Category: MIL-OSI

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

     Following is a question by the Hon Sunny Tan and a written reply by the Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development, Mr Algernon Yau, in the Legislative Council today (April 16):
 
Question:
 
     There are views that the fruitful results of Invest Hong Kong (InvestHK) in attracting enterprises and investments last year demonstrate that overseas and Mainland enterprises have full confidence in Hong Kong. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
 
(1) as InvestHK indicated last year that it would first focus on attracting medium-sized Mainland enterprises that had needs to go global to invest in Hong Kong, and it has been reported that the number of micro, small and medium-enterprises on the Mainland exceeds 52 million, of the authorities’ deployment for the aforesaid work;
 
(2) as it has been reported that some enterprises face problems in aspects such as talents, supporting resources and financing in Hong Kong when establishing presence in Hong Kong, and the Secretary for Innovation, Technology and Industry has pointed out the need for the entire Government to be involved in resolving such problems, whether the authorities have conducted an in-depth study on the problems and difficulties encountered by Mainland enterprises when establishing presence in Hong Kong; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that;
 
(3) as the 2024 Policy Address proposes that InvestHK and the Hong Kong Trade Development Council will set up a mechanism to provide one-stop, diversified professional advisory services for enterprises in Hong Kong looking to go global, whether the authorities have conducted a comparative analysis of the effectiveness of Mainland enterprises venturing overseas markets directly vis-a-vis doing so through Hong Kong, so as to grasp Hong Kong’s advantages; and
 
(4) whether it will consider identifying the problems faced by Mainland enterprises venturing overseas markets when establishing presence in Hong Kong, and strengthening cross-departmental collaboration among various policy bureaux and government departments having regard to the needs of enterprises in terms of products, production, talents, as well as financial, legal, dispute resolution and other professional services relating to venturing overseas markets, so as to formulate targeted relief policies and helping measures, such as providing more targeted talent and fund matching services; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that?
 
Reply:
 
President,
 
     According to the latest annual survey jointly conducted by Invest Hong Kong (InvestHK) and the Census and Statistics Department, the number of companies in Hong Kong with overseas or Mainland parent companies rose to 9 960 in 2024, reaching a record high. The number of start-ups in Hong Kong also increased to a record high of almost 4 700 in the same year.
 
     In 2024, InvestHK assisted 539 Mainland or overseas enterprises in establishing and expanding their businesses in Hong Kong, representing an increase of over 40 per cent as compared with the full year figure of 2023. On a pro-rata basis, the figure well exceeded the performance indicator as set out in the 2022 Policy Address by the Chief Executive. Among those 539 companies, 273 of them were from the Mainland.
 
     The above fruitful investment promotion results fully demonstrate InvestHK’s work achievements and that Mainland and overseas enterprises continue to have full confidence in Hong Kong despite geopolitical impact. Those enterprises have selected Hong Kong as their base to expand regional businesses in Asia so as to leverage the commercial values that Hong Kong could offer as a “super connector” and a “super value-adder” when assisting their global business expansion.
 
     In response to the Hon Sunny Tan’s question, our reply is as follows:
 
     The global trade landscape and geopolitics are rapidly changing, with parts of the supply chains shifting to the Global South and Belt and Road countries, while Mainland enterprises are also proactively establishing their presence abroad. According to statistics, there are currently more than 50 000 medium-sized manufacturing enterprises in the Pearl River Delta and the Yangtze River Delta alone, many of which involve overseas operations and have the need to go global with some of their manufacturing processes. Hong Kong’s rich experience in international trade and world-class professional services will be of assistance to such enterprises in seizing business opportunities when they plan to cope with the aforesaid changes.
 
     It was announced in the 2024-25 Budget that the Government’s goal was to develop Hong Kong into a multinational supply chain management centre. In his 2024 Policy Address, the Chief Executive further requested InvestHK and the Hong Kong Trade Development Council (HKTDC) to set up a high value-added supply chain services mechanism for attracting Mainland enterprises to establish international or regional headquarters in Hong Kong for managing offshore trading and supply chain, and providing one-stop professional advisory services for enterprises in Hong Kong looking to go global. In December 2024, InvestHK and the HKTDC established the above mechanism. The two agencies are also proactively collaborating with relevant “Team Hong Kong” organisations, including the Hong Kong Export Credit Insurance Corporation (ECIC), the Hong Kong Productivity Council, etc., to jointly support those Mainland enterprises in Hong Kong to go global.
 
