LCQ4: Making good use of countryside resources

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region – 4

Following is a question by the Hon Kenneth Fok and a written reply by the Secretary for Environment and Ecology, Mr Tse Chin-wan, in the Legislative Council today (April 29):

Question:

Our country’s Outline of the 15th Five-Year Plan proposes to accelerate the building of a leading sports nation, including promoting the safe and orderly opening up of natural resources such as water, air and mountain areas for outdoor sports. There are views that as the total area of Hong Kong’s country parks and special areas accounts for around 40 per cent of its land area, and they possess abundant resources for developing outdoor sports activities, the authorities may make good use of this advantage to promote “Sports for All”, drive the development of outdoor events and cultivate the habit of engaging in outdoor sports among people, so as to dovetail with our country’s planning. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:

(1) as the holding of activities in country parks and marine parks requires the application for a permit under the Country Parks and Special Areas Regulations (Cap. ‍208A), but some organisers have relayed certain difficulties such as the involvement of multiple departments in the vetting and approval process and cumbersome procedures when applying to hold an activity, whether the Government will review the existing application mechanism, formulate clear guidelines and provide one-‍stop coordination arrangements, with a view to facilitating the holding of large-scale outdoor activities and events; if so, of the directions and timetable of the review; if not, the reasons for that;

(2) whether the authorities will consider adjusting the conditions for applying for such permits, so as to strengthen the responsibilities of activity organisers in protecting the ecology of venues and managing crowd safety, and establish a more stringent monitoring and penalty mechanism to enhance regulation;

(3) as the work of the Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department (AFCD) for the current year includes the implementation of the “Four Peaks” tourism project, the enhancement of the educational, recreational and sustainable eco-‍tourism functions of country parks, and the promotion of a safe and environmentally-friendly approach to their use, but there are views that the popularity of hiking in recent years has led to frequent accidents and damage to walking trails, whether the Government will cooperate with professional sports organisations in stepping up the education on safe hiking and updating the Hiking Safety Guidelines, so as to strike a balance between the development of eco-tourism and risk prevention;

(4) as the AFCD’s statistics indicate that the country parks in Hong Kong receive over 10 ‍million visitors a year, and there are views that this amount has already far exceeded the carrying capacity of country parks and resulted in serious wear and tear of popular mountain trails and facilities, whether the authorities have any plans to allocate additional resources to strengthen the management of country parks and the repair and maintenance of walking trails, so as to maintain the appeal and sustainability of mountain trails as race courses and eco-‍tourism routes; whether they will formulate an integrated management strategy in the long term that incorporates technology-‍based monitoring such as drone patrols, with a view to enhancing management efficiency; if so, of the resources required and the plan concerned; if not, the reasons for that; and

(5) of the number of prosecutions over the past five years for violating the Country Parks and Special Areas Regulations and the irregularities involved (such as illegal camping activities and unlawful hawking), with a tabulated breakdown of the relevant figures and categories?

Reply:

President,

Hong Kong has rich ecological resources, with country parks and marine parks scattered across the territory, which offer beautiful scenery and are conveniently located near the bustling urban areas. The Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department (AFCD) seeks to protect the ecology and conduct site management properly, with arrangements made to complement actively to the Government’s policies and plans to promote sports in the community. In consultation with the Culture, Sports and Tourism Bureau, our reply to the questions raised by the Hon Kenneth Fok is as follows:

(1) According to the Country Parks and Special Areas Regulations (Cap. 208A) and Marine Parks and Marine Reserves Regulation (Cap. 476A), a permit granted by the Director of Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation is required for holding large-scale events, such as sporting competitions, public meetings, funding raising events, etc, in country parks or marine parks. In vetting the applications, the AFCD will mainly consider the impacts of the event on the environment and users of country parks or marine parks, as well as risks to public safety.

All applications involving country parks can be made nine months in advance of the activity at the earliest, or must reach the AFCD at least 10 working days before the activity day. The AFCD pledges to complete the assessment within three working days upon receipt of all essential information of the application. For similar events involving marine parks, applications can be made at least eight working days before the event day. To facilitate applicants, the AFCD has formulated guidelines that clearly explain the application procedures and requirements. Based on past experience, some applications of competition in country parks involve road sections that are under the purview of other government departments. Upon receipt of such applications, the AFCD will provide immediate advice and support, assisting the applicants in contacting the relevant departments as soon as possible to ensure a smooth process. The AFCD will continue to review the process from time to time to ensure all applications are handled effectively.

(2) To ensure that events would not impact on the natural ecology and public safety, organisers are required to provide detailed information of the events when submitting applications to hold activities in country parks for the AFCD to process, including route maps, layout plans of the venue, staff arrangement, crowd control, contingency plan for inclement weather, first-aid service, etc. The AFCD would consider the past records of the organisers, as well as the safety and pedestrian flow of the proposed routes, and impose appropriate requirements to ensure smooth running of the events.

The AFCD would maintain close communication with the organisers during the preparation and implementation of the events, and deploy staff to monitor the activities onsite during the events. If any non-compliance with the permit conditions is observed during the events, the AFCD would issue warning letters to the organisers. If there is any contravention of the law, the AFCD will take resolute enforcement actions. In order to establish a more stringent monitoring and penalty system, the AFCD had updated the guidelines in December 2025. If the organisers commit any non-compliant acts during the events, the bad track record will be recorded and taken into account by the AFCD when handling their future applications for holding events. If the organisers commit serious non-compliant acts, such as violations of the permit conditions, the AFCD may having regard to the circumstances impose a “suspension period” on the organisers for a certain period of time.

