaborate with merchants across different districts to launch a new round of ticket stub discounts. It will also upgrade the Hong Kong Wine & Dine Festival, one of its flagship events, into a month-long “November Gourmet Month” to entice visitors to extend their stay in Hong Kong. We will also continue our efforts to bring major cultural, sports and tourism events to Hong Kong. For example, we have successfully secured the “HYROX World Championships 2027” to be held in Hong Kong for the first time.

Meetings, incentive travel, conventions and exhibitions tourism is a major source of high value-added overnight visitors. The Government, together with the HKTB, is actively striving to secure major international conventions and exhibitions to be staged in Hong Kong. For example, the five‑day 108th Lions International Convention successfully concluded yesterday (July 7), attracting around 17 000 delegates from across the globe. Some delegates also travelled to the city with their family members, generating demand for over 10 000 hotel rooms and boosting spending in catering, retail and related sectors, with significant economic benefits. In May this year, the HKTB also signed a three-year Memorandum of Understanding with Informa Markets, a leading global trade exhibition organiser, to introduce a portfolio of premium international exhibitions, such as supercars and luxurious yachts, to Hong Kong, thereby attracting international high-end business visitors. Concurrently, the HKTB is actively expanding potential and high value-added source markets, such as the Middle East, to increase the proportion of overnight visitors.

(3) Hong Kong possesses unique coastal and island resources, with an edge in developing island tourism. The Government welcomes interested organisations to make good use of these natural resources to develop integrated resort projects on the premise of respecting and protecting the ecological environment, thereby offering visitors novel and diverse tourism experiences. If any organisation raises concrete proposal, the Culture, Sports and Tourism Bureau is pleased to actively explore with relevant organisations and serve as a facilitator, co-ordinating with relevant bureaux and departments to remove administrative barriers and jointly foster the development.

Ends/Wednesday, July 8, 2026
Issued at HKT 15:05
NNNN

Special traffic arrangements for race meeting in Happy Valley

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region – 4

The Police will implement special traffic arrangements in Happy Valley today (July 8). These arrangements will remain in effect until the race meeting has concluded, spectators have dispersed, and traffic conditions return to normal.

A. Traffic arrangements before the commencement of the first race

The following road closure and traffic diversions will be implemented from 50 minutes before the start of the first race for day racing, or from 6pm onwards for night racing:

1. Road closure

 Southbound Wong Nai Chung Road between Queen’s Road East and the up-ramp outside the Hong Kong Jockey Club (HKJC) will be closed, except for vehicles heading for Aberdeen Tunnel.

2. Traffic diversions

– Southbound Wong Nai Chung Road between Village Road and the up-ramp outside the HKJC will be rerouted one way northbound;
– Traffic along eastbound Queen’s Road East heading for Wan Chai and Happy Valley will be diverted to turn left to Morrison Hill Road;
– Traffic along southbound Morrison Hill Road heading for Happy Valley will be diverted via Sports Road and Wong Nai Chung Road;
– Traffic along Queen’s Road East cannot turn right to Wong Nai Chung Road, except for vehicles heading for Aberdeen Tunnel;
– Traffic from Cross Harbour Tunnel heading for Queen’s Road East will be diverted via the down-ramp leading from southbound Canal Road flyover to Morrison Hill Road to turn right at the junction of Wong Nai Chung Road and Queen’s Road East; and
– Traffic from Cross Harbour Tunnel heading for Happy Valley or Racecourse will be diverted via the down-ramp leading from southbound Canal Road flyover to Canal Road East, southbound Morrison Hill Road, Sports Road and Wong Nai Chung Road.

B. Traffic arrangements before the conclusion of race meeting

     The following road closure and traffic diversions will be implemented from about 35 minutes before the start of the last race:

1. Road closure

– The up-ramp on Wong Nai Chung Road outside the HKJC leading to Aberdeen Tunnel;
– Southbound Wong Nai Chung Road between Queen’s Road East and the up-ramp leading to Aberdeen Tunnel;
– Southbound Wong Nai Chung Road between Village Road and the Public Stands of the HKJC;
– Westbound Leighton Road between Wong Nai Chung Road and Canal Road East; and
– Southbound Morrison Hill Road between Leighton Road and Queen’s Road East.