     Despite that those Mainland enterprises would need to react to the United States’ tariffs imposed on different regions by re-constructing their supply chain networks, Hong Kong’s rich experience in international trade and world-class professional services allow it to become the destination for international or regional headquarters of those enterprises to manage offshore trading and supply chain. The enterprises could also leverage Hong Kong as a springboard for their multinational business development. On the one hand, through its Dedicated Teams for Attracting Businesses and Talents based in the Mainland Offices, InvestHK is proactively organising activities under the theme of multinational supply chain, so as to actively reach out to more Mainland enterprises for investment promotion work. As at end-February 2025, InvestHK had organised and co-organised around 20 relevant investment promotion activities in various Mainland cities, including Hangzhou, Nanjing and Xiamen, etc. within around one year’s time. InvestHK will identify Mainland enterprises wishing to go global through various activities and attract them to use Hong Kong as a platform for them to develop overseas businesses and establish supply chain.
 
     On the other hand, the HKTDC is providing one-stop professional advisory services for enterprises in Hong Kong. Towards enterprises with plans of going global, the HKTDC will, through its overseas offices, render on-site support services. These include assisting enterprises in establishing connections with overseas markets and understanding overseas laws and regulations; providing market research covering various emerging markets such as the Middle East, Central Asia and Latin America; as well as providing information on various areas including environmental, social and governance (ESG), testing and certification and export credit risk management. Furthermore, in view that Hong Kong’s business sector possesses rich knowledge and profound experience in compliance, labour protection and environmental protection of overseas markets, the HKTDC facilitates collaboration between enterprises and different organisations and industry stakeholders to provide ESG training, etc. for Mainland enterprises seeking to expand their reach to overseas markets. This will help them build goodwill with business partners and expand their markets.
 
     Besides, the ECIC will provide credit insurance for export services relating to multinational supply chain so as to render more comprehensive support for enterprises seeking to go global. To assist Hong Kong exporters in expanding into Mainland and emerging markets, the ECIC has also increased the number of free buyer credit checks from 12 to 20.
 
     In fact, Hong Kong’s advantages for assisting Mainland enterprises to go global are very obvious and important. Apart from possessing quality talents who have rich experience in offshore trading and supply chain management and the relevant network, Hong Kong has the distinctive advantages of enjoying strong support of the motherland and being closely connected to the world, as well as plays the important roles as a “super connector” and a “super value-adder”, under “one country, two systems”. All these make Hong Kong a two-way springboard for Mainland enterprises to go global and for attracting overseas enterprises. Hong Kong’s institutional fundamentals, including the exercise of the common law system, independent Judiciary, a favourable business environment with efficient and transparent markets, a regulatory regime in line with international rules, a simple and low tax system, world-class professional services, and free flow of goods and factors of production including talents, capital and information, as well as key national strategies, including the National 14th Five-Year Plan, the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area development and the Belt and Road Initiative, provide Hong Kong with unlimited opportunities and make it the only economy in the world where the global advantage and the China advantage come together.
 
     In addition, Hong Kong’s advantages and experiences especially meet the needs of small and medium enterprises from the Mainland (Mainland SMEs). Mainland SMEs’ demand for high value-added supply chain services is also consistent with InvestHK’s observations. During the past year, the Department noted at various investment promotion events that many Mainland SMEs had, upon understanding the aforementioned advantages of Hong Kong and the professional services it could offer, concurred that it would be far more effective and convenient for them to go global via Hong Kong instead of venturing overseas markets direct by themselves. They also expressed interest in establishing headquarters in Hong Kong for managing their offshore trading and supply chain. InvestHK and the HKTDC will provide these enterprises with one-stop supply chain advisory services and other relevant assistance through the high value-added supply chain services mechanism.
 
     To further step up co-ordination between bureaux and departments, with the support of the Financial Secretary, InvestHK set up an inter-departmental/agency referral mechanism led by the Director-General of Investment Promotion last year. By proactively collecting Mainland and overseas enterprises’ concerns and pain points when they plan to establish presence in Hong Kong, InvestHK reflects them to relevant bureaux, departments or agencies accordingly for exploring suitable solutions as appropriate. Since the establishment of the mechanism more than half a year ago, various issues have been successfully addressed to meet the needs of the trade, including opening of bank accounts, application and work arrangements for imported workers, application for use of vacant land, thereby facilitating Mainland and overseas enterprises to set up and expand their businesses in Hong Kong.
 