(3) The AFCD adopts a multi-prong approach to enhance safe hiking experiences, including placing information boards and direction signs at appropriate locations within the country parks, installing railings and warning signs at high-risk locations to prevent hikers from wandering into these locations and resulting in accidents. The department deploys additional staff to patrol, and utilises technology such as unmanned aerial vehicles in reminding hikers to pay attention to safety. On publicity and education fronts, the AFCD provides comprehensive information on various hiking trails on its “Enjoy Hiking” website (www.hiking.gov.hk), which also lists out high-risk locations with records of fatal and serious accidents, thereby enabling visitors to plan their trips properly. The AFCD has formulated country park hiking safety guidelines to remind visitors to pay attention to the weather, hike with company as far as possible, etc, and disseminates information on hiking safety through the AFCD’s website, “Enjoy Hiking” website, the thematic webpage “Hong Kong Great Outdoors” of the Hong Kong Tourism Board (www.discoverhongkong.com/eng/outdoors.html), and the social media platforms locally, and those in the Mainland and overseas as well.

The AFCD will continue to listen to the views of different stakeholders, including sports associations and professional bodies, and consult the statutory body of the Country and Marine Parks Boards, which is boardly represented by different sectors, to review practically the country park management strategies, and update safety guidelines as needed.

(4) The level of wear and tear of hiking trail facilities is dependent on multiple factors, including visitor numbers, hiking etiquette and nearby environment conditions. Certain popular trails and attractions may experience vegetation and soil erosion due to large visitation, aggravating deterioration of the facilities. In the light of the increasingly keen public interest of visiting country parks, the AFCD is enhancing the coverage and connectivity of the trail network, as well as implementing enhancement projects in various country parks, to divert visitors with diverse needs, thereby alleviating pressure on the hotspots. The AFCD will continue to closely monitor and analyse the visitor flow, and assess the usage conditions of country park trail facilities, and undertake appropriate enhancement works subject to resource availability, including rehabilitating eroded trails, controlling soil erosion on pathways, improving vegetation, enhancing cleansing services, upgrading visitor information, and strengthening public education to foster awareness regarding the protection of country park environments. Where deemed necessary, the AFCD may restrict the frequency of organising events at certain popular sites in the country parks.

In addition, the AFCD is actively applying technology to enhance management of country parks. To facilitate more effective monitoring of visitor flow in country parks, the AFCD has launched a pilot scheme since 2022 involving the installation of automatic people counters at main entrances of Aberdeen Country Park and Tai Lam Country Park, utilising infrared sensor technology to continuously record visitor flow. The scheme will be progressively extended to other country parks. Furthermore, the AFCD is currently assessing the feasibility of utilising unmanned aerial vehicles for monitoring trail conditions.

(5) The number of prosecutions instituted by the AFCD for various offences in country parks and special areas across the territory over the past five years is tabulated below:
 

Nature of offence Number of prosecutions
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Unauthorised possession or driving of vehicles or bicycles 426 342 236 416 227
Illegal camping 151 364 199 214 116
Entering closed sites (Note 1) 371 297 21 0 0
Illegal lighting of fires 94 74 22 20 17
Damaging plants 40 38 29 15 20
Littering 42 14 8 7 42
Others (Note 2) 16 15 16 20 33
Total 1140 1144 531 692 455

Note 1: All designated camping sites and barbecue sites in country parks were closed during the COVID-19 pandemic and reopened on November 17, 2022. Some of the prosecutions were instituted in 2023.

Note 2: Other offences included illegal selling of objects, displaying advertisement, damaging country park facility, disturbing soil, spitting, holding of sporting competition and other commercial activities without approval, entering specified zone (i.e. the Hong Kong Wetland Park) without paying admission fee and obstructing authorised officer in discharge of duty.

LCQ6: Improving the Enhanced Supplementary Labour Scheme

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region – 4

     Following is a question by the Hon Shiu Ka-fai and a written reply by the Secretary for Labour and Welfare, Mr Chris Sun, in the Legislative Council today (April 29):
 
Question:
 
     At present, the approval granted to employers for labour importation under the Enhanced Supplementary Labour Scheme will not be automatically renewed. If an employer still needs the continued employment of the imported workers concerned upon the expiry of their contracts, the employer is required to submit to the Labour Department a renewal application around eight to nine months before the expiry of their employment contracts. Some people from industries such as cleaning and security services have reflected that property management companies or property owners generally conduct a fresh tender exercise for such services only two to three months before the expiry of the relevant service contracts and decide which service provider to engage only one month before the commencement of the new contract period. If the company concerned fails to secure the renewal of the contract, its renewal applications for its imported workers may eventually have to be cancelled. In addition, some industries have reflected that the restrictions imposed by the authorities on the workplace of imported workers have affected employers’ flexibility in deploying manpower. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
 
(1) whether it will take into account the actual operational circumstances of industries such as cleaning and security services and relax the restrictions on renewal applications for imported workers as well as shorten the time required for processing such applications; whether it will allow imported workers whose renewal applications have been approved to apply for a change of the workplace specified in the contract one month in advance; 

(2) given the view that the Government’s outsourced service contracts (such as those for cleaning and security services) do not allow contractors to apply for labour importation, thus making it difficult for contractors to fill job vacancies, whether the authorities will review the relevant policy; if so, of the review progress; 

(3) as it is learnt that the authorities’ restriction on the number of workplaces for imported workers to no more than three has constrained the manpower deployment flexibility of employers with multiple operating premises, such as chain stores, whether the authorities will relax the relevant restriction; and 

(4) in view of the authorities’ reply on July 10, 2024, to my question that they would not consider changing the requirement that the wages of imported workers must not be lower than the median monthly wage (the median wage) for comparable positions in Hong Kong and had no plan to change the arrangement of requiring employers to pay the Employees Retraining Levy (ERL) totalling $9,600 for each worker for every two-year period of his contract despite the view of some industry members that the aforesaid levy, coupled with accommodation expenses and other related expenses, has substantially increased the operating costs of enterprises, whether the authorities will consider reviewing afresh the median wage requirement and abolishing the requirement to pay the ERL, so as to reduce the operating costs of enterprises in Hong Kong and enhance their competitiveness?