     In addition, southbound Wong Nai Chung Road between the up-ramp leading to Aberdeen Tunnel and the Public Stands of the HKJC will be closed from about 10 minutes before the start of the last race.

2. Traffic diversions

– Eastbound Queen’s Road East at its junction with Morrison Hill Road will be reduced to one-lane traffic heading for northbound Canal Road flyover;
– Traffic from Cross Harbour Tunnel heading for Wan Chai will be diverted via the down-ramp leading from southbound Canal Road flyover to Canal Road East, U-turn slip road beneath Canal Road flyover, Canal Road West and Hennessy Road;
– Traffic from Cross Harbour Tunnel heading for Happy Valley will be diverted via the down-ramp leading from southbound Canal Road flyover to Canal Road East, eastbound Leighton Road and Wong Nai Chung Road;
– Traffic along southbound Morrison Hill Road will be diverted to turn left to eastbound Leighton Road;
– Traffic along southbound Morrison Hill Road heading for Happy Valley will be diverted via eastbound Leighton Road and Wong Nai Chung Road; and
– Traffic along westbound Leighton Road will be diverted to Wong Nai Chung Road.

C. Prohibition for learner drivers

     Learner drivers will be prohibited to turn left from Caroline Hill Road to Leighton Road between one and a half hours before the start of the first race and one hour after the last race. In addition, learner drivers will be prohibited from accessing the following roads within the above period of time: 

– Shan Kwong Road between Yik Yam Street and Wong Nai Chung Road;
– Village Road between its upper and lower junctions with Shan Kwong Road;
– Percival Street between Hennessy Road and Leighton Road;
– Canal Road East; and
– The service road leading from Gloucester Road to Canal Road flyover.

D. Suspension of parking spaces

     Parking spaces on southbound Wong Nai Chung Road between Sports Road and Blue Pool Road will be suspended from 11am to 7pm for day racing, and from 5pm to 11.59pm for night racing respectively. 

     All vehicles parked illegally during the implementation of the above special traffic arrangements will be towed away without prior warning, and may be subject to multiple ticketing.

Actual implementation of road closure and traffic diversion will be made by the Police at the time depending on traffic conditions in the areas. Motorists should exercise tolerance and patience, and follow the instructions of police officers on site.

Remarks by S for Health at media session on incident of errors in embryo biopsy specimens

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

Remarks by S for Health at media session on incident of errors in embryo biopsy specimens 
Reporter: Would the Government consider penalising Heal Fertility (Limited), given that it has not reported the case to the Department of Health within 24 hours? Why cannot the CUHK, when the case starts, notify the Council on Human Reproductive Technology, but they had to report to Heal Fertility (Limited) to report to the Council?
 
Secretary for Health: According to the Private Healthcare Facilities Ordinance (Cap. 633), day procedure centres have to report any serious untoward incidents within 24 hours. So in this particular incident, the centre has definitely breached this requirement, and the Department of Health has already requested the centre to provide a report within four weeks. Based on the report and further investigation findings, the Department of Health will consider any regulatory action for the breach of the Private Healthcare Facilities Ordinance.
 
Reporter: What measures would the Government implement to ensure timely reporting of these facilities in the future?
 
Secretary for Health: About the Private Healthcare Facilities Ordinance (Cap. 633), there is already a code of practice that these day procedure centres have to report serious untoward incidents within 24 hours. But for the part of the human reproductive technology, there is no definite time limit for reporting. Considering the fact that this is a little bit more complicated, the centre has decided to investigate further before reporting to the Council. Whether we need to put in a time frame for reporting, we will consider that after we have the full investigation report for this incident.
 
(Please also refer to the Chinese portion of the remarks.)
Issued at HKT 18:37

NNNN

LCSD and EDB co-organise Shaanxi-Henan study tour to enhance secondary teachers’ knowledge of Sui and Tang dynasties

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

LCSD and EDB co-organise Shaanxi-Henan study tour to enhance secondary teachers’ knowledge of Sui and Tang dynasties      
     ​These experiences not only help teachers integrate museum elements into their classrooms, thereby enriching their teaching methods and content, but also empower the schools to design more inspiring study tours for students in the future. Ultimately, this will promote heritage education and enrich Hong Kong students’ interest in learning Chinese history.Issued at HKT 18:42

NNNN

LCQ18: Occupational safety and health of air crew members

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

LCQ18: Occupational safety and health of air crew members 
Question:
 
