Source: Hong Kong Information Services
Chief Executive John Lee said the defendants’ conspiracy was abundantly clear and they must be brought to justice after the Court of First Instance of the High Court delivered the verdict in the incitement to subversion case of “Hong Kong Alliance”.
The court today delivered the verdict in the case concerning the Alliance, Lee Cheuk-yan, Ho Chun-yan and Chow Hang-tung, who were charged with “incitement to subversion”.
The Alliance, Lee Cheuk-yan and Chow Hang-tung were convicted as charged after trial, while Ho Chun-yan pleaded guilty earlier and was convicted. The court adjourned the case to next Friday for mitigation.
Mr Lee noted that the Alliance had long been deliberately planting seeds of hatred against the Communist Party of China (CPC) and the central government in Hong Kong society, attempting to incite disaffection, hatred and other sentiments among members of the public against the CPC and the central government through various means, and inciting people to subvert state power.
“The acts of the defendants over a long period of time endangered national security; their conspiracy was abundantly clear, which must be brought to justice,” Mr Lee said.
He emphasised that incitement to subversion is an extremely serious offence. The Hong Kong SAR Government has the responsibility to safeguard national security, and will resolutely prevent, suppress and punish acts and activities endangering national security.
“This case once again demonstrates that no matter how offenders disguise their real agendas with sophistry and rhetoric, as long as they commit an offence endangering national security, the Hong Kong SAR Government will ensure that laws are observed and strictly enforced to bring the offenders to account.”
Welcoming the court’s verdict of conviction, the Hong Kong SAR Government highlighted that during the trial of this case, external forces blatantly and repeatedly smeared the Judiciary, the Department of Justice and law enforcement agencies, using political tactics and misleading remarks in an attempt to interfere with the fair trial of the case, and making baseless attacks against the Hong Kong SAR’s efforts in protecting human rights and freedoms as well as safeguarding national security.
The Hong Kong SAR Government strongly condemned their despicable attempt to openly trample on the rule of law. It reaffirmed that the law never allows anyone to openly harm one’s own country and compatriots under the pretext of human rights, democracy and freedom.
It added that the court reached its verdict strictly in accordance with the law and evidence, free from any interference, and absolutely without any political considerations. Any suggestion that certain individuals or organisations should be immune from legal consequences for their illegal acts is no different from advocating a special privilege to break the law, and this totally runs contrary to the spirit of the rule of law.
The court emphasised that the defendants were put on trial not because of their political views or beliefs, adding that it only considered the law and evidence relevant to the case to decide whether the prosecution was able to prove the charge beyond reasonable doubt.
It pointed out that when ordinary reasonable persons received the messages of the Alliance and other defendants, they must have understood that the aim of their agendas was to end the leadership of the CPC, and that other people were being encouraged to put the agendas into action.
In addition, the court pointed out that the defendants had all along been hostile towards the CPC and the central government under its leadership, and adhered to the course of resisting the central government and refusing to make any compromise.
After the implementation of the Hong Kong National Security Law, the defendants refused to pull back from the brink and were bent on embracing the resistance line of the Alliance to the very end. Even though the defendants knew that what they had said and done might have already gone beyond the scope of lawful freedom of expression, they paid no regard to it. The defendants intended to cause others to lose confidence in the CPC by stirring up hostility and causing division, so as to achieve the objective of undermining the fundamental system of the People’s Republic of China (PRC).
The Hong Kong SAR Government added that the Hong Kong SAR is an inalienable part of the PRC. The state provides the fundamental guarantee for the prosperity and development of Hong Kong, and the highest principle of “one country, two systems” is to safeguard national sovereignty, security and development interests.
The Hong Kong SAR Government will resolutely safeguard the fundamental system of the state established by the Constitution and the security of state power, and will, in strict accordance with the principle of the rule of law, prevent, suppress and punish acts and activities endangering national security with full force and in accordance with the law.