     Looking ahead, InvestHK will ride on the good momentum of 2024 and make every effort in attracting more Mainland and overseas enterprises to invest in Hong Kong, so as to continue to implement the performance indicator as set out in the 2022 Policy Address. At the same time, the Department will continue to work with relevant “Team Hong Kong” organisations to further enhance the high value-added supply chain services mechanism in order to attract and assist more Mainland enterprises looking to go global to come to Hong Kong and make good use of the city as a springboard to develop their multinational businesses. This will be conducive to Hong Kong’s economic development on the one hand, and facilitate the deepening of its international exchanges and co-operation on the other hand, thus responding to meet Premier Li Qiang’s expectations for Hong Kong, as set out in his work report this year, integrating into the overall national development while making contribution to the country.

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

     Following is a question by the Hon Chan Pui-leung and a written reply by the Secretary for Health, Professor Lo Chung-mau, in the Legislative Council today (April 16):
 
Question:
 
     There are views pointing out that patients with depression and treatment-resistant depression (i.e. those who have not shown significant improvement despite two trials of antidepressants at adequate doses, duration and adherence) face higher suicide rates if their condition cannot be controlled, and this will also have far-reaching and adverse impacts on the quality of life for both the patients as well as their families. Therefore, in order to render more effective support for patients with depression and promote mental health for all, it is crucial to provide appropriate treatments for depression and keep track of patients’ data. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
 
(1) whether it knows the respective numbers of people admitted to public hospitals in each of the past three years due to depression and treatment-resistant depression, and their respective average numbers of days of hospitalisation; if there are no relevant statistics, whether the authorities will track such data in a systematic manner in the future; and
 
(2) given that in the reply to a question from a Member of this Council on March 13 last year, the authorities indicated that in 2023-2024 (as at the end of February 2024), only 17 patients had been prescribed the nasal spray medication, Esketamine, for treatment of depression, representing a significant disparity compared to the number of patients with depression and potential treatment-resistant depression in Hong Kong, whether the authorities know the reasons for the low usage rate of such medication by the Hospital Authority (HA), and whether the HA will increase the use of nasal spray antidepressants in the future?
 
Reply:
 
President,
 
     The reply to the question raised by the Hon Chan Pui-leung is as follows:
 
(1) The Hospital Authority (HA) adopts an integrated and multi-disciplinary approach in providing mental health services. A team comprising psychiatrists, psychiatric nurses, clinical psychologists, occupational therapists and medical social workers provides a comprehensive range of medical services, including inpatient services, outpatient services, day rehabilitation training and community support services, to patients with mental health needs (including patients with depression) according to their medical conditions and clinical needs. 
 
     The table below sets out the number of discharges and deaths of hospitalised patients with principal diagnosis of depression (including treatment-resistant depression) from 2022-23 to 2024-25 (up to December 31, 2024) and their average length of stay in hospitals:
 

Note 1: In the HA, day inpatients refer to those who are admitted to hospitals for non-emergency treatment and discharged within the same day. Inpatients are those who are admitted to hospitals via Accident and Emergency Departments or those who have stayed for more than one day. The calculation of inpatient average length of stay does not include that of day patients.
Note 2: The HA does not maintain statistics relating to treatment-resistant depression. 
Note 3: In view of the COVID-19 epidemic outbreak in Hong Kong in early 2020, the HA adjusted its services to cope with the outbreak. This should therefore be taken into consideration when comparing the service capacity of the HA in the respective years. With the subsiding of local COVID-19 epidemic situation and cessation of anti-epidemic measures in early 2023, the HA has been gradually resuming provision of all of its public healthcare services to tie in with the Government’s normalcy measures.
 
(2) A number of drugs can be used for treatment of depression and different drugs have their efficacy and limitations. Nasal spray antidepressant (Esketamine) is one of the drugs. The nasal spray antidepressant (Esketamine) has been included in the HA Drug Formulary since July 2023.The respective numbers of patients prescribed with nasal spray antidepressant (Esketamine) in the HA in 2023-24 and 2024-25 (projection as at December 31, 2024) were approximately 20.