     Some members of the sector have relayed that, air crew members are required to deal with a wide range of unforeseen incidents while providing in-flight services, including verbal disputes between passengers, physical confrontations, various security incidents and breaches of regulations, and requests for medical assistance. This, combined with the need to work long-term day and night shifts, meet high service standards and work in confined spaces, places additional psychological strain on air crew members. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
 
(1) whether it knows the respective numbers of unforeseen incidents that occurred in the passenger cabin on flights departing from or arriving in Hong Kong over the past three years (broken down by type of incident); of the reporting mechanism in place;
 
(2) whether the Civil Aviation Department has provided local airlines with guidelines or mechanisms for air crew members to handle unforeseen incidents in the passenger cabin; if so, of the details and the review cycle;
 
(3) whether it knows if local airlines currently provide adequate mental health counselling and support for their air crew members; if so, of the details; and
 
(4) given the geopolitical tensions in recent years, should war or other emergencies occur at a flight’s destination, forcing the air crew members to remain stranded there, whether the HKSAR Government will require local airlines to establish overseas emergency support teams for the crew or put in place contingency mechanisms to maintain close contact with them and provide appropriate support, thereby ensuring their personal safety?
 
Reply:
 
President,
 
     The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) has promulgated stringent standards on aviation safety. As the regulator of civil aviation affairs, the Civil Aviation Department (CAD) has been comprehensively regulating the operations of local airlines in accordance with the requirements of the ICAO and the Air Navigation (Hong Kong) Order 1995 (Cap. 448C) through the established regulatory regime and monitoring mechanism. Local airlines are subject to strict scrutiny by the CAD on a routine basis (including conducting flight inspections and operational records inspections, and also requiring local airlines to effectively implement safety management systems and formulate policies and procedures relating to risk assessment and emergency response mechanisms) to ensure that flight operations comply with airworthiness and safety standards, thereby ensuring aviation safety. At the same time, airlines are also required to implement aviation security measures in accordance with the Aviation Security Ordinance (Cap. 494), its subsidiary legislation, and the Hong Kong Aviation Security Programme. This includes formulating corresponding procedures and arrangements for handling in-flight security incidents, unruly passengers, and other situations that may affect aviation security, with a view to ensuring aviation security.
 
     In consultation with the Security Bureau and the Labour Department (LD), the reply to the Member’s question is as follows:

(1) and (2) According to the standards and recommended practices of the ICAO, airlines are required to formulate standard operating procedures that comply with cabin safety guidelines to handle various in-flight incidents relating to aviation safety or aviation security. In addition, pursuant to Article 86 of the Air Navigation (Hong Kong) Order 1995, the CAD requires all local airlines to report incidents involving aviation safety to the CAD under the Mandatory Occurrence Reporting (MOR) Scheme. Upon receipt of relevant reports, the CAD will conduct a review and, where necessary, conduct investigations with the airlines and assess the investigation results. For aviation security incidents, airlines must report to the CAD in accordance with section 20 of the Aviation Security Regulation (Cap. 494A). Upon receipt of the relevant reports, the CAD will also conduct a review and follow up with the airlines as appropriate if necessary. 

Year     The reports involving cabin safety received under the MOR Scheme pursuant to Article 86 of the Air Navigation (Hong Kong) Order 1995 mainly include cases of passengers and crew members feeling unwell, as well as medical needs due to injuries caused by turbulences; as for the unforeseen security incidents in cabins received through the reporting mechanism under the scope of section 20 of the Aviation Security Regulation, they mainly include assault and other disorderly conduct. With the increase in the number of flights in recent years, the number of reports of various incidents in 2025 has increased compared to previous years.

(3) It is understood that local airlines have generally adopted various measures to support the mental health of their employees (including crew members), such as signing the Mental Health Workplace Charter, organising promotional activities, and providing employee support groups and hotlines. Furthermore, to enhance the awareness and capacity of employers and employees in managing work stress and mental health issues, the LD and the Occupational Safety and Health Council (OSHC) organise occupational health talks and publicity activities related to work stress and mental health from time to time. The LD and OSHC also have published publications on work stress management to provide practical ways for managing work stress and preventing mental health issues at personal and organisational levels. In addition, the LD has been collaborating with the Department of Health (DH) and OSHC to jointly organise the Joyful@Healthy Workplace programme for many years. This initiative encourages employers and employees to work together to create a positive work environment, promoting healthy eating, physical activity, and stress management. To further enhance employers’ and employees’ awareness of mental health, the DH, LD and OSHC have also launched the Mental Health Workplace Charter together.
 
