CE to attend flame-lighting ceremony of 15th National Games, 12th National Games for Persons with Disabilities and 9th National Special Olympic Games in Nansha, Guangzhou

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region – 4

The Chief Executive, Mr John Lee, will depart for Nansha, Guangzhou, tomorrow morning (October 9) to attend the flame-lighting ceremony of the 15th National Games (NG), the 12th National Games for Persons with Disabilities (NGD) and the 9th National Special Olympic Games (NSOG).
 
Mr Lee will be an officiating guest at the ceremony and will light the flame for the 15th NG, the 12th NGD and the 9th NSOG on behalf of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. The Vice President and Secretary-General of the Organising Committee of the 15th NG, the 12th NGD and the 9th NSOG and Chief Secretary for Administration, Mr Chan Kwok-ki, will receive the flame of the 15th NG, the 12th NGD and the 9th NSOG.
 
     Guangdong, Hong Kong and Macao will be presented with the flame of the 15th NG, the 12th NGD and the 9th NSOG at the ceremony, symbolising their cohosting of the Games.

Mr Lee will return to Hong Kong the same afternoon.

Government announces subscription and allocation results of Silver Bond

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region – 4

The Government announced today (October 8) the subscription and allocation results of the new batch of Silver Bond.
 
According to the subscription information submitted by the Placing Banks and the Designated Securities Brokers, as at the close of the subscription period on September 29, 2025, a total of 371,821 valid applications were received for a total of HK$98,227,300,000 in principal amount of bonds.
 
The final issuance amount of the Silver Bond will be HK$55 billion, higher than the target issuance amount of HK$50 billion. Allocation is conducted in accordance with the mechanism set out in the Issue Circular. All valid applications received have been allocated bonds up to a maximum of 17 units (with each unit being HK$10,000). For the 89,958 applications seeking 16 or fewer units, they will be allocated the full amounts applied for. The remaining 281,863 applications applying for more than 16 units will be allocated 16 units each and then entered into a ballot. Of these applications, 113,918 will be allocated one additional unit.
 
The Silver Bond will be issued on October 10, 2025, under the retail part of the Infrastructure Bond Programme. Notifications on individual allocation results, applicable subscription moneys and refund of application moneys in excess of the allocated portion will be sent to applicants.
 
The Financial Secretary, Mr Paul Chan, said, “Both the number of applicants and subscription amount for this batch of Silver Bond have reached record highs, demonstrating that Silver Bond continues to be widely welcomed by the public. Silver Bond provides a safe, reliable and low-risk investment option with steady returns for senior citizens, while supporting infrastructure projects for the good of the economy and people’s livelihoods at the same time. It provides members of the public with a greater ‘sense of participation’ and ‘sense of gain’ in support of infrastructure projects for Hong Kong’s long-term development. We will keep the Silver Bond scheme under review, taking account of investor response, market conditions and other relevant considerations.”

Hong Kong Customs raids two suspected illicit cigarette storage centres (with photos)

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region – 4

Hong Kong Customs today (October 8) detected two illicit cigarette cases and raided two suspected illicit cigarette storage centres in Kwai Chung and Kwun Tong. About 350 000 suspected illicit cigarettes with an estimated market value of about $1.6 million and a duty potential of about $1.2 million were seized. Three persons suspected to be connected with the cases were arrested. 

In the first case, Customs officers conducted an anti-illicit cigarette operation in Kwai Chung this morning and seized about 290 000 suspected illicit cigarettes inside a subdivided flat in an industrial building on Wo Yi Hop Road. A 33-year-old man and a 52-year-old woman, both claiming to be unemployed, suspected to be connected with the case were arrested. 

In the second case, Customs officers conducted an anti-illicit cigarette operation in Kwun Tong in the same morning and intercepted a suspicious man in an industrial building on Hing Yip Street. Two thousand two hundred suspected illicit cigarettes were seized from his backpack, and the 62-year-old man, who claimed to be a transportation worker, was subsequently arrested. Later, Customs officers escorted the man to a mini-storage facility in the industrial building for a search and further seized about 61 000 suspected illicit cigarettes.

After preliminary investigations, Customs believed that the suspected illicit cigarette storage centres were primarily used to supply illicit cigarettes to areas in Kwai Chung and Kowloon East. Customs will continue to trace the source of the illicit cigarettes, and the likelihood of further arrests is not ruled out.

The three arrested persons were charged with “dealing with goods to which the Dutiable Commodities Ordinance applies”. The two arrestees from the first case will appear at the West Kowloon Magistrates’ Courts tomorrow (October 9). The arrestee from the second case will appear at the Kwun Tong Magistrates’ Courts on November 10. 

Customs will continue its risk assessment and intelligence analysis for interception at source as well as through its multipronged enforcement strategy targeting storage, distribution and peddling to spare no effort in combating illicit cigarette activities.