Reply:
 
President,
 
     To cope with the challenges brought by manpower shortage and foster Hong Kong’s economic development, the Government, on the principle of ensuring employment priority for local workers, suitably allows employers with genuine difficulty in recruiting suitable local workers to apply for importation of workers. Apart from launching sector-specific labour importation schemes for the construction sector, transport sector, and residential care homes for the elderly and residential care homes for persons with disabilities, the Labour Department (LD) has implemented the Enhanced Supplementary Labour Scheme (ESLS) since September 4, 2023 to allow employers with genuine needs to apply for importation of workers for posts that were generally excluded under the previous Supplementary Labour Scheme.
 
     In consultation with the Financial Services and Treasury Bureau, the reply to the Member’s question is as follows:
 
(1) Under the ESLS, employers wishing to continue employing imported workers upon the expiry of their employment contracts are required to submit applications afresh to the LD (renewal applications). Employers submitting renewal applications have to fulfil the same requirements as those for new applications, which include undertaking local recruitment and according priority to employing suitable local job seekers, as well as meeting the relevant manning ratio requirements of local workers to imported workers etc, so as to assess the employers’ needs for continuing to employ imported workers and safeguard the employment priority for local workers. After an employer has completed the local recruitment, the LD will analyse each application and invite members of the Labour Advisory Board to give views. The Commissioner for Labour will thoroughly assess various factors and determine whether to approve or refuse the relevant application for importation of labour.
 
     To ensure that employers can complete the abovementioned application and relevant renewal procedures, and apply for the visas/ entry permits with the Immigration Department before the expiry of employment contracts of serving imported workers, the LD suggests employers to submit renewal applications around eight to nine months before the expiry of employment contracts of imported workers. Employers may determine the suitable timing for submitting renewal applications taking into account the situations of their business and employment contracts of imported workers, etc. While the LD will promptly process the applications, the actual time required depends on whether the employers have provided sufficient information, whether details of the renewal applications are the same as the previously approved applications, whether employers have made changes to the application information during processing, etc.
 
     As required by the ESLS, imported workers must work at the designated workplace(s) as stipulated in employment contracts and change of the workplace(s) is generally not permitted. If there are business circumstances necessitating a change of the workplace(s) of imported workers, employers may apply to the LD and state the relevant justifications. The LD will consider exercising discretion and handle the applications on their own merits.

(2) According to the 2025 Annual Earnings and Hours Survey published by the Census and Statistics Department, there were about 190 000 workers in the “Estate management, security and cleaning services” industry covering the group of elementary occupations and service workers. As at February this year, there were around 5 000 imported cleaners and security guards working in Hong Kong under the ESLS.
 
     The remuneration for non-skilled workers under government outsourced service contracts is different from that under the ESLS on various fronts, including government service contractors are required to pay non-skilled workers at a rate not lower than the “committed wage” as stipulated in service contracts, while as required under the ESLS, imported workers are paid not lower than the median monthly wages of comparable positions taken up by local workers. Besides, different requirements on other employment terms are in place under government outsourced service contracts (such as the provision of gratuity and wage arrangement for working when the typhoon signal no. 8 or above is hoisted, etc).
    
     In considering whether to allow labour importation under government outsourced service contracts, the Government needs to keep abreast of the demand and supply of the relevant non-skilled workers in the local labour market (including the situation of labour importation) and explore relevant implementation arrangements of labour importation after ascertaining the subsistence of labour shortages and under the principle of ensuring employment priority for local workers. The arrangements include addressing the discrepancy between the “committed wage” to be provided by contractors under service contracts and the wages of imported workers, as well as coordinating the monitoring mechanisms across different regimes, so as to ensure effective use of public money and proper monitoring of service contractors.

(3) and (4) The main thrust of the Government’s manpower policy all along is to uphold the priority for local employment and nurture local talents. All employers employing imported workers through labour importation schemes specified in the Employees Retraining Ordinance (Cap. 423) are required to pay a levy. Such levy is transferred to the Employees Retraining Fund administered by the Employees Retraining Board for providing training and retraining to local workers and forms an integral part of the labour importation policy. Scrapping the levy arrangement is not in line with the policy objective of launching labour importation schemes on the premise of ensuring employment priority for local workers.
 
     To ensure the employment priority for local workers, applicant employers of the ESLS must undertake local open recruitment and accord priority to employing qualified local workers to fill job vacancies at a salary not lower than the median monthly wage of a comparable position in the market. In parallel, employers approved to import workers are required to sign a Standard Employment Contract (SEC) with imported workers and shall pay a salary not lower than the median monthly wage of a comparable position to avoid undermining the employment opportunities of local workers by imported workers.
 