(4) With full support from the Office of the Commissioner of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and the Chinese diplomatic and consular missions, the Assistance to Hong Kong Residents Unit of the Immigration Department (ImmD) has all along been striving to provide Hong Kong residents in distress outside Hong Kong, including crew members, with all practicable assistance.Issued at HKT 12:00

NNNN

Government reappoints Executive Director of Urban Renewal Authority

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

Government reappoints Executive Director of Urban Renewal Authority 
     The Secretary for Development, Ms Bernadette Linn, said, “Mr Wilfred Au possesses rich professional expertise and experience and is well versed in the URA’s overall operation. In the past three years, Mr Au has played a pivotal role in formulating the framework and implementation details of the URA’s policies, especially in pushing forward urban redevelopment projects, as well as the ongoing review of the URA’s financing and operating model. We look forward to continuing our close working relationship with Mr Au to tackle the challenges of urban renewal.”
 
     Mr Au is an architect by profession. He was appointed Executive Director of the URA and took up the post of Executive Director (Commercial) in July 2023. Mr Au supports the URA’s Managing Director in formulating and implementing policies and initiatives on matters relating to planning and design, property and land, and business strategy.
Issued at HKT 14:15

NNNN

EMSD announces latest sampling results for legionella at fresh water cooling towers

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

EMSD announces latest sampling results for legionella at fresh water cooling towers     ​
     The EMSD reminds the owners of fresh water cooling towers that they have the responsibility to design, operate and maintain cooling towers properly. They should arrange regular inspections, timely maintenance and periodic testing of the water quality in their cooling towers in accordance with the Code of Practice for Fresh Water Cooling Towers issued by the department to prevent the proliferation of legionella.
Issued at HKT 12:30

NNNN

LCQ19: Regulating charitable organisations

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

LCQ19: Regulating charitable organisations 
Question:
 
     Regarding the continued concerns over the transparency and accountability of charitable organisations in society, will the Government inform this Council:
 
(1) of the respective numbers of tax-exempt charitable organisations, as well as institutions newly exempted and those whose exemption status had been withdrawn under section 88 of the Inland Revenue Ordinance (Cap. 112) in each of the past five financial years; among cases whose exemption status was withdrawn, of the major reasons involved (e.g. incompatible with the charitable purpose, cessation of operation, accounting issues) and, among which, the number of institutions whose exemption status has been withdrawn due to failure to pass the regular reviews;
 
(2) other than the Tax Guide for Charitable Institutions and Trusts of a Public Character currently published on the website of the Inland Revenue Department (IRD), whether the IRD has compiled a separate and more detailed internal reference document and consolidated the principles for determining “charitable nature” and “public interests” as illustrated in the relevant case laws; if it has, whether it will consider further consolidating the relevant principles into more detailed administrative guidelines or practical explanations and make them available to the public, so that applicant institutions and members of the public may have a clearer understanding of the relevant criteria;
 
(3) given that the Law Reform Commission (LRC) pointed out in its Report on Charities published in December 2013 that solely relying on case law rather than a clear statutory definition of what constitutes “charitable purpose” might affect the clarity of the law, has the IRD encountered any questions of interpretation arising from different case laws during its regular reviews of exempted institutions; if it has, how it will follow up and address the issues;
 
(4) given that it has been more than 12 years since the LRC Report on Charities was published, and upon gaining experience from the implementation of the existing administrative measures, has the Government conducted any internal discussion or preliminary studies regarding the “charity commission” proposed by the said Report; whether it will consider consulting stakeholders on the pros and cons of different modes of regulation for charitable organisations in due course, with a view to exploring the feasibility of improving the frameworks of the relevant legislation in the long run;
 