Customs stresses that it is an offence to buy or sell illicit cigarettes. Under the Dutiable Commodities Ordinance, anyone involved in dealing with, possession of, selling or buying illicit cigarettes commits an offence. The maximum penalty upon conviction is a fine of $2 million and imprisonment for seven years.

Members of the public may report any suspected illicit cigarette activities to Customs’ 24-hour hotline 182 8080 or its dedicated crime-reporting email account (crimereport@customs.gov.hk) or online form (eform.cefs.gov.hk/form/ced002).

     

Silver Bond allocations announced

Source: Hong Kong Information Services

The subscription and allocation results for the latest batch of Silver Bonds were released today.

A total of 371,821 valid applications, seeking $98.2 billion in bond principals, were received.

Of the applications received, 89,958 were for 16 units or fewer. These applicants will be allocated the full amounts they applied for.

The remaining 281,863 applications were for more than 16 units. These applicants will be allocated 16 units each, with 113,918 being allocated one additional unit following a ballot.

The bonds will be issued on Friday and the final issuance amount will be $55 billion.

Financial Secretary Paul Chan highlighted that both the number of applicants and the subscription amount for this round of bonds represented record highs, demonstrating that there is strong demand for the Silver Bond scheme.

He said it provides a safe, reliable and low-risk investment option with steady returns for senior citizens, while also supporting infrastructure projects for the good of the economy and people’s livelihoods.

“We will keep the scheme under review, taking account of investor response, market conditions and other relevant considerations,” he added.

CE to attend games flame-lighting

Source: Hong Kong Information Services

Chief Executive John Lee will attend the flame-lighting ceremony of the 15th National Games (NG), the 12th National Games for Persons with Disabilities (NGD) and the 9th National Special Olympic Games (NSOG), in Nansha, Guangzhou tomorrow.

At the ceremony, Mr Lee will be an officiating guest to light the flame for the 15th NG, the 12th NGD and the 9th NSOG on behalf of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.

Vice President and Secretary-General of the Organising Committee of the 15th NG, the 12th NGD & the 9th NSOG, and Chief Secretary Chan Kwok-ki, will receive the flame of the games.

Guangdong, Hong Kong and Macau will be presented with the flame to symbolise the three places cohosting the games.

Mr Lee will depart for the ceremony tomorrow morning and return to Hong Kong that afternoon.

Lands Department issues two pre-sale consents in third quarter of 2025

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region – 4

     The Lands Department (LandsD) announced today (October 8) that two pre-sale consents for residential developments involving 1 851 residential units were issued in the third quarter of 2025.

     Details of the above residential developments with pre-sale consents issued are as follows:
 

Expected year of completion Developments
2025
  • One development in Sai Kung (51 units)
2028
  • One development in Kai Tak (1 800 units)

 
     The LandsD also issued two consents to assign in the third quarter, involving a total of 87 residential units in two phases of a development in Kowloon Tong.

     As at September 30, 2025, 29 applications for pre-sale consent for residential developments involving 8 902 residential units were being processed. Details are as follows:
 

Expected year of completion No. of applications No. of residential units involved
2026 10 2 832
2027 13 3 563
2028 6 2 507

 
     In addition, 10 applications for consent to assign involving 3 666 residential units and four non-residential units respectively as well as three applications for pre-sale consent for non-residential developments were being processed.

     Members of the public can obtain up-to-date information on consents issued for the past quarter and cases pending approval by visiting the LandsD website (www.landsd.gov.hk).

     Intending purchasers are advised to study carefully the details of the development and the sale procedures, through information available from public advertisements, sales brochures and price lists released by the developer, before making a deposit for purchase. The sales brochure for a development also contains a summary of the provisions of the Deed of Mutual Covenant, including information on the common parts, the number of undivided shares assigned to each unit, the term of years for which the manager is appointed, the basis on which the management expenses are shared among the owners of the units, as well as a summary of the provisions of the government land grant, which intending purchasers are recommended to read carefully.

LCQ14: The measures of “allowing Hong Kong-invested enterprises to adopt Hong Kong law” and “allowing Hong Kong-invested enterprises to choose for arbitration to be seated in Hong Kong”

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region – 4

Following is a question by the Hon Erik Yim and a written reply by the Secretary for Justice, Mr Paul Lam, SC, in the Legislative Council today (October 8):

Question:

The Second Agreement Concerning Amendment to the Mainland and Hong Kong Closer Economic Partnership Arrangement  Agreement on Trade in Services (Amendment Agreement II) brings the addition of “allowing Hong Kong-invested enterprises to adopt Hong Kong law” and “allowing Hong Kong-invested enterprises to choose for arbitration to be seated in Hong Kong” as facilitation measures for Hong Kong investors, supports Hong Kong-invested enterprises registered in the pilot municipalities of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA) to adopt Hong Kong law or Macao law as the applicable law in their contracts, and supports Hong Kong-invested enterprises registered in the nine Pearl River Delta municipalities in the GBA to choose Hong Kong or Macao as the seat of arbitration. In addition, the Supreme People’s Court and the Ministry of Justice jointly issued the Opinion on Fully Leveraging the Functions of Arbitration to Serve the High-Quality Development of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area in February this year to propose the extension details of the two measures. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:

(1) regarding the addition of the measures of “allowing Hong Kong-invested enterprises to adopt Hong Kong law” and “allowing Hong Kong-invested enterprises to choose for arbitration to be seated in Hong Kong” under Amendment Agreement II, whether the Government will clearly specify their scopes of application, including the industries and types of cases covered; if so, when the relevant details will be announced;

(2) given the views that at present there are differences in the arbitral proceedings between the Mainland and Hong Kong (such as the emergency arbitrator system and application procedures for interim measures), how the Government will take part in formulating the relevant arbitration rules in implementing the measure of “allowing Hong Kong-invested enterprises to choose for arbitration to be seated in Hong Kong”, and whether it will promote the adoption of internationally accepted standards; and

(3) given that Guangdong, Hong Kong and Macao have agreed to jointly establish the Panel of GBA Arbitrators, how the Government will ensure that the professional qualifications of local arbitrators align with the standards adopted in the Mainland; whether it will further enhance the various talent admission schemes to attract more international arbitration experts to come to Hong Kong for development?

Reply:

President,

In response to the enquiry raised by the Hon Erik Yim, the reply is as follows:

(1) The measure of “allowing Hong Kong-invested enterprises to adopt Hong Kong law” has been piloted in Qianhai, Shenzhen, since 2020 whereas the measure of “allowing Hong Kong-invested enterprises to choose Hong Kong as the seat of arbitration” has been in trial implementation since 2017 in Chinese Mainland’s Pilot Free Trade Zones. Both measures have been well received by stakeholders.

In October 2024, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (SAR) and the Chinese Mainland signed the Second Agreement Concerning Amendment to the Mainland and Hong Kong Closer Economic Partnership Arrangement Agreement on Trade in Services, which, for the first time, incorporated the above two measures into the Mainland and Hong Kong Closer Economic Partnership Arrangement. The amendments support the expansion of the applicable scope of these two measures in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area, reflecting the Central Government’s emphasis and support for Hong Kong’s legal system.

The extension of both measures has been in force since February 14, 2025. Details such as the applicable scope are set out in: (1) the Supreme People’s Court’s “Official Reply on the Issues concerning the Validity of the Adoption of Hong Kong or Macao Law as the Applicable Law of Contracts or the Designation of Hong Kong or Macao as the Seat of Arbitration by Hong Kong or Macao-Invested Enterprises Registered in the Mainland Part of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area” (Fa Shi No. 3 [2025]); and (2) “Opinion on Fully Leveraging the Functions of Arbitration to Serve the High-Quality Development of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area” jointly issued by the Supreme People’s Court and the Ministry of Justice.

According to the two documents issued by the Supreme People’s Court and the Ministry of Justice, the details of the expansion are as follows:

• The “allowing Hong Kong-invested enterprises to adopt Hong Kong law” measure is extended from Qianhai, Shenzhen to the whole of Shenzhen and Zhuhai municipalities. After the expansion, where either party or both parties are Hong Kong-invested enterprises registered in Shenzhen or Zhuhai, the parties may agree to choose Hong Kong or Macao law as the law applicable to the contract;

• The “allowing Hong Kong-invested enterprises to choose Hong Kong as the seat of arbitration” measure, previously applicable to Pilot Free Trade Zones in the Chinese Mainland, is further extended to nine Mainland municipalities in the GBA. After the expansion, where either party or both parties are Hong Kong-invested enterprises established and registered in any of the said municipalities, the parties may agree to choose Hong Kong or Macao as the seat of arbitration even in the absence of “Hong Kong/Macao-related elements”; and

• The definition of “Hong Kong-invested enterprise” is broadened: enterprises which are wholly or partially invested by natural persons, enterprises or other organisations from the Hong Kong SAR and are established and registered in the Chinese Mainland in accordance with its laws, may benefit from these measures.

Whether an enterprise can benefit from the above two measures depends on its place of registration and whether it is Hong Kong-invested as defined above. There are no restrictions on industry or case type. In other words, any Hong Kong-invested enterprise registered in a qualifying location can benefit from the respective measures.

(2) As the only common law jurisdiction in China, Hong Kong has a mature and modern arbitration system that is highly aligned with international best practice. In terms of legal framework, Hong Kong’s Arbitration Ordinance (Cap. 609) is based on the Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law, providing a basic legal framework for arbitration including judicial safeguards and support.

Under the principle of party autonomy, parties are free to choose the arbitral institutions, arbitration rules, etc to govern their specific arbitral proceedings. Arbitral institutions operate independently and are not subject to government interference.

