LCQ4: Making good use of countryside resources

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region – 4

Following is a question by the Hon Kenneth Fok and a written reply by the Secretary for Environment and Ecology, Mr Tse Chin-wan, in the Legislative Council today (April 29):

Question:

Our country’s Outline of the 15th Five-Year Plan proposes to accelerate the building of a leading sports nation, including promoting the safe and orderly opening up of natural resources such as water, air and mountain areas for outdoor sports. There are views that as the total area of Hong Kong’s country parks and special areas accounts for around 40 per cent of its land area, and they possess abundant resources for developing outdoor sports activities, the authorities may make good use of this advantage to promote “Sports for All”, drive the development of outdoor events and cultivate the habit of engaging in outdoor sports among people, so as to dovetail with our country’s planning. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:

(1) as the holding of activities in country parks and marine parks requires the application for a permit under the Country Parks and Special Areas Regulations (Cap. ‍208A), but some organisers have relayed certain difficulties such as the involvement of multiple departments in the vetting and approval process and cumbersome procedures when applying to hold an activity, whether the Government will review the existing application mechanism, formulate clear guidelines and provide one-‍stop coordination arrangements, with a view to facilitating the holding of large-scale outdoor activities and events; if so, of the directions and timetable of the review; if not, the reasons for that;

(2) whether the authorities will consider adjusting the conditions for applying for such permits, so as to strengthen the responsibilities of activity organisers in protecting the ecology of venues and managing crowd safety, and establish a more stringent monitoring and penalty mechanism to enhance regulation;

(3) as the work of the Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department (AFCD) for the current year includes the implementation of the “Four Peaks” tourism project, the enhancement of the educational, recreational and sustainable eco-‍tourism functions of country parks, and the promotion of a safe and environmentally-friendly approach to their use, but there are views that the popularity of hiking in recent years has led to frequent accidents and damage to walking trails, whether the Government will cooperate with professional sports organisations in stepping up the education on safe hiking and updating the Hiking Safety Guidelines, so as to strike a balance between the development of eco-tourism and risk prevention;

(4) as the AFCD’s statistics indicate that the country parks in Hong Kong receive over 10 ‍million visitors a year, and there are views that this amount has already far exceeded the carrying capacity of country parks and resulted in serious wear and tear of popular mountain trails and facilities, whether the authorities have any plans to allocate additional resources to strengthen the management of country parks and the repair and maintenance of walking trails, so as to maintain the appeal and sustainability of mountain trails as race courses and eco-‍tourism routes; whether they will formulate an integrated management strategy in the long term that incorporates technology-‍based monitoring such as drone patrols, with a view to enhancing management efficiency; if so, of the resources required and the plan concerned; if not, the reasons for that; and

(5) of the number of prosecutions over the past five years for violating the Country Parks and Special Areas Regulations and the irregularities involved (such as illegal camping activities and unlawful hawking), with a tabulated breakdown of the relevant figures and categories?

Reply:

President,

Hong Kong has rich ecological resources, with country parks and marine parks scattered across the territory, which offer beautiful scenery and are conveniently located near the bustling urban areas. The Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department (AFCD) seeks to protect the ecology and conduct site management properly, with arrangements made to complement actively to the Government’s policies and plans to promote sports in the community. In consultation with the Culture, Sports and Tourism Bureau, our reply to the questions raised by the Hon Kenneth Fok is as follows:

(1) According to the Country Parks and Special Areas Regulations (Cap. 208A) and Marine Parks and Marine Reserves Regulation (Cap. 476A), a permit granted by the Director of Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation is required for holding large-scale events, such as sporting competitions, public meetings, funding raising events, etc, in country parks or marine parks. In vetting the applications, the AFCD will mainly consider the impacts of the event on the environment and users of country parks or marine parks, as well as risks to public safety.

All applications involving country parks can be made nine months in advance of the activity at the earliest, or must reach the AFCD at least 10 working days before the activity day. The AFCD pledges to complete the assessment within three working days upon receipt of all essential information of the application. For similar events involving marine parks, applications can be made at least eight working days before the event day. To facilitate applicants, the AFCD has formulated guidelines that clearly explain the application procedures and requirements. Based on past experience, some applications of competition in country parks involve road sections that are under the purview of other government departments. Upon receipt of such applications, the AFCD will provide immediate advice and support, assisting the applicants in contacting the relevant departments as soon as possible to ensure a smooth process. The AFCD will continue to review the process from time to time to ensure all applications are handled effectively.