     Upon approval to work in Hong Kong under the ESLS, imported workers must be directly employed by the same employers and shall only work in the positions and carry out job duties at the designated workplace(s) as required by the approvals-in-principle issued by the LD and the SEC. The LD has since May 2024 relaxed the workplace requirement, allowing employers to apply, during the preliminary screening, to arrange for imported workers to work at no more than three designated locations. This enables employers to deploy manpower more flexibly, thereby enhancing operational efficiency and flexibility.
        
     The LD is reviewing the ESLS, including its coverage, operation and implementation arrangements, measures to promote and ensure employment priority for local workers, as well as measures to protect the rights and benefits of imported workers. The review is expected to be completed in the second quarter of 2026. The Government will take full account of and balance the views of stakeholders during the review.

LCQ3: Payment of taxi fares via electronic payment means

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

     Following is a question by the Hon Lau Ka-keung and a written reply by the Secretary for Transport and Logistics, Ms Mable Chan, in the Legislative Council today (April 29):
     
Question:

     From April 1, 2026, all taxi drivers are required to provide at least two types of electronic payment (e-payment) means, including one QR code e-payment means (such as Alipay, WeChat Pay or BoC Pay) and one non-QR code e-payment means (such as Octopus, credit cards or Faster Payment System). Drivers may flexibly choose the e-payment means based on their operational needs, and stickers showing the available e-payment means should be displayed at designated positions on taxi windows for passengers’ easy identification. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:     
(1) and (7) All taxi drivers must provide at least two types of e-payment means (including one QR code e-payment means and one non-QR code e-payment means) starting from April 1, 2026. Since the implementation of the aforesaid requirement, the Transport Department (TD) has been closely monitoring the situation and has noted that the overall operation has been generally smooth. Taxi drivers and passengers generally welcomed the new requirement, and considered that the requirement can help reduce the time spent on giving changes, enhance the competitiveness of taxis, and provide greater convenience for passengers.     
(5) and (6) The TD has noted that mobile network coverage may be unstable at some boundary control points or in remote areas, rendering taxi drivers or passengers unable to use e-payment means to settle fares.
     ​
     In view of the above, the TD has contacted the relevant departments immediately to follow up on the matter. The Digital Policy Office has swiftly provided assistance to enhance the coverage and stability of the Wi-Fi network in the vicinity of the taxi drop-off area at the Shenzhen Bay Port, facilitating free access for those in need to the Government Wi-Fi service. The TD will continue to monitor whether unstable mobile network coverage occurs at specific locations and will follow up as appropriate.

LCQ10: Implementation of Southbound Travel for Guangdong Vehicles

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region – 4

Following is a question by the Hon Aaron Bok and a written reply by the Secretary for Transport and Logistics, Ms Mable Chan, in the Legislative Council today (April 29):

Question:

Under the arrangement for the Southbound Travel for Guangdong Vehicles (Entry into Urban Area) (STGV), approved Guangdong private cars may enter the urban areas of Hong Kong. At present, the daily quota is set at 100, and each vehicle may stay in Hong Kong for a maximum of three days. The authorities have stated that they will closely monitor its operation and may increase the quota after accumulating experience in implementation. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:

(1) of the following information since the implementation of the STGV arrangement: (i) the number of applications; (ii) the number of applications approved; (iii) the actual number of vehicles entering Hong Kong; and (iv) the average length of stay in Hong Kong among the vehicles;

(2) whether the Government will increase in phases the daily quota for vehicles entering Hong Kong under the STGV arrangement in 2026-‍2027; if so, of the target increase, the timetable, and factors for consideration in adjusting the quota (including the clearance capacity of boundary control points, the road carrying capacity, the supply of parking spaces, the provision of charging stations for electric vehicles, insurance arrangements, and support measures for law enforcement); if not, the reasons for that; and

(3) whether the Government has assessed the benefits brought by the STGV arrangement to Hong Kong in terms of tourism and consumption (such as per capita spending, retail and catering receipts, and hotel occupancy rate); if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that?

Reply:

President,

As a reciprocal arrangement for Northbound Travel for Hong Kong Vehicles, Southbound Travel for Guangdong Vehicles (the Southbound Travel Scheme) is an important measure to promote the integrated development of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA). The part concerning entry into urban area has been launched since the end of 2025, under which eligible private cars from Guangdong can apply to travel to Hong Kong via the Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge (HZMB) through innovative and simple procedures. Not only does the scheme facilitate mutual engagement between residents of Guangdong and Hong Kong, but it also achieves a higher level of mutual flow of people and goods and opens up a new model for Mainland residents to visit Hong Kong, which in turn brings opportunities to sectors such as tourism, retail, and catering in Hong Kong, benefitting Hong Kong residents and society as a whole.

     In response to the question raised by the Hon Bok, the reply is as follows.

(1) The Southbound Travel Scheme (entry into urban area) has been open for application from eligible Guangdong private cars since December 9, 2025. The Transport Department (TD) processes applications forwarded from the Mainland authorities and issues an electronic International Circulation Permit (Permit) to successful applicants. Guangdong vehicles that have been issued with a Permit and successfully made a travel booking can enter Hong Kong via the HZMB for a stay up to three days at a time. As of end of March 2026, the TD received a total of approximately 6 300 applications and issued over 5 000 Permits, with the remaining applications being processed; the cumulative number of travel bookings was over 3 500. According to data provided by the Hong Kong Customs and Excise Department, approximately 90 per cent of vehicles stayed in Hong Kong for one to two days in March 2026.