According to the latest International Arbitration Survey conducted by Queen Mary University of London, Hong Kong is ranked the second most preferred seat of arbitration globally, along with Singapore. This reflects the maturity and comprehensiveness of Hong Kong’s arbitration legal framework, which is recognised by the international business community. Furthermore, the Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre Rules is ranked the second most preferred set of arbitration rules globally in the same survey, demonstrating the trust and willingness of parties from various jurisdictions to conduct arbitral proceedings in Hong Kong.

(3) Regarding the professional qualifications of arbitrators

To establish the Panel of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Arbitrators (Panel of GBA Arbitrators), the Department of Justice (DoJ) and the legal departments of Guangdong and Macao, have jointly promulgated the Working Guidelines on the Panel of GBA Arbitrators (Working Guidelines) on July 30, 2025. The Working Guidelines set out the criteria recognised by the three places for nominating arbitrators to ensure the professionalism of GBA arbitrators.

The criteria for nomination of GBA arbitrators include: (1) upholding the Constitution of the People’s Republic of China, the Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China, the Basic Law of the Macao Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China; (2) possessing good professional ethics with no record of disciplinary action for negative reputation or professional misconduct; (3) being included in the list of arbitrators by arbitral institutions in two out of the three places, namely Mainland, Hong Kong and Macao; (4) possessing more than five years of experience as an arbitrator; (5) having served as an arbitrator and drafted awards for at least five arbitration cases, of which at least three were cross-jurisdictional arbitration cases; (6) proficient in Putonghua (or Cantonese) and at least one language other than Chinese. 

The Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Legal Departments Joint Conference (Joint Conference) may, depending on the actual circumstances of the nominated arbitrator, exercise its discretion to exempt one or more of the requirement(s) among items (3) to (6) above. The legal departments of the three places may, having regard to their local actual circumstances, impose additional local criteria for nomination in addition to the above-mentioned unified criteria for nomination, and report to the Joint Conference for record.

The DoJ is actively liaising with the relevant authorities in Guangdong and Macao, aiming to establish the Panel of GBA Arbitrators before the end of this year, and to encourage the use of arbitration in the GBA and provide greater convenience for users.

Regarding talent admission mechanisms

The Government is committed to strengthening Hong Kong’s position as an international legal and dispute resolution services centre and has introduced a series of policies to attract and facilitate international arbitration experts to conduct arbitration-related work in Hong Kong.

The Government promulgated the first Talent List of Hong Kong in 2018, aiming to attract high quality talents more effectively and in a focused manner to support Hong Kong’s high value-added and diversified economy. The Talent List has been continuously updated and refined. Under the current Talent List, arbitrators specialising in resolving international commercial, financial and investor-state disputes are already included in the category of Dispute Resolution Professionals.

The Government has also regularised the Immigration Facilitation Scheme for Persons Participating in Arbitral Proceedings in Hong Kong (Scheme) with effect from March 1, 2025. Under the Scheme, relevant individuals are allowed to participate in arbitral proceedings in Hong Kong as visitors without the need to obtain an employment visa if they are in possession of a letter of proof issued by a designated arbitral and dispute resolution institution or venue provider proving that they are eligible persons participating in arbitral proceedings in Hong Kong.

This refined Scheme covers five categories of persons: (1) arbitrators; (2) expert and factual witnesses; (3) counsel in the arbitration; (4) parties to the arbitration; and (5) other persons directly related to or involved in the arbitration such as tribunal secretaries, tribunal-appointed experts. 

The Government will continue to closely monitor the implementation of the relevant policy initiatives, and review and refine them in a timely manner.

Monthly gravidtrap index for Aedes albopictus mosquitoes continues to drop in September

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region – 4

     The Food and Environmental Hygiene Department (FEHD) today (October 8) announced that the monthly gravidtrap index (MGI) for Aedes albopictus mosquitoes in September was 2.5 per cent, lower than the 5.3 per cent in August. This reflects the continued efforts by relevant government departments to intensify mosquito prevention and elimination operations, resulting in the improvement of the overall mosquito infestation situation this month. In addition, the FEHD has strengthened the dissemination of information on the gravidtrap index for Aedes albopictus mosquitoes so that more citizens can quickly grasp the mosquito infestation situation. The department will continue its mosquito control work to further reduce the risk of transmission of chikungunya fever (CF) and dengue fever (DF).

     In September, all 64 survey areas recorded an area gravidtrap index (AGI) lower than the alert level of 20 per cent. The decreases in the MGI and the AGI are attributable to the continuous and intensified mosquito prevention and elimination operations by various government departments and stakeholders, and may also have been affected by factors such as weather. The monthly rainfall was 528.7 millimetres in September, showing a decrease from the 939.2mm in August and 601.7mm in July. Overall, the MGI for Aedes albopictus mosquitoes in September was 2.5 per cent, at Level 1 (indicating the distribution of Aedes albopictus mosquitoes in the survey areas was not extensive). Relevant departments and stakeholders will persistently intensify mosquito prevention and elimination operations.