(2) To ensure that events would not impact on the natural ecology and public safety, organisers are required to provide detailed information of the events when submitting applications to hold activities in country parks for the AFCD to process, including route maps, layout plans of the venue, staff arrangement, crowd control, contingency plan for inclement weather, first-aid service, etc. The AFCD would consider the past records of the organisers, as well as the safety and pedestrian flow of the proposed routes, and impose appropriate requirements to ensure smooth running of the events.

The AFCD would maintain close communication with the organisers during the preparation and implementation of the events, and deploy staff to monitor the activities onsite during the events. If any non-compliance with the permit conditions is observed during the events, the AFCD would issue warning letters to the organisers. If there is any contravention of the law, the AFCD will take resolute enforcement actions. In order to establish a more stringent monitoring and penalty system, the AFCD had updated the guidelines in December 2025. If the organisers commit any non-compliant acts during the events, the bad track record will be recorded and taken into account by the AFCD when handling their future applications for holding events. If the organisers commit serious non-compliant acts, such as violations of the permit conditions, the AFCD may having regard to the circumstances impose a “suspension period” on the organisers for a certain period of time.

(3) The AFCD adopts a multi-prong approach to enhance safe hiking experiences, including placing information boards and direction signs at appropriate locations within the country parks, installing railings and warning signs at high-risk locations to prevent hikers from wandering into these locations and resulting in accidents. The department deploys additional staff to patrol, and utilises technology such as unmanned aerial vehicles in reminding hikers to pay attention to safety. On publicity and education fronts, the AFCD provides comprehensive information on various hiking trails on its “Enjoy Hiking” website (www.hiking.gov.hk), which also lists out high-risk locations with records of fatal and serious accidents, thereby enabling visitors to plan their trips properly. The AFCD has formulated country park hiking safety guidelines to remind visitors to pay attention to the weather, hike with company as far as possible, etc, and disseminates information on hiking safety through the AFCD’s website, “Enjoy Hiking” website, the thematic webpage “Hong Kong Great Outdoors” of the Hong Kong Tourism Board (www.discoverhongkong.com/eng/outdoors.html), and the social media platforms locally, and those in the Mainland and overseas as well.

The AFCD will continue to listen to the views of different stakeholders, including sports associations and professional bodies, and consult the statutory body of the Country and Marine Parks Boards, which is boardly represented by different sectors, to review practically the country park management strategies, and update safety guidelines as needed.

(4) The level of wear and tear of hiking trail facilities is dependent on multiple factors, including visitor numbers, hiking etiquette and nearby environment conditions. Certain popular trails and attractions may experience vegetation and soil erosion due to large visitation, aggravating deterioration of the facilities. In the light of the increasingly keen public interest of visiting country parks, the AFCD is enhancing the coverage and connectivity of the trail network, as well as implementing enhancement projects in various country parks, to divert visitors with diverse needs, thereby alleviating pressure on the hotspots. The AFCD will continue to closely monitor and analyse the visitor flow, and assess the usage conditions of country park trail facilities, and undertake appropriate enhancement works subject to resource availability, including rehabilitating eroded trails, controlling soil erosion on pathways, improving vegetation, enhancing cleansing services, upgrading visitor information, and strengthening public education to foster awareness regarding the protection of country park environments. Where deemed necessary, the AFCD may restrict the frequency of organising events at certain popular sites in the country parks.

In addition, the AFCD is actively applying technology to enhance management of country parks. To facilitate more effective monitoring of visitor flow in country parks, the AFCD has launched a pilot scheme since 2022 involving the installation of automatic people counters at main entrances of Aberdeen Country Park and Tai Lam Country Park, utilising infrared sensor technology to continuously record visitor flow. The scheme will be progressively extended to other country parks. Furthermore, the AFCD is currently assessing the feasibility of utilising unmanned aerial vehicles for monitoring trail conditions.

(5) The number of prosecutions instituted by the AFCD for various offences in country parks and special areas across the territory over the past five years is tabulated below:
 

Nature of offence Number of prosecutions
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Unauthorised possession or driving of vehicles or bicycles 426 342 236 416 227
Illegal camping 151 364 199 214 116
Entering closed sites (Note 1) 371 297 21 0 0
Illegal lighting of fires 94 74 22 20 17
Damaging plants 40 38 29 15 20
Littering 42 14 8 7 42
Others (Note 2) 16 15 16 20 33
Total 1140 1144 531 692 455

Note 1: All designated camping sites and barbecue sites in country parks were closed during the COVID-19 pandemic and reopened on November 17, 2022. Some of the prosecutions were instituted in 2023.