(2) The Southbound Travel Scheme has been operating smoothly and efficiently since its launch, receiving positive feedback from users. The visits by Guangdong vehicles are generally welcomed by Hong Kong citizens. The Government continues to adopt the strategies of ensuring safety, effective diversion, well-equipped supporting facilities, and streamlined application, with a view to enhancing the Southbound Travel Scheme in an orderly manner. In the course of expanding the scheme, we will take the following factors into consideration:

(i) for port clearance, according to observations by the relevant departments at the port, the queuing situation of outbound private cars at the HZMB Hong Kong Port was in good order during peak hours, and there was no traffic jam affecting other port crossings or traffic near the port;

(ii) for road traffic, the TD has continued to provide information on road and driving safety and conducted promotional education through various channels for drivers of the Southbound Travel Scheme. Since the implementation of the scheme, there have been no traffic congestion issues in any district caused by Guangdong vehicles, and the majority of the Mainland drivers have complied with the Hong Kong traffic rules while driving in the territory. The isolated cases of contraventions which involved the Southbound Travel Scheme have been handled or are being followed up; and

(iii) for supporting facilities, the Government has been actively liaising with the operators of major shopping malls and private carparks near tourist attractions and shopping hotspots to encourage gradual enhancement of the parking, payment, and charging facilities. Since the implementation of the scheme, the carparks near tourist hotspots can meet the parking needs of Guangdong vehicles; and the 83 Guobiao-standard (GB-standard) chargers currently available in Hong Kong (supporting over 1 600 GB-standard electric vehicles) are sufficient to support the charging needs of GB-standard electric vehicles during their stay in Hong Kong. As for insurance, six Hong Kong insurance companies currently offer short-term insurance products to car owners entering Hong Kong under the Southbound Travel Scheme (entry into urban area), and the insurance industry will be able to meet the greater demand for insurance policies.

Building on the above foundation, the Hong Kong SAR Government is continuously reviewing and discussing with the Guangdong authorities on the increase in quotas in an orderly manner, and is planning to progressively expand the scope of the scheme from the current four cities in Guangdong Province (Guangzhou, Zhuhai, Zhongshan, and Jiangmen) to other Guangdong cities after six months of implementation, with a view to taking forward the Southbound Travel Scheme in a prudent and manageable manner. We will announce the relevant arrangements in due course.

(3) The Hong Kong SAR Government has been committed to working with Guangdong to promote various cross-boundary transport measures, fostering connectivity and integrated development within the GBA. With the proactive response of the hotel and retail industries in Hong Kong, offering accommodation, retail spending and parking discounts for travellers under the scheme, we assess that the Southbound Travel Scheme (entry into urban area) provides Mainland tourists with more convenient and flexible travel options, allowing new niches of travellers, including individuals and families with higher spending power, to come to Hong Kong by self-driving for travelling, business, exhibitions or conferences, using professional services, and enjoying leisure and dining experiences. This benefits Hong Kong residents and various industries, opens up new opportunities for co-operation between enterprises in Guangdong and Hong Kong, strengthens bilateral trade and investment, drives Hong Kong’s economic growth, and facilitates easier access to global markets for Mainland tourists. The Government will continue to leverage on the measures benefitting Hong Kong, including the Southbound Travel Scheme, to further deepen tourism co-operation with the GBA cities, and to provide a better experience for visitors, injecting a significant impetus into the development of Hong Kong’s tourism industry.

Applications for flag days in 2027-28 to close on May 14

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region – 4

The Social Welfare Department (SWD) today (April 29) reminds charitable organisations wishing to hold flag days from April 2027 to March 2028 that the deadline for related applications is 6pm on May 14. 

The application form for flag days together with the explanatory notes can be downloaded from the SWD’s website at www.swd.gov.hk/en/ngo/controlofc/flagdays/index.html. The completed application form together with the required documents should reach the Lotteries Fund Projects Section of the SWD at Rooms 3601-02, 36/F, Dah Sing Financial Centre, 248 Queen’s Road East, Wan Chai, Hong Kong, by 6pm on May 14. Applications for flag days in 2027-28 can also be submitted online. Please refer to the SWD’s website for application details. Late applications will not be considered.

Enquiries can be made by telephone to 2832 4318 or 2832 4301; by fax to 2838 0441; or by email to flagday@swd.gov.hk

Hospital Authority Family Medicine Outpatient Services arrangements on Labour Day holiday

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

Region  1/F, 8 Chai Wan Road, Shau Kei Wan 2560 0211 3157 0077 Wan Chai Violet Peel Family Medicine Clinic LG, Tang Shiu Kin Hospital Community Ambulatory Care Centre, 282 Queen’s Road East, Wan Chai 3553 3116 3157 0000 Kowloon Kwun Tong Family Medicine Integrated Centre UG/F, 60 Hip Wo Street, Kwun Tong 2389 0331 3157 0687 Nam Cheong Family Medicine Clinic G/F, Treasury Building, 3 Tonkin Street West, Cheung Sha Wan 3742 3876 3543 5795 Our Lady of Maryknoll Hospital Family Medicine Clinic G/F, Out-patient Block, Our Lady of Maryknoll Hospital, 118 Shatin Pass Road, Wong Tai Sin 2354 2267 3157 0118 San Po Kong Robert Black Family Medicine Clinic 600 Prince Edward Road East, San Po Kong 2383 3311 3157 0113 Yau Ma Tei Jockey Club Family Medicine Clinic 1/F, 145 Battery Street, Yau Ma Tei 2272 2400 3157 0880 New Territories Lek Yuen Family Medicine Clinic G/F, 9 Lek Yuen Street, Sha Tin 2692 8730 3157 0972 North District Family Medicine Integrated Centre 3/F, North District Community Health Centre Building, 3 Wai Wo Street, Sheung Shui 2957 5186 3157 0965 Tai Po Jockey Club Family Medicine Clinic G/F, 37 Ting Kok Road, Tai Po 2664 2039 3157 0906 Tseung Kwan O (Po Ning Road) Family Medicine Clinic G/F, 28 Po Ning Road, Tseung Kwan O 2191 1083 3157 0660 Tsuen Wan Lady Trench Family Medicine Clinic 213 Sha Tsui Road, Tsuen Wan 2614 4789 3157 0107 Tuen Mun Family Medicine Clinic 11 Tsing Yin Street, San Hui, Tuen Mun 2452 9111 3543 0886 Yuen Long Jockey Club Family Medicine Clinic 269 Castle Peak Road, Yuen Long 2443 8511 3543 5007