     Moreover, the monthly density index for Aedes albopictus in September was 1.1, which represented that an average of 1.1 Aedes albopictus adults were found in the Aedes-positive gravidtraps, indicating that the number of adult Aedes albopictus was not abundant in the survey areas.

     The FEHD currently makes regular announcements on gravidtrap indexes for Aedes albopictus on its webpage. To allow more citizens to quickly grasp the mosquito infestation situation, the FEHD has strengthened information dissemination by promptly announcing the latest gravidtrap indexes through press releases and social media.

     In addition, to further reduce the risk of transmission of CF, the FEHD has extended the intensified mosquito control work, which was originally activated when the AGI reaches 20 per cent, to cover areas with the AGI falling between 10 and 20 per cent. Specifically, the FEHD will conduct detailed risk assessments in the areas concerned to identify locations with higher mosquito infestation risks and, in collaboration with relevant departments and stakeholders, conduct intensive and targeted mosquito control work. The FEHD will also notify nearby housing estates, advising property management agents and residents to stay vigilant and work together to take mosquito prevention and elimination measures.

     To reduce the risk of transmission of CF and DF, the FEHD continues to step up mosquito prevention and control measures across all districts and to conduct vector investigations and targeted mosquito control operations within a 250 metre radius of the residence of patients and the places patients had visited during the infectious period, including removing mosquito breeding grounds, applying larvicides to stagnant water that cannot be cleared, and carrying out ultra-low volume fogging operations in adult mosquito habitats such as densely wooded areas, dark and secluded places, and abandoned structures to eliminate adult mosquitoes.

     The FEHD continues to conduct its three-phase Anti-mosquito Campaign this year. The third phase of the territory-wide campaign was launched on August 4 and will run until October 24. During the period, the district offices of the FEHD will target areas that have drawn particular concern, such as public markets, cooked food centres and hawker bazaars, single-block buildings, streets and back lanes, common parts of buildings, village houses, construction sites, vacant sites and road works sites to remove accumulated water and carry out mosquito prevention and control work. To further enhance the effectiveness of mosquito control, the FEHD and relevant government departments have carried out phase two of the All-out Anti-mosquito Operations from May 7. In addition to the work of phase one, including eliminating potential mosquito breeding places, the FEHD called on property management entities to arrange for necessary repairs to their premises to minimise mosquito breeding places and commence adult mosquito control measures by means of regular ultra-low volume fogging operations.

     The FEHD appeals to members of the public to continue to stay alert and work together to carry out mosquito prevention and control measures early, including inspecting their homes and surroundings to remove potential breeding grounds, changing water in vases and scrubbing their inner surfaces, removing water in saucers under potted plants at least once a week, and properly disposing of containers such as soft drink cans and lunch boxes. The FEHD also advises members of the public and estate management bodies to keep drains free of blockage and level all defective ground surfaces to prevent the accumulation of water. They should also scrub all drains and surface sewers with an alkaline detergent at least once a week to remove any mosquito eggs.

     Aedes albopictus is a kind of mosquito that can transmit DF and CF. DF is commonly found in tropical and subtropical regions of the world, and has become endemic in many countries in Southeast Asia. In 2024, the World Health Organization (WHO) recorded over 14 million cases, which was a record number. Additionally, according to the WHO, CF cases have been recorded in more than 110 countries/regions. Many countries worldwide experienced CF outbreaks this year, and as of August, over 317 000 cases had been reported in 16 countries/regions worldwide. The DF and CF activities in neighbouring areas have remained high. Members of the public should stay vigilant and continue to carry out effective mosquito prevention and control measures.

LCQ4: Providing facilitation for visitors coming to Hong Kong to participate in short-term activities

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region – 4

     Following is a question by the Hon Kenneth Fok and a written reply by the Secretary for Security, Mr Tang Ping-keung, in the Legislative Council today (October 8):
 
Question:
 
     There are views pointing out that the Immigration Facilitation Scheme for Visitors Participating in Short-term Activities in Designated Sectors (STV Scheme) launched by the Government aims to provide immigration facilitation arrangements to visitors invited or sponsored by authorised host organisations to come to Hong Kong for undertaking short-term activities which are beneficial to the development of Hong Kong and allow them to participate in specified activities in 12 designated sectors during the period of their stay as visitor, which is of positive significance in promoting Hong Kong to develop the “eight centres”. However, there are views pointing out that the 2025-2026 Budget proposes to introduce application fees for various talent admission schemes and increase visa fees, which will impose cost pressure on the organisations which have not been included in the list of authorised host organisations under the STV Scheme (unauthorised organisations). In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
 
(1) of the number of activities in which visitors coming to Hong Kong under the STV Scheme were allowed to participate in each of the past three years, with a breakdown by type of activities, duration of activities (i.e. 1 to 3 days, 4 to 7 days, 8 to 10 days, and over 10 days) and designated sector;
 