(5) given that the Audit Commission pointed out in paragraph 1.4 of its Report No. 68 published in April 2017 that the Social Welfare Department (SWD), the Home Affairs Department (HAD) and the Food and Environmental Hygiene Department (FEHD) have respectively regulated different types of charitable fundraising activities held in public places, and that paragraph 5.7 of the said Report pointed out that the SWD and the HAD have imposed audit and submission conditions on the accounts of fundraising activities, while the FEHD has merely imposed similar requirements on institutions which are granted a relatively large number of licences each year, whether the authorities will study and gradually standardise the relevant regulatory standards, including requiring all charitable fundraising activities involving public places to submit audited accounts, and formulating clearer disclosure requirements regarding the use of donations and fundraising expenses; if so, of the details and timetable; if not, the reasons for that; and
 
(6) to further enhance transparency and public monitoring, whether the authorities will establish an inter-departmental central information platform for charitable organisations and consolidate information such as basic data, exemption status, licences and audited accounts of such organisations which are currently scattered across various departments, so as to facilitate public access; if so, of the details and timetable; if not, the reasons for that?

Reply: 
     In consultation with the Environment and Ecology Bureau, the Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau, and the Labour and Welfare Bureau, I, on behalf of the Government, now give a reply to the various parts of the question raised by Professor the Hon Alex Fan as follows:
 
(1) Charities are exempted from tax if they meet the conditions stipulated in section 88 of the Inland Revenue Ordinance (Cap. 112) (IRO), i.e. (i) the profits are applied solely for charitable purposes; (ii) the profits are not expended substantially outside Hong Kong; and (iii) either the trade or business is exercised in the course of the actual carrying out of the expressed objects of the charity, or the work in connection with the trade or business is mainly carried on by persons for whose benefit the charity is established.
 
     In the past five financial years, the total number of tax-exempt charities, as well as charities newly exempted from paying tax and those with tax exemption status withdrawn by the Inland Revenue Department (IRD) are set out below:
 

Financial year
(as at March 31)      ​In the past five financial years, the number of charities with tax exemption status withdrawn by the IRD and the reasons for withdrawals are as follows:
 

Financial year
(as at March 31)Dissolved or wound upCeased operation or became dormantNo response to the IRD’s enquiries or untraceableNo longer qualified for the status of a charitable institution or trust of a public character     ​The IRD does not maintain breakdown on the number of charities with tax exemption status withdrawn for failing regular reviews.

(2) and (3) In processing applications for tax exemption under section 88 of the IRO, the IRD has been making reference to the relevant common law cases to determine whether the applicant is a charity at law, and whether the organisation is established for public benefit. The IRD regularly reviews the tax-exempt charities to ascertain whether their objects are still of charitable nature and whether the activities are compatible with their stated objects. Each case is considered on its own merits, having regard to the facts and circumstance of the particular case. The IRD will also update the Tax Guide for Charitable Institutions and Trusts of a Public Character from time to time to provide clear guidance to the applicants and the public.
 
     The IRD has not encountered interpretation issues arising from applying the relevant common law cases when conducting regular reviews of tax-exempt charities. 
     As regards the suggestion to establish a charity commission, the LRC stated in its final report that the public consultation conducted in 2011 reflected that there was clearly no broad consensus across the community on whether such a commission should be established in future. Taking into account the polarised views and concerns expressed by the public and stakeholders during the consultation period, the LRC ultimately recommended that a charity commission should not be established at that time. On the other hand, since the legislation and monitoring in relation to charitable organisations involve different bureaux and departments, and that the establishment of a dedicated department or organisation as the regulator of charitable organisations would have significant implications on the definition and operation of charitable organisations in Hong Kong, the Government needs to examine the recommendation thoroughly and carefully, and will continue to keep under review its suitability and implementation timing. 
(6) To enhance the transparency of information provided by the charitable organisations and to facilitate public access, the Government has, since 2018, strengthened the consolidation of information held by various departments in relation to charitable fund-raising activities and uploaded it onto the dedicated fund-raising activities page on GovHK. Apart from enabling the public to inspect the audited accounts submitted by organisations which obtained approval to organise charitable fund-raising activities, the webpage also allows public access to information on different types of approved fund-raising activities. It also contains the Good Practice Guide and practical information provided by various departments for organisations intending to conduct charitable activities to draw reference.
Issued at HKT 14:22

NNNN

LCQ17: Promoting energy saving and carbon reduction in government departments and public organisations

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

LCQ17: Promoting energy saving and carbon reduction in government departments and public organisations 
Question:

     The National 15th Five-Year Plan proposes to accelerate the comprehensive green transformation of economic and social development, and establishes the “dual carbon” targets of achieving carbon peaking before 2030 and carbon neutrality before 2060. The HKSAR Government has likewise taken forward four major decarbonisation strategies under Hong Kong’s Climate Action Plan 2050, namely “net-zero electricity generation”, “energy saving and green buildings”, “green transport” and “waste reduction”, to align with the national direction. Furthermore, the Government has amended the Buildings Energy Efficiency Ordinance to include public facilities under the mandatory energy audits conducted once every five years, and has promulgated the Strategy of Hydrogen Development in Hong Kong to launch local trial projects on hydrogen as fuel. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council: 
President,
 
     To align with the national “dual carbon” targets, the Government strives to achieve carbon neutrality before 2050 and reduce the total carbon emissions from the 2005 level by half before 2035. In addition to formulating territory-wide policies, the Government has adopted a “whole-government” approach to managing the operation of government departments and has taken forward various measures in our bid to achieve decarbonisation.
      
     In consultation with the Transport and Logistics Bureau and the Innovation, Technology and Industry Bureau (ITIB), our reply to the question raised by the Hon Hung Kam-in is as follows:      Besides, in response to the long-term goal of carbon neutrality set out by the Government under the Hong Kong Climate Action Plan 2050, a number of public organisations (such as the Hospital Authority (HA) and the Hong Kong Housing Authority), tertiary institutes, and secondary and primary schools have also increased the use of RE at their respective premises.

(2) To assist government bureaux and departments (B&Ds) in setting emission reduction targets and implementing emission reduction measures in a more scientific way, the Government promulgated in 2017 the “Carbon Management in Government Buildings” circular which requires all major government buildings to undergo regular carbon audits, the results of which should be disclosed to the public through the publication of annual environmental performance reports or other means. B&Ds will follow up on the implementation of practicable carbon reduction measures based on the recommendations in the carbon audit reports. Owing to the differences in the nature and operating conditions of various B&Ds, it would be difficult to formulate a one-size-fits-all decarbonisation solution and target that are applicable to all departments.      We will actively explore the application of hydrogen gensets at government construction sites. As for the its application as backup power supplies in suitable government buildings and hospitals, the feasibility will be further studied subject to the results of further safety assessments and actual operational needs. The Government will continue to uphold the principle of advancing with prudence, and review the effectiveness of the trial projects through the Inter-departmental Working Group. Taking into account technological maturity and economic viability, we will formulate the next development blueprint in due course, and make good use of existing resources and relevant funds to support suitable applications as well as research and development projects, thereby promoting the development of hydrogen energy in Hong Kong.
      
     Besides, hydrogen vehicles offer the advantages of electric vehicles, such as zero emission and minimal noise pollution, while also providing higher energy capacity and longer driving range. However, relevant technologies are still under trials or at an early stage of development, hydrogen fuel cell (HFC) vehicles have no competitive edge for small-and-medium sized and short-to-medium ranged vehicles at this moment. Therefore, the Government is currently focusing on promoting electric vehicles, which have more mature technologies and supporting infrastructure, to drive the green transformation of vehicles in Hong Kong. At the same time, the Government will also support trials of hydrogen vehicles. As Hong Kong is a compact city, the daily travel distance of most of the vehicles is relatively short. It would be more appropriate for Hong Kong to focus on exploring the development of hydrogen heavy vehicles and hydrogen cross-boundary vehicles.
      
     At present, three HFC street washing vehicles operated by the Food and Environmental Hygiene Department under the Government fleet are undergoing operational trials. The Government will collect data and gather experience of the three HFC street washing vehicles and review the operation of other HFC vehicle trial projects to further assess the future plan for the promotion of hydrogen vehicles and the arrangement for resource allocation.
      
     In addition, the Marine Department (MD) has launched the first pilot project for methanol-powered vessels under the Government fleet, involving the building of two methanol-powered vessels for the MD. The vessels are expected to enter into service in 2029.

(5) To promote the trials of HFC heavy vehicles, the Government launched a funding scheme under the New Energy Transport Fund (the NET Fund) in December 2024 and earmarked HK$100 million in the first phase to provide funding support for local companies for the procurement of HFC heavy vehicles, establishment of hydrogen refilling facilities and hydrogen fuel expenses during the trial period.Issued at HKT 12:45

NNNN