     The HA currently provides drugs, Electroconvulsive Therapy and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the treatment of depression. Healthcare professionals will arrange appropriate treatment to patients with depression according to their medical conditions, clinical needs and risks, as well as taking into the consideration the patients’ preferences. The HA has been expanding the coverage of its Drug Formulary through an established mechanism to provide long-term sustainable, affordable and appropriate support to patients with mental health needs.
 
     The HA will continue to review its mental health services and treatment options (including treatment of depression) according to latest scientific evidence and clinical needs to provide appropriate support to patients in need.

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

Source: Government of India

Posted On: 16 APR 2025 1:33PM by PIB Delhi

The Prime Minister, Shri Narendra Modi today shared an article by Union Minister Shri Arjun Ram Meghwal on how Dr. Ambedkar shaped some of India’s earliest and most impactful economic ideas rooted in justice, dignity and self-reliance.

The Prime Minister’s Office handle on X posted:

“Union Minister Shri @arjunrammeghwal elaborates on how Dr. Ambedkar shaped some of India’s earliest and most impactful economic ideas rooted in justice, dignity and self-reliance.
https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/arjun-ram-meghwal-writes-ambedkar-the-economist-9946393/ 

via NaMo App”

***

MJPS/SR

(Release ID: 2122045) Visitor Counter : 140

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

     Following is a question by the Hon Chan Hoi-yan and a written reply by the Secretary for Labour and Welfare, Mr Chris Sun, in the Legislative Council today (April 16):
 
Question:
 
     It is learnt that new public toilets built by the Government generally adhere to the requirements of the Buildings Department’s “Design Manual: Barrier Free Access 2008” and include accessible toilets. However, some wheelchair users have relayed that some of these toilets are not equipped with power-operated doors and significant physical strength are required to open the doors, thereby causing inconvenience to users. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
 
(1) of the respective numbers of public toilets and accessible toilets currently managed by the Food and Environmental Hygiene Department, the Leisure and Cultural Services Department and the Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department and, among them, the number of accessible toilets equipped with power-operated doors;
 
(2) of the expenditures/estimates involved for constructing public toilets (including modification and refurbishment works) by various government departments in the past year and the coming year;
 
(3) of the Government’s specific considerations in respect of the installation of power-operated doors in accessible toilets, and the average cost of installing each power-operated door;
 
(4) whether the Government will increase the number of accessible toilets equipped with power-operated doors; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that;
 
(5) of the following information on the accessible toilets managed by various government departments which have been suspended due to repair or other reasons in the past three years: the names and addresses of the public toilets in which they are located, and the total number of days suspended;
 
(6) of the respective average daily usage of various public toilets of the Government that have been installed with the Smart Public Toilet System and the accessible toilets in these public toilets in the past three years; and
 
(7) of the number of complaints received by various government departments about the use of accessible toilets in public toilets under their management in the past three years, as well as the major subject matters of such complaints; whether the Government has formulated clear guidelines and provided relevant training for frontline cleaning staff to improve the management of these public toilets; if so, of the details of the relevant training (including the training contents as well as the number of training and participants); if not, the reasons for that?
 
Reply:
 
President,
 
     The Government is committed to providing a barrier-free environment for persons with disabilities, so as to enable them to have a barrier-free access to premises and make use of the facilities and services on an equal basis with others, thereby enabling them to live independently and fully integrate into the community.
 
     At present, the provision of accessible toilets is a statutory requirement under the Third Schedule to Regulation 72 of the Building (Planning) Regulations (Cap. 123F), while the provision of power-operated doors for accessible toilets is a recommended best practice under Division 11 of Chapter 4 of the Design Manual: Barrier Free Access 2008 (2024 edition) (Design Manual). The Buildings Department commissioned a consultant in February 2024 to review the Design Manual (including the design requirements for accessible toilets) with the objective of enhancing the standards of barrier-free facilities in private buildings by integrating universal design concepts to meet the latest needs and international trends, and ensuring that the standards are feasible and pragmatic for implementation in the local context. The consultancy study is expected to be completed in the first quarter of 2026.
 
