LCQ13: Development and training in legal services sector
Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region
LCQ13: Development and training in legal services sector Question:
There are views that the legal services sector is one of the key pillars of Hong Kong’s economic development, playing a vital role in gross domestic product (GDP), overall employment and the export of professional services. Gaining a comprehensive understanding of the development trends and talent development in Hong Kong’s legal sector will help further strengthen the city’s international competitiveness. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
(1) whether it has assessed the legal services sector’s overall contribution to GDP over the past five years (including the total value of its services and its share of GDP), with the total value of services and the share of GDP set out by litigation services, non-litigation legal services, arbitration, mediation and other professional legal services;
(2) in respect of professional training, whether the Government will introduce specific measures to enhance the legal services sector’s knowledge of the six major emerging pillar industries (i.e. integrated circuits, aerospace, biomedicine, the low-altitude economy, new energy storage and intelligent robot) and the six future frontier industries (i.e. quantum technology, biomanufacturing, green hydrogen and fusion energy, brain-computer interfaces, 6G communications and embodied intelligence), so as to facilitate the sector’s provision of legal services to such industries in the future;
(3) whether it has compiled statistics on (i) the total number of persons employed in Hong Kong’s legal services sector, broken down into practising lawyers, legal assistants and legal executives; (ii) the number of corporate legal advisors in Hong Kong, set out by industry (such as finance, technologies and multinational enterprises); (iii) the number of arbitrators and mediators in Hong Kong, as well as their respective caseloads and the number of international cases in which they have been involved in each of the past five years; and
(4) given the constantly evolving models of legal service provision and the gradual replacement of certain manual processes by legal technology, whether the Government has compiled statistics on the number of personnel in the legal sector who have left the sector to pursue careers in other industries over the past five years; if it has, which industries have they mainly moved into?
Reply:
President,
Our consolidated reply to the various parts of the Hon Nick Chan’s question is as follows:
According to data from the Census and Statistics Department, the following shows the value added contributed by the “Legal, accounting and auditing services” and their share in the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in the past five years on record (i.e. 2020 to 2024):
In addition, professional and effective legal services, coupled with a well-established and robust legal system, facilitate the reduction of trade barriers, lowering of transaction costs and provision of a stable and predictable environment for doing business. These factors in turn indirectly increase the overall substantive contribution to the GDP by different industries.
The following shows the public data on the legal profession (solicitor and barrister) collated by the two legal professional bodies and reflects the point of time at which the Department of Justice (DoJ) accessed them.
According to the website of The Law Society of Hong Kong (Law Society), the breakdown of the number of members of the Law Society with practising certificates is as follows:
According to the website of the Hong Kong Bar Association (Bar Association), the number of the Bar Association members with practising certificates over the past five years were 1 758 (December 2025), 1 716 (January 2025), 1 672 (November 2023), 1 612 (December 2022) and 1 595 (December 2020) respectively.
The Law Society’s and the Bar Association’s websites do not provide the breakdown of the number of legal assistants, legal executives and corporate legal advisors.
Regarding the data on attrition within the legal profession, the DoJ does not have the relevant information. In fact, according to the Law Society’s and the Bar Association’s data, the number of members of the Law Society and the Bar Association with practising certificates respectively has been steadily increasing over the past five years.
Regarding legal education and professional training, the DoJ has been actively engaged in the development of legal education and training in Hong Kong through the Standing Committee on Legal Education and Training (SCLET), and has maintained good communication with the legal sector and the three law schools to keep abreast of the latest supply and demand of legal talent. The DoJ would continue to support the local law schools, the Law Society, the Bar Association and the SCLET in continuously reviewing and improving local legal education and professional training, thereby cultivating more outstanding and highly adaptable legal talent for Hong Kong.