LCQ19: Regulating claw machine venues and pinball machine shops

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

LCQ19: Regulating claw machine venues and pinball machine shops      
     It has been reported that in recent years, claw machine venues and pinball machine shops have mushroomed in Hong Kong. Some pinball machine shops feature functions such as “odds” and “points” and offer expensive prizes to solicit business, attracting members of the public or even minors to spend entire days there, thus arousing public concern about issues such as “disguised gambling practices and addiction”. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
 
(1) of the following information on reports received by the authorities from members of the public regarding claw machines in each of the past five years: (i) the number of reports (including the number of cases suspected of involving (a) illegal gambling, (b) suspected counterfeit or pirated products, and (c) alleged unfair trade practices), (ii) the number of prosecutions, and (iii) the number of successful convictions (including (a) the number of arrests, (b) the number of venues and machines involved, and (c) the amount of fines);
 
(2) given that in its reply to a question raised by a Member of this Council on February 12 last year, the Government indicated that the High Court has ruled that typical claw machine venues where people clamp items in the machines upon payment are no longer required to obtain a Places of Public Entertainment Licence under the Places of Public Entertainment Ordinance (Cap. 172), whether the authorities have plans to strengthen the regulation and inspection of claw machine venues, including formulating a new licensing system and setting the frequency of regular inspections; if so, of the details and the timetable; if not, the reasons for that;
 
(3) given that in its reply to a question raised by a Member of this Council on the first of this month, the Government indicated that if the operation of a pinball machine shop involves the offering of prizes, an Amusements with Prizes Licence (AWPL) should be obtained, and one of the licensing conditions for AWPL is “no prize offered shall be a money prize”, but it is learnt that some pinball machine shops cash out prizes through methods such as “gift redemption” and “private buybacks” to evade regulation, whether the authorities have proactively conducted regular inspections of all pinball machine shops in Hong Kong, and of the measures taken to curb the above situation; if so, the details;
 
(4) whether the Hong Kong Police Force and the Home Affairs Department will strengthen co-operation to regularly make public the number of reports, frequency of inspections, and outcome of prosecutions with respect to illegal gambling and unlicensed operations, etc, in pinball machine shops, with a view to enhancing the transparency of relevant information;
 
(5) given that in its reply to a question raised by a Member of this Council on the first of this month, the Government indicated that it is reviewing matters relating to the regulation of AWPL, whether the scope of the review will cover items such as the business models, value and redemption of prizes, entry age, business locations, and information disclosure requirements with respect to pinball machine shops, and of the respective expected timetables for completing the review and announcing the results; and
 
(6) as there are views that the prizes and their values currently offered by some claw machine venues and pinball machine shops, as well as the operation modes of the machines, may involve gambling elements and are likely to lead to obsession or even addiction among minors, apart from regulation through enacting legislation, whether the authorities have plans to strengthen co-operation with schools, parents and district organisations to educate minors about the associated risks of addiction and obsession; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that? 
President,
 
     Having consulted the Hong Kong Police Force (HKPF), the Customs and Excise Department (C&ED) and the Home Affairs Department (HAD), I provide the following consolidated reply to the question raised by the Hon Chan Pui-leung:

Case category     ​The prosecution cases were associated with the offence of possession for sale or for any purpose of trade or manufacture of goods to which a forged trade mark was applied as stipulated under section 9(2) of the Trade Descriptions Ordinance. In the four prosecution cases, C&ED arrested a total of five persons and seized 49 claw machines from 11 shops. In the three convicted cases, the sentences imposed were community service orders or suspended sentence.

(2) to (5) According to the Gambling Ordinance (Cap. 148) (the Ordinance), operating a game of amusement with prizes requires an Amusements with Prizes Licence (AWPL). Furthermore, a Places of Public Entertainment Licence under the Places of Public Entertainment Ordinance (Cap. 172) is a prerequisite for any AWPL application. 
     The PWF provides tailored counselling, treatment and other support services to individuals affected by gambling as well as their family members. It also launches targeted public education and publicity campaigns to raise public awareness, particularly among young people, of the harms associated with gambling addiction, including emerging gambling modes, to mitigate their negative impact. These public education measures include funding non-governmental organisations and schools to organise public education programmes focused on the prevention and mitigation of gambling-related problems.
Issued at HKT 12:40

NNNN

LCQ2: Subsidy Scheme for Abolition of MPF Offsetting Arrangement

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

LCQ2: Subsidy Scheme for Abolition of MPF Offsetting Arrangement 
     The Government launched the Subsidy Scheme for Abolition of MPF Offsetting Arrangement (SSA) on May 1 last year. Employers, after settling severance payment (SP) and long service payment (LSP) to their employees in accordance with the Employment Ordinance (Cap. 57), may apply for subsidies under the SSA. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
 