     The Government does not maintain a consolidated list of public toilets and accessible toilets managed by various bureaux and departments. That said, the vast majority of public toilets and toilet facilities (including accessible toilets) provided for public use in public venues are managed by the Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department (AFCD), the Food and Environmental Hygiene Department (FEHD), the Home Affairs Department (HAD) and the Leisure and Cultural Services Department (LCSD). Having consulted the relevant bureaux/departments, I set out below a consolidated reply to the Member’s question:
 
(1) At present, the numbers of public toilets, accessible toilets and the latter equipped with power-operated doors managed by the AFCD and the FEHD are as follows:
 

     The LCSD also provides about 1 100 toilets in its leisure, sports and cultural facilities for use by service users. The vast majority of which are furnished with accessible toilets, and among these accessible toilets, about 40 are equipped with power-operated doors.
 
(2) The expenditure and estimates of the construction of public toilets (including conversion and refurbishment projects) under the AFCD and the FEHD in 2024-25 and 2025-26 are as follows:
 

     When developing new or renovating existing leisure, sports and cultural facilities, the LCSD will provide barrier-free ancillary facilities as appropriate, including accessible toilets. The relevant construction costs are part of the overall project estimates, and the LCSD does not maintain breakdown figures.
 
(3) and (4) According to the Design Manual, the installation of power-operated doors in accessible toilets is a recommended best practice rather than a mandatory requirement. That said, it is the established policy of the Government to follow the recommended best practices in the Design Manual, and where practicable, achieve a higher standard than the statutory requirements in the provision of barrier-free facilities. When considering whether to install power-operated doors in accessible toilets, the departments concerned will take into account a basket of factors, including the usage rate of public toilets, power supply and whether the physical environment (such as location in the suburbs) allows stable operation of power-operated doors. The departments concerned will continue to timely review the usage of accessible toilets and the needs of users, and install power-operated doors in accessible toilets as appropriate. In general, the existing cost of installing each power-operated door is about $50,000 to $60,000.
 
(5) Information on the accessible toilets managed by the AFCD, the FEHD and the HAD that had been temporarily suspended for maintenance in the past three years are at Annexes 1 to 3 respectively.

     Regarding the accessible toilets provided by the LCSD in its leisure, sports and cultural facilities, being part of the facilities/venues, they will not be available for use when the facilities/venues concerned are undergoing repair, renovation and maintenance, etc. The LCSD does not maintain information on the temporary suspension of accessible toilets due to maintenance.
 
(6) The average daily usage of public toilets installed with the Smart Public Toilet System and the accessible toilets in these public toilets managed by the FEHD in the past three years are at Annex 4.
 
​Besides, the LCSD has also installed smart systems in the toilets provided in its leisure, sports and cultural facilities, of which seven are located in Kowloon Park and two in Tsuen Wan Sports Centre and Hong Kong Cultural Centre respectively. The LCSD does not maintain information on the average daily usage of these toilets.

(7) In the past three years, the number of complaints about accessible toilets received by the AFCD, the FEHD, the HAD and the LCSD are as follows:
 

     The complaints were mainly about damaged facilities, insufficient facilities, cleanliness, etc. The departments concerned will follow up the complaints and urge cleansing service contractors to deliver the services, and arrange and provide relevant training for their frontline cleansing staff in accordance with the contractual requirements (including the level of cleanliness and service frequency). Site inspections and surprise checks will also be conducted by the departments concerned from time to time to better monitor the contractors’ service performance and ensure service quality. Besides, the FEHD has added new clauses in the dedicated contract for cleansing and management services for public toilets, requiring contractors’ toilet attendants to have received relevant vocational training and possess recognised qualifications.

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

     Following is a question by the Hon Elizabeth Quat and a written reply by the Secretary for Education, Dr Choi Yuk-lin, in the Legislative Council today (April 16):

Question:

     According to a research publication released by the Legislative Council Secretariat in October last year, the number of student deaths by suicide in Hong Kong has almost tripled in 10 years to reach at least a decade high of 32 cases in 2023. In addition, it has been reported that from the beginning of the current school year until last month, there have been nearly 20 fatal suicide cases involving students under the age of 19. Regarding the promotion of mental health among students, will the Government inform this Council:

(1) whether it has compiled statistics on the number of primary, secondary and university students who planned or attempted suicide in the past three years, and among them, the respective numbers of those with special educational needs or a history of mental health issues; whether it has studied the reasons behind these students’ suicide plans or attempts, with a breakdown by primary, secondary and university students;

(2) whether, in response to the reasons behind the suicide plans or attempts mentioned in (1), the Government will strengthen relevant targeted measures or support services to reduce the likelihood of student suicide; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that;