(2) since the introduction of application fees for talent admission schemes and increase in visa fees, whether the Government has assessed the financial burden imposed on unauthorised organisations by such arrangements, as well as the impact on the number of activities organised by such organisations, including the number of activities cancelled due to financial pressure arising from additional visa fees; if so, of the outcome;
 
(3) as some members of the industry have relayed that it may necessitate a reduction in international exchange activities due to the rising costs for visa application since organisations are required to apply for employment visas for visitors invited to Hong Kong to participate in short-term activities not covered by activities in the designated sectors under the STV Scheme, of the Government’s specific measures in place to support such organisations, such as introducing extremely short-term employment visas at lower costs and streamlining visa application procedures;
 
(4) to ensure that the STV Scheme remains relevant to industry needs, whether the Government has established mechanisms for regular review, including consulting the representatives from the relevant sectors to update the list of authorised host organisations; whether it will step up efforts in promoting the STV Scheme to the industry, so as to clearly explain the application eligibility and requirements, as well as the specific requirements for activities in each designated sector; and
 
(5) as there are views that since only four organisations are recognised as authorised host organisations in the “art and cultural” sector under the STV Scheme (namely the Culture, Sports and Tourism Bureau, Leisure and Cultural Services Department, Hong Kong Arts Development Council and West Kowloon Cultural District Authority), it is difficult for many arts and cultural groups (arts groups) to benefit from the STV Scheme, which is contrary to the original intent of the Scheme, whether the Government will review the selection mechanism for authorised host organisations, including expanding the coverage of authorised host organisations in the “art and cultural” sector to include other recognised arts groups; if so, of the details and timetable?
 
Reply:
 
President,
 
     To encourage more talent to come to Hong Kong for exchanges, the Government launched a two-year Pilot Scheme on Immigration Facilitation for Visitors Participating in Short-term Activities in Designated Sectors (Pilot Scheme) in June 2022, which was regularised as the Immigration Facilitation Scheme for Visitors Participating in Short term Activities in Designated Sectors (STV Scheme) in June 2024. Under the STV Scheme, organisations authorised by the relevant government bureaux/departments (B/Ds) can issue invitation letters to relevant non-local talent in their sectors. Invited persons may come to Hong Kong to participate in specified short-term activities as visitors without the need to apply for employment visas/entry permits from the Immigration Department (ImmD). They may participate in specified short term activities for up to 14 consecutive calendar days during each trip to Hong Kong, and receive remuneration for the specified activities concerned.
 
     In consultation with the Labour and Welfare Bureau (LWB) and the ImmD, my reply to various parts of the question raised by the Hon Kenneth Fok is as follows:
 
(1) As of end-June 2025, the Pilot Scheme/STV Scheme had benefited a total of 36 951 non-local talent, facilitating their entry into Hong Kong as visitors to participate in a total of over 6 200 short-term activities such as the International Chinese New Year Night Parade, the Asian Financial Forum, the Hong Kong Sevens and other major events. They participated in the relevant short-term activities in Hong Kong for about five days on average. The statistics by sector are at Annex. The ImmD does not maintain a breakdown of other statistics mentioned in the question.
 
(2) LWB indicates that in devising the fee levels for the various admission schemes for talent and capital investors, the Government has balanced various considerations, including the “user pays” principle, the fees charged for similar applications in overseas jurisdictions, and the impact on the applicants concerned.  In particular, noting that some applications relate to short-term/one-off project-based employment, in addition to application fee, the Government has introduced two tiers of visa/entry permit issuance fee: $600 for visa/entry permit granted with a limit of stay of not more than 180 days, and $1,300 for those with a limit of stay of 181 days or more. The fee levels are modest and affordable.
 
     Since the introduction of the relevant fees, the number of applications and visas/entry permits issued under the specified admission schemes in the past few months were comparable to those in the same period last year. The Government will closely monitor the relevant situation and review the fee structure as appropriate in accordance with the established mechanism.
 
(3) to (5) As above-mentioned, the Government will review the visa/entry permit fee structure for the various admission schemes for talent and capital investors as appropriate in accordance with the established mechanism.
 
     On the other hand, to ensure that the STV Scheme keeps pace with the times, the Government reviews its coverage and operation mechanism from time to time, with a view to ensuring that it can continue to effectively promote the development of relevant sectors and raise Hong Kong’s international profile while ensuring that the risks are manageable. Since the launch of the Pilot Scheme, the Government has expanded the scheme twice in February 2023 and June 2024, by adding two new sectors, namely “Finance” and “Development and Construction”, to the original 10 designated sectors. The number of authorised organisations has also increased by 18 per cent from around 350 when the scheme was first launched, to more than 400 at present. These authorised organisations include government B/Ds, public/statutory organisations, professional bodies and industry associations, etc. Through an established mechanism, all participating B/Ds would assist in ensuring that the implementation of the scheme consistently meets policy objectives. Relevant information of the STV Scheme, including the authorised organisations and specified short-term activities that are currently covered by the scheme, is available on the ImmD’s website: www.immd.gov.hk/eng/services/visas/stv.html.
 