(1) of the number of applications received by the authorities and the average processing time for each case since the launch of the SSA; among such cases, the respective numbers and percentages of applications (i) approved, (ii) refused and (iii) withdrawn (set out in Table 1); whether it has complied statistics on the main reasons for refusal and withdrawal of the applications;
 
Table 1

Application results(2) of (i) the number of applications received by the authorities, and (ii) the number of applications approved and their percentages since the launch of the SSA, and set out in Table 2 a breakdown by the type of trade of employers involved;
 
Table 2

Type of trade of employers involved(3) of the total amount of subsidies for all approved cases and the average amount of subsidies for each case since the launch of the SSA;
 
(4) among the cases in which approval has been completed, of the respective numbers of applications in which an applicant has lodged a review as he/she is not satisfied with the amount of subsidies approved or has lodged an appeal as he/she is not satisfied with the refusal of his/her application since the launch of the SSA, and the percentages of successful appeals or reviews among them; whether it has compiled statistics on the main reasons for refusal of the review or appeal applications;
 
(5) as according to the paper submitted by the Government to the Finance Committee of this Council on November 22, 2024, the Labour Department (LD) will engage a processing agent to assist in the administration of the SSA, of the following information on the processing agent’s implementation of the SSA since February 1 last year: (i) the preparatory fee collected, (ii) the staffing establishment and strength involved, (iii) the average fee for processing each subsidy application, (iv) the number of spot checks performed on cases processed, (v) the number of enquiries received and processed, and (vi) the number of public engagement activities organised and the number of participants;
 
(6) as some employees may receive less aggregate benefits due to the change in calculation of the SP/LSP entitlement after the abolition of the offsetting arrangement, and these “worse-off” employees can apply to the LD for a subsidy to make up for the shortfall in their aggregate benefits, of the number of applications for the subsidy received by the authorities and the amount of subsidy involved since May 1 last year; and
 
(7) whether the LD has received any complaints about suspected premature dismissal of employees by employers before the abolition of the offsetting arrangement took effect in order to save SP or LSP expenses since 2025; if so, of the number of complaints received by the LD, the industries in which the complainants are engaged, and the follow-up on the complaints?

Reply:
 
President,
 
     The Government implemented the abolition of the Mandatory Provident Fund (MPF) offsetting arrangement on May 1, 2025 (the transition date). Since then, employers can no longer use the accrued benefits derived from their mandatory MPF contributions to offset an employee’s severance payment (SP)/long service payment (LSP) payable under the Employment Ordinance in respect of the employment period starting from the transition date (the post-transition portion of SP/LSP). 
     The reply to the Member’s question is set out below:
 
(1) As at March 2026, the SSA received a total of 20 790 applications from employers, of which 16 793 applications had been processed. The application results are tabulated below:
 

Results of application 
     In general, employers will be notified of the application results within 30 working days upon submission of an application and all necessary information and documents.

     Refusal of applications is primarily due to factors such as that the employers were not affected by the abolition of MPF offsetting arrangement (for example, the employees involved were exempted persons under the Mandatory Provident Fund Schemes Ordinance, or had reached the age of 65 before the transition date and thus the employers were not required to make MPF contributions for the employees in respect of the employment periods from the transition date onwards); or the employees involved did not meet the eligibility criteria for SP/LSP as specified by the Employment Ordinance at the time of termination of employment contracts. The SSA does not inquire about the reasons for withdrawal of applications from the employers concerned.
 
(2) As at March 2026, a breakdown of applications received and approved under the SSA by industry of the employers involved is at Annex.
 
(3) As at March 2026, the SSA disbursed a total amount of $42.24 million of subsidy to employers, with an average of $2,700 for each approved application.
 
(4) Applicants may request reviews of their applications with justifications if they disagree with the results, and may lodge appeals if they disagree with the review results.
 
     As at March 2026, the SSA received 294 review applications from employers, of which 130 were approved (44.2 per cent) after review. Besides, 16 appeal applications submitted by employers under the SSA were refused. The reason for refusing the review or appeal applications was that the applicants could not provide sufficient justifications for altering the original vetting decisions.
 
(5) The Labour Department (LD) appointed a processing agent (PA) to set up the Service Centre for the SSA and process subsidy applications. Breakdowns of figures for PA’s assistance in the implementation of the SSA are as follows:
 
(i) The preparatory fee received by PA was $8,800,000.
 
(ii) The Tender Documents require PA to provide no less than 76 staff members. To ensure quality of service, the actual number of staff members provided by PA as at April 15, 2026, was 93. Details are as follows:
 

Post(as at April 15, 2026)Examination team leader
Customer services team leaderApproving officer
Examiner
Customer services officer     In addition to the above, PA provided five operations management supporting staff.
 
(iii) As at April 15, 2026, the service fees received by PA for the implementation period of the SSA were $56,888,280. The service fees included the costs for operating the Service Centre and back office, provision of manpower, processing applications in accordance with the operation guidelines and instructions provided by the LD, handling enquiries and complaints, conducting quality assurance checks and internal audit checks on applications, assisting in organising publicity and public engagement activities, executing technical proposals as committed in the Tender Proposal, and carrying out all the tasks as required in the Service Contract. As the service fees reflected the aforementioned services as a whole, the average cost of processing each application cannot be determined.
 
(iv) As at March 2026, the Service Centre selected a total of 123 applications with processing completed for conducting audit checks.
 