(3) given that in the reply to a question from a Member of this Council on June 5 last year, the Government indicated that it would engage a consultant to evaluate the effectiveness of the Three-tier School-based Emergency Mechanism, of the results of the evaluation; given that the mechanism is set to expire at the end of this year, whether the Government will explore regularising the mechanism; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that;

(4) as there are views that “schooling problems”, “family relationships” and “interpersonal relationships” are the main reasons for student suicides, (i) whether the Government will study promoting education reform or developing quantifiable indicators for schools to formulate appropriate school-based assignment policies, so as to reduce the learning pressure on students in the long term; and (ii) what targeted measures the Government has in place to combat bullying in schools, in order to safeguard the mental health of students;

(5) whether it will conduct studies to improve the Three-tier Support Model (i.e. the three levels of “Universal”, “Selective” and “Indicated”) which the Education Bureau has encouraged schools to adopt to promote student mental health, including organising an off-campus support network through cross-departmental, cross-professional and cross-sectoral co-operation to enhance support for schools; and

(6) whether it will deploy additional school-based professional counsellors to provide immediate consultation and referral services, and encourage community members, parents and other stakeholders to show greater concern for the issue of student suicide, thereby widening the support available to schools?

Reply:

President,

     The Education Bureau (EDB) attaches great importance to the mental health of students, and has been proactively providing support for schools in adopting the Whole School Approach at three levels, namely “Universal”, “Selective” and “Indicated” (Three-tier Support Model), to promote student mental health and enhance support for those with mental health needs (including those with suicidal risks). The EDB also collaborates with other bureaux/departments and different stakeholders to take care of students with mental health needs and provide them with support in different aspects through cross-departmental, multi-disciplinary and cross-sector collaboration. In consultation with the Health Bureau, our reply to the question raised by the Hon Elizabeth Quat is as follows:

(1) As indicated in relevant international and local studies, suicide (including suicidal attempts) is a complicated issue caused by the interplay of multiple factors which are interconnected. These factors are mainly related to interpersonal relationships (including family, social and relationship problems) and personal issues (such as learning and school adjustment, depressed mood and mental illness). Therefore, suicide should not be attributed to any one single factor (such as special educational need or mental illness). The EDB has all along been requiring primary and secondary schools to report suspected fatal suicide cases of students in order to provide appropriate professional support to the schools concerned. However, it is not mandatory for schools to report attempted or planned suicide cases of students, and the EDB does not collect information on cases involving university students.

(2) to (6) Cross-departmental, multi-disciplinary and cross-sector collaboration

     The Government has been supporting student mental health through cross-departmental and cross-sector collaboration, and established the Advisory Committee on Mental Health (ACMH) in December 2017 to advise the Government on mental health policies. Among others, the EDB, the Department of Health (DH) and the Social Welfare Department (SWD) have also appointed representatives as ex-officio members of the ACMH to enhance cross-departmental collaboration and facilitate information sharing and co-ordination among departments, with a view to enhancing synergy.

     At school level, based on the recommendations of the Committee on Prevention of Student Suicides, the EDB adopts the Three-tier Support Model through the Whole School Approach and multi-disciplinary collaboration to promote mental health and provide support for students with mental health needs. The Government continues to allocate additional resources to enhance the guidance services in schools. Apart from strengthening teachers’ training, schools have also set up multi-disciplinary teams (including school-based educational psychologists, guidance personnel and school social workers) to provide appropriate support for students with mental health needs. If students are found to be emotionally disturbed, teachers will refer them to professionals in a timely manner. Starting from the 2016/17 school year, the School-based Educational Psychology Service has covered all public sector ordinary primary and secondary schools in Hong Kong. In addition, the EDB and the SWD have been implementing the “one school social worker for each school” and “two school social workers for each school ” measures in primary and secondary schools respectively. Each school may, according to its circumstances and students’ needs, flexibly deploy related resources, pool together other school resources, or make better use of community resources and professional support, to employ qualified student guidance personnel or procure related services from organisations to enhance the support for students.

     Implemented in all secondary schools in Hong Kong since December 2023, the Three-tier School-based Emergency Mechanism (the Mechanism) is one of the Government’s measures to promote cross-departmental, multi-disciplinary and cross-sector collaboration. The Mechanism aims to, through collaboration among schools, parents and other stakeholders in society, pool together the schools’ multi-disciplinary teams, the off-campus support network and medical services to achieve early identification and offer support to students at higher suicidal risk. After reviewing relevant circumstances and gauging the views of the sector, the Government decided to extend the implementation period of the Mechanism to the end of 2025 and enhance the related arrangements including strengthening cross-departmental collaboration. The Government has commissioned a study to evaluate the effectiveness of the Mechanism, and would closely monitor the overall operation and sustainability of the Mechanism by making reference to the evaluation results.