     At present, different types of organisations can collaborate with authorised organisations under the scheme to organise eligible specified short-term activities, thereby benefiting from the relevant immigration facilitation. We welcome the industry to contact relevant B/Ds or authorised organisations in their respective sectors and consider co-organising eligible events, with a view to promoting more diverse forms of exchange and collaboration under the scheme.
 
     In considering whether to further relax the scheme, the Government shall take into account two major principles, including that eligible individuals visiting Hong Kong for specified short-term activities under the scheme will not displace the local workforce, and there will not be a risk of abuse (including illegal employment). The Government will continue to closely monitor the implementation of the STV Scheme as well as the views of the relevant departments and the sectors concerned, and timely review the scheme’s coverage to strike an appropriate balance between immigration control and facilitation.

LCQ7: Sales model of “blind boxes”

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region – 4

     Following is a question by Dr the Hon Hoey Simon Lee and a written reply by the Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development, Mr Algernon Yau, in the Legislative Council today (October 8):

Question:

     It is learnt that in recent years, the sale of products in the form of “blind boxes” (i.e. commodities whose contents are unidentifiable by consumers in advance) has become increasingly common among some merchants. However, such sales model has also aroused consumers’ concerns about their rights and interests as well as its impact on minors. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:

(1) whether the authorities have regulated the sales model of “blind boxes” under the current legal and regulatory framework;

(2) as there are views that under the sales model of “blind boxes”, consumers are more inclined to pursue the thrill and chance-taking mentality from not being able to identify the contents of the “blind box” items in advance rather than the items themselves, whether the Government has assessed the gambling elements that may be inherent in the sales model of “blind boxes” and its impact on minors;

(3) it is learnt that some European Union countries, Singapore and the Mainland have imposed regulation on the sale of “blind boxes”, whether the authorities will consider drawing on the experience of the aforesaid countries to improve the current regulatory framework for the sales model of “blind boxes”;

(4) it is learnt that in addition to “blind boxes” available for sale offline, consumers can also purchase “blind boxes” sold outside Hong Kong through online platforms, whether the authorities have assessed if the existing legislation and regulation are sufficient to guard against such risks relating to tax avoidance and prohibited articles that may be associated with “blind boxes” sold outside Hong Kong; and

(5) as the State Administration for Market Regulation issued the Guidelines on Rules for Blind Box Business Operations (for Trial Implementation) in June 2023, which include a specific negative sales list prohibiting the sale of certain commodities such as medicinal products, medical devices as well as flammables and explosives in the form of “blind boxes”, while also imposing restrictions on products such as cosmetics and food that have a bearing on public health, whether the Government will consider drawing on such practice to regulate the sales practice of commodities relating to public health and safety?

Reply:

President,

     Having consulted the Home Affairs and Youth Bureau, the Health Bureau, the Environment and Ecology Bureau, the Security Bureau, the Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau, and the Hong Kong Customs and Excise Department (C&ED), our consolidated reply to various parts of the question is as follows:

     The Government has been committed to safeguarding the rights and interests of consumers, and attaches great importance to the safety of products sold in the market. Regarding “blind boxes” which have gained popularity in recent years, we note that other jurisdictions, including the Mainland, have been regulating, among others, relevant sales practices and product safety.

     Currently, various laws are in place in Hong Kong to protect the rights and interests of consumers. Among others, the Trade Descriptions Ordinance (Cap. 362) prohibits traders from subjecting consumers to unfair trade practices, including false trade descriptions, misleading omissions, aggressive commercial practices, bait advertising, bait-and-switch and wrongly accepting payment. The Trade Descriptions Ordinance covers goods and services, and is applicable to the trade practices of both physical and online traders. A trader deploying any of the above unfair trade practices when selling “blind boxes” to consumers will contravene the law.

     The C&ED, as the principal enforcement agency of the Trade Descriptions Ordinance, has been actively combating unfair trade practices through enforcement actions, compliance promotion, and publicity and public education, with a view to protecting consumer rights and interests. If a trader is suspected of having engaged in unfair trade practices, the C&ED will take enforcement actions decisively. On the other hand, the Consumer Council endeavours to study and promote the protection of consumers’ rights and interests, including handling consumer complaints concerning goods and services. If consumers suspect that a trader is engaging in unfair trade practices when selling “blind boxes”, they could report the matter to the C&ED or file a complaint with the Council.

     In addition, at present, various laws in Hong Kong regulate the safety of different types of products or articles. Any person supplying relevant products or articles to consumers, regardless of the form, packaging and sales channel, is responsible for ensuring that their safety complies with the relevant legal requirements.