(v) As at March 2026, the Service Centre received 27 798 enquiries and completed processing of 27 619.
 
(vi) To assist employers in understanding the SSA, the Government has conducted extensive publicity, including launching the TransitionEase website to disseminate details about applying for subsidies, and organising briefing sessions for employers, employees and human resources practitioners. From January 2025 to March 2026, the LD held a total of 63 briefing sessions, with over 18 800 participants. Besides, the Service Centre organised two briefing sessions in April 2026 to introduce SSA to employers, attracting around 140 participants.
 
(6) As at March 2026, the SSA received a total of 14 applications from employees applying for subsidy to make up for the shortfall in aggregate benefits. After vetting, two applications were approved with a total subsidy of about $12,000 disbursed and no shortfall in employees’ aggregate benefits after the abolition of the offsetting arrangement was found in respect of four applications. The remaining eight applications are being processed.
 
(7) The LD has been conducting publicity through various channels to remind employers that dismissing serving employees before the transition date and subsequently rehiring them will not save expenses on SP/LSP. The LD has not received any complaint involving employers allegedly dismissing employees before the abolition of the offsetting arrangement took effect for the purpose of reducing SP/LSP expenses.
Issued at HKT 12:45

NNNN

LCQ11: Enhancing property mortgage terms calculation method

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

LCQ11: Enhancing property mortgage terms calculation method 
Question:
 
     Currently, banks generally adopt 75 years minus the age of the property or the borrower (i.e. “75-n”), taking the shorter period as the basis, to calculate a property mortgage term of not more than 30 years. There are views that various measures introduced by the Government in recent years, including the Mandatory Building and Window Inspection Scheme and the Lift Modernisation Subsidy Scheme, have helped to improve the maintenance of many aged buildings. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
 
(1) whether it has maintained the number of transactions of properties aged over 50 years in the past three years;
 
(2) whether it has maintained the total number of units in private buildings currently aged over 50 years; and
 
(3) whether the authorities will study promoting to the banking industry to enhance the calculation method of property mortgage terms by uniformly changing the formula from “75-n” to “80-n”?
 
Reply:
 
President,
 
     Proper maintenance of private buildings is owners’ primary responsibility. In addition to identifying high-risk private buildings through the Mandatory Building Inspection Scheme (MBIS) for issuing MBIS notices requiring owners to inspect and repair the buildings, the Government also partners with the Urban Renewal Authority to launch a number of building rehabilitation subsidy schemes to support owners in need with proper building maintenance. These schemes include the Operation Building Bright 2.0 and Lift Modernisation Subsidy Scheme (LIMSS), etc. In the 2026-27 Budget, the Government announced that $3 billion would be earmarked for drawing up a new subsidy scheme to assist owners in need with building inspections and repairs, and $1 billion would be allocated to extend the LIMSS.
 
     After consulting the Development Bureau and the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA), our reply to the three parts of the question is as follows:
 
(1) & (2) According to the Buildings Department (BD)’s record, as at the end of 2025, there were approximately 11 000 private buildings aged 50 years or above. However, the BD does not maintain records of the number of units involved.
 
     As regards the number of property transactions, the Land Registry (LR)’s function is to register and maintain records of the instruments submitted to the LR, including property sale and purchase agreements, assignments, and mortgages/legal charges. Therefore, the LR does not maintain statistics on transactions of properties by building age.
 
(3) The approval of loans is a commercial decision made by banks. When processing mortgage applications, banks take into account a host of factors, including the borrower’s repayment capacity and the condition of the building. The age of the property and the borrower are just among various factors of consideration. When considering whether to approve mortgage applications for a residential property, the information regarding the completion of inspection and repair of the building may assist banks in evaluating the condition of the building. The HKMA does not set a specific mortgage term limit based on the age of a property or a borrower.
Issued at HKT 14:35

NNNN

Commissioner of Police leads delegation to visit Singapore

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

Commissioner of Police leads delegation to visit Singapore       
     The delegation attended the MTX 2026 on April 28 and engaged with the international public safety community to better understand innovative and emerging technologies to enhance public safety. The summit, held biennially, is the largest public safety conference in Southeast Asia serving as a global platform to foster collaboration and advance public safety capabilities through science and technology. The delegation attended keynote sessions and panel discussions on various topics, such as artificial intelligence and network security, and visited key exhibitions showcasing the latest innovations in public safety, demonstrating the HKPF’s ongoing efforts in advancing technology applications and international co-operation.
      
     On the sidelines of the summit, the delegation met with the Commissioner of the Singapore Police Force, Mr How Kwang Hwee, and the Inspector-General of the Royal Malaysia Police, Mr Dato’ Sri Haji Mohd Khalid Ismail, to exchange views on issues of mutual concern. The delegation also engaged with international experts and technology professionals across the public safety ecosystem.
      
     On the same day, Mr Chow also met the Chief Executive of HTX, Mr Chan Tsan. Following the meeting, both sides signed an MOU to strengthen co-operation in leveraging innovative technologies to advance public safety. The MOU provides a broad framework for co-operation in areas of mutual interest, including capability development, knowledge exchange, anti-scam measures, training systems, and exploration of emerging technologies to support policing operations.
      
     Separately, on April 27, the delegation visited the INTERPOL Global Complex for Innovation, and toured its Digital Forensics Laboratory to gain insights into the application of artificial intelligence in combating transnational cybercrime.
      
     Mr Chow concluded his visit today (April 29) and returned to Hong Kong.
Issued at HKT 15:00

NNNN