Three-tier Support Model

     Under the Three-tier Support Model, the EDB continues to enhance the curriculum, information dissemination, activities, training and professional support on an ongoing basis to promote student mental health. Measures being implemented in the 2024/25 school year include:
 

• Implementing the 4Rs Mental Health Charter (the Charter) to promote mental health in schools in a more comprehensive and systematic manner. As at the end of March 2025, more than 690 schools have participated in the Charter, with a number of partner organisations providing various activities. Schools participating in the Charter also make a pledge to join the Whole School Health Programme taken forward by the DH, thereby taking care of the health of students and school personnel in a comprehensive manner. 
• Launching the Mental Health Literacy resource packages for students at different learning stages, as well as the one-stop student mental health information website, “Mental Health@School” (mentalhealth.edb.gov.hk), to facilitate teachers, students, parents and the general public to select appropriate resources and strategies. 
• Collaborating with the SWD to arrange for non-government organisations to visit secondary schools in need to organise mental health-related activities since February 2024, with a view to enhancing students’ awareness of mental health and help-seeking. In addition, the EDB has collaborated with the Shall We Talk Initiative to arrange athletes to visit secondary schools to share the themes of positive thinking and perseverance so as to promote students’ resilience.
• Organising about 40 additional thematic teacher training workshops to introduce practical skills, counselling techniques and intervention strategies in supporting students with mental health needs. The EDB also regularly shares the latest information and relevant resources through the “Mental Health@School” Teacher Professional Network, as well as organises thematic workshops for the Teacher Professional Network.
• Promoting parent education through organising the “Caring for Their Heart and Soul, Growing along with Your Children” Parent Education Talk Series for parents of primary and secondary school students in the 2024/25 school year, so as to assist parents to acquire the knowledge and skills in supporting the healthy development of their children and taking care of their children’s mental health.

School curriculum and assignments

     The aim of education is to foster proper values and positive attitude in students, while leading a healthy lifestyle is one of the learning goals of school curriculum. The EDB released the Primary Education Curriculum Guide (PECG) in 2024, in which clear guidelines and recommended measures for optimising the school assignment policy are provided. The PECG emphasises that schools should adopt the principle of “quality rather than the quantity that matters” in the design and arrangement of homework. Schools should formulate a school-based mechanism to avoid assigning excessive homework to students and monitor the implementation and effectiveness of the mechanism, with a view to creating more space for students. Schools should also arrange a tutorial session in the afternoon as far as possible for students to finish some or all of their homework under teachers’ guidance. The Secondary Education Curriculum Guide (2017) also stresses the importance of prioritising quality over quantity in homework, suggesting that balanced development and healthy lifestyle of students should be schools’ major concerns in setting their homework policy. Excessive homework should be avoided so that students could have enough time for rest, play and leisure. The EDB also reminds schools to review their prevailing assessment policies, including the frequency of dictations, tests and examinations, as well as the contents, scopes and modes of assessment. Measures include replacing traditional written tests and examinations with flexible and diversified modes of assessment; arranging less dictations, tests and examinations, or cancelling term examinations for individual year levels, particularly Primary One, where diversified modes of assessment instead of tests and examinations should be adopted in the first school term. Assessment at different key stages should be planned and arranged in a progressive manner to alleviate the academic pressure on students.

     Apart from the enhanced School Development and Accountability framework to promote self-improvement of schools in related areas, the EDB has also been promulgating the above messages and good practices to schools with a view to creating space for students and promote their physical and psychological well-being through various channels, such as the Charter, circulars, letters, featured articles, video and comic series, and onsite workshops for teachers.

School bullying

     The EDB has all along been adopting a “zero tolerance” policy on school bullying and has been promoting a caring and harmonious school culture. In addition, we adopt a multi-pronged approach to implement the policy of preventing and handling school bullying, which includes providing schools with resource packages and teaching materials on the prevention of school bullying, helping schools develop school-based Peer Support networks, as well as launching the Peer Mediation Training Project for Peace Ambassadors and the Harmonious School Net. To further support students and parents in handling student peer conflicts or school bullying issues, the EDB has been providing the “Harmonious School: One-Stop Hotline and Counselling Services” since May 2024, for which registered social workers provide advice, counselling and case referral services for students and parents through the hotline and instant messaging software, as well as on-site support services for primary and secondary schools in need.