     In respect of toys products, the Toys and Children’s Products Safety Ordinance (Cap. 424) regulates the safety of toys, which are manufactured, imported or supplied for local use. The Toys and Children’s Products Safety (Additional Safety Standards or Requirements) Regulation also stipulates that a toy supplied in Hong Kong must carry information including identification markings (i.e. the full name and address of the manufacturer, importer or supplier) and the bilingual warnings or cautions (with respect to the safe keeping, use, consumption or disposal) applicable to the toy.

     For drugs (including pharmaceutical products and proprietary Chinese medicines (pCms)), the current regulations aim to ensure that drugs meet relevant standards for safety, quality and efficacy, thereby safeguarding public health and safety. They must be registered under the Pharmacy and Poisons Ordinance (Cap. 138) (PPO) or the Chinese Medicine Ordinance (Cap. 549) before they can be sold. All registered pharmaceutical products and pCms must bear labels that correspond to the registration particulars, clearly stating information such as the Hong Kong registration number, product name, active ingredients, manufacturer information, etc. Selling drugs in the form of “blind boxes” may violate relevant legislation. When purchasing drugs, members of the public should carefully read the information on the packaging labels, and should not buy or use products of doubtful composition or from unknown sources.

     As regards medical devices, some products are already regulated by existing legislation, including the PPO, the Consumer Goods Safety Ordinance (Cap. 456) and the Trade Descriptions Ordinance etc, depending on the characteristics and features of the products concerned. Before purchasing and using medical devices, members of the public should also thoroughly familiarise themselves with the product to ensure it meets their needs. The Government is actively developing Hong Kong into an international health and medical innovation hub, and will set up the Hong Kong Centre for Medical Products Regulation in 2026, implement “primary evaluation” for new drug registration in phases and submit a legislative proposal on regulating medical devices, to enhance medical products regulation.

     As regards dangerous goods, the Dangerous Goods Ordinance (Cap. 295) and its subsidiary legislation regulate the manufacture, storage, conveyance and use of dangerous goods (including explosives and inflammable substances). A trader supplying any dangerous goods regulated under the above legislation in the form of “blind boxes” must comply with the legal requirements. If the articles inside the “blind boxes” are commonly used in daily life and available in retail stores (such as alcohol handrub/sanitiser, glue, etc), and the container sizes of which do not exceed the maximum package size specified in the Dangerous Goods (Application and Exemption) Regulation 2012, they are classified as dangerous goods in consumer packs, and will be exempted from the packing, marking and labelling requirements.

     As regards food, according to the Public Health and Municipal Services Ordinance (Cap. 132), all food sold in Hong Kong shall be safe for human consumption. It must also comply with the subsidiary legislation under the aforementioned ordinance concerning food safety and food safety standards. Specifically, according to the Food and Drugs (Composition and Labelling) Regulations, unless exempted, the labelling or marking of the prepackaged food for sale in Hong Kong, whether in the form of “blind boxes” or not, must include relevant information, including indication of durability, statement of special conditions for storage or instructions for use, information on energy value and nutrient content, etc, in either the English or the Chinese language or in both languages.

     Moreover, the safety of consumer goods which are ordinarily supplied for private use in Hong Kong, if not covered by other legislation, is subject to the regulation of the Consumer Goods Safety Ordinance and its subsidiary legislation, the Consumer Goods Safety Regulation. Pursuant to the Consumer Goods Safety Ordinance, manufacturers, importers and suppliers should ensure that the consumer goods they supply are reasonably safe. The Consumer Goods Safety Regulation stipulates that any warning or caution marked on the package of consumer goods must be in both the English and the Chinese languages in a legible and conspicuous manner.

     The Government will continue to closely monitor the trends of unfair trade practices and the latest requirements for safety standards of various articles to formulate appropriate strategies, thereby protecting consumers’ rights and interests and safety.

     Furthermore, there are strict regulations in Hong Kong on the import and export of all prohibited/controlled items and dutiable commodities. These regulations are applicable to all modes of import and export, including articles purchased through cross-border electronic commerce platforms. According to the Import and Export Ordinance (Cap. 60), import and export of all controlled items (including dangerous drugs, arms, ammunition, weapons, controlled chemicals, pharmaceuticals, and animals and plants, etc) must be accompanied by a valid licence or permit issued by the relevant authorities. Any person who brings any controlled item into/out of Hong Kong (whether by person, by post, or through purchasing agents or consolidated consignments) without a valid licence or permit may be prosecuted, in addition to confiscation of the subject item. In terms of tax, apart from four categories of dutiable commodities that are subject to duty under the Dutiable Commodities Ordinance (Cap. 109) (i.e. liquor, tobacco, hydrocarbon and methyl alcohol), Hong Kong does not impose duty on any other imported or exported goods. Any person who imports or exports dutiable goods must obtain a valid permit from the C&ED and make proper declaration on the manifest. For consumption of dutiable goods in Hong Kong, one must ensure that the relevant duty has been duly paid.