Source: Government of India

Posted On: 16 APR 2025 2:01PM by PIB Mumbai

Mumbai, 16 April 2025

Last Saturday, the city of Hyderabad witnessed an explosion of creativity & fandom as the World Audio Visual & Entertainment Summit (WAVES) Cosplay Championship Meetup unfolded at Mindspace Social. Organized by MEAI, Indian Comics Association, and Creators Street, powered by Epiko-con, and in collaboration with Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, TVAGA and Forbidden Verse, the event was a massive success, becoming a trending topic across cosplay communities and anime forums throughout the weekend.

Now, after an intensive nationwide hunt and a series of high-energy meetups across Hyderabad and Mumbai, the organizers have unveiled 29 of the most talented cosplayers who have earned their place on the final stage of the WAVES Cosplay Championship. These finalists will showcase their skills and creativity at Creatosphere during WAVES 2025.

Ajay Krishna, Founder of Forbidden Verse and one of the organizers for the Cosplay event, said that what makes this championship different from other such contests is that it is specially designed to shift the focus to Indian mythology and pop culture apart from the other popular characters that are portrayed regularly in other such events.

The next in line before the main championship at WAVES is the Mumbai Wildcard Meetup on 19th April. At this event, a select number of Wildcard Entries will be added to the finalists, bringing unexpected talent and raising the competition to an entirely new level. Prepare for a championship filled with surprises, intensity, and world-class cosplay!

Official Finalists:

1. KaizadSheshbaradaran – Mumbai
2. Puneeth V – Bengaluru
3. Shaikh Sameer Kalim – Latur
4. Tejal Sanjay Mulik – Mumbai
5. Anup Bhatia – Pune
6. Navdeep Singh Pannu – Mumbai
7. Akashi Gautam – Lucknow
8. Aditya Kalebere – Pune
9. Swaraj Kalebere – Pune
10. Shreeharsh Narwade – Pune
11. Vivek Dilip Mane – Pune
12. Esha Joshi – Mumbai
13. Kedar Pandit – Mumbai
14. ArshyDeori – Guwahati
15. Marshy Deori – Guwahati
16. Md Piyal Shaikh – Mumbai
17. Pranay Panpatil – Mumbai
18. Gaurav Vishwakarma – Pune
19. Akhil – Hyderabad
20. Staya – Hyderabad
21. Nupur Munda – Hyderabad
22. Nakshatra – Hyderabad
23. Ruchira Corolin – Hyderabad
24. Sonali – Hyderabad
25. Neeraj Kumar – Hyderabad
26. Sravani – Hyderabad
27. Akhil C.H. – Hyderabad
28. Nayana Sai Sree – Hyderabad
29. Leeladhar – Hyderabad

The finalists were selected based on their craftsmanship, originality, performance, and dedication to character authenticity.

About WAVES

The first World Audio Visual & Entertainment Summit, a milestone event for the media & entertainment sector, will be hosted by the Government of India in Mumbai, Maharashtra, from May 1 to 4, 2025.

Whether you’re an industry professional, investor, creator, or innovator, the Summit offers the ultimate global platform to connect, collaborate, innovate and contribute to the M&E landscape.

WAVES is set to magnify India’s creative strength, amplifying its position as a hub for content creation, intellectual property, and technological innovation. Industries and sectors in focus include Broadcasting, Print Media, Television, Radio, Films, Animation, Visual Effects, Gaming, Comics, Sound and Music, Advertising, Digital Media, Social Media Platforms, Generative AI, Augmented Reality (AR), Virtual Reality (VR), and Extended Reality (XR).

Have questions? Find answers here

Stay updated with the latest announcements from PIB Team WAVES

Come, Sail with us! Register for WAVES now

* * *

PIB TEAM WAVES 2025 | Riyas Babu/ Darshana | 94

Follow us on social media: @PIBMumbai    /PIBMumbai     /pibmumbai   pibmumbai[at]gmail[dot]com  /PIBMumbai     /pibmumbai

(Release ID: 2122055) Visitor Counter : 35

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region