Note 2: Other offences included illegal selling of objects, displaying advertisement, damaging country park facility, disturbing soil, spitting, holding of sporting competition and other commercial activities without approval, entering specified zone (i.e. the Hong Kong Wetland Park) without paying admission fee and obstructing authorised officer in discharge of duty.

LCQ16: Promoting use of electric vehicles in government vehicle fleet

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

LCQ16: Promoting use of electric vehicles in government vehicle fleet 
Question:
 
     The Government launched earlier the Updated Version of the Hong Kong Roadmap on Popularisation of Electric Vehicles (the Updated Roadmap) to accelerate the popularisation of electric vehicles (EVs) and green transformation. While the Updated Roadmap states that the Government will continue to promote the use of EVs in its vehicle fleet, there are views suggesting that the current proportion of EVs in the government vehicle fleet is relatively low, and that the specific progress and roadmap for this initiative are unclear. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
 
(1) whether the current arrangement of setting EV as the standard for small and medium government private cars to be procured or replaced will be extended to the entire government vehicle fleet; whether there is a phased plan to replace all government vehicles with EVs; if so, of the details;
 
(2) of the current number of senior government officials who have switched their saloon cars to EVs; whether it will require that all saloon cars of Directors of Bureaux and Heads of Government Departments be prioritised for replacement with EVs in order to further expand the scope of the replacement; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that; and
 
(3) whether it has plans to allocate dedicated resources in future fiscal years, such as increasing the budget for vehicle purchases or charging infrastructure, to accelerate the pace of the transition to EVs; whether there will be a monitoring mechanism, and whether the relevant data and reports will be made public, such as the annual publication of the proportion of EVs in the government vehicle fleet, reductions in carbon emissions, and effectiveness assessments?
 
Reply:
 
President,
 
     Having consulted the Environment and Ecology Bureau and the Government Logistics Department (GLD), our reply to the question raised by the Hon Chan Cho-kwong is as follows:
 
(1) The Government announced in February this year the Updated Version of the Hong Kong Roadmap on Popularisation of Electric Vehicles, reaffirming the ongoing adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) in the government fleet. All new or replacement private cars procured by the Government must be EVs, except where operational requirements preclude the use of EVs. As electric vans are at a stage of large-scale application, the Government will explore the feasibility of making electric vans a mandatory requirement in future procurement. The Government will also regularly review whether other electric commercial vehicles can be included in the mandatory procurement scope.
 
     In taking the lead in adopting EVs, the Government must ensure that resources are put to their best use and that public funds are used prudently. Therefore, the Government will not phase out existing vehicles prematurely before their normal replacement cycle. GLD will, in accordance with the Government’s Circular Memorandum “Green Procurement in the Government”, prioritise the procurement of EVs where practicable having regard to operational needs of bureaux and departments (B/Ds) and actual market conditions, including the development and supply of EVs. With the increasing market availability of EV makes and models in recent years, the number and proportion of EVs in the government fleet have risen gradually. Among the 219 private cars GLD ordered for B/Ds in 2025, about 98 per cent (i.e. 214 cars) were EVs.

(2) Senior officials have been progressively switching to EVs in accordance with the Government’s Circular Memorandum “Green Procurement in the Government” when replacing their official cars. To achieve optimal use of resources and adhere to environmental principles to avoid wastage, the Government will not phase out existing vehicles ahead of schedule. Currently, 15 of the vehicles used by the 21 Secretaries of Departments, Deputy Secretaries of Departments and Directors of Bureaux are EVs, accounting for about 71 per cent of the vehicles.  
     To encourage B/Ds to adopt EVs and meet their charging needs, currently GLD procures a medium charger for each new electric private car acquired. Moreover, to meet B/Ds’ actual operational needs (e.g. long hours of outdoor operations), it could be difficult to schedule sufficient charging time for EVs at government car parks. Hence, the Government has also installed quick/fast chargers to support the operational needs.
 
     As for data disclosure, GLD publishes annually the establishment information of government vehicles by fuel type (including the number of EVs) via the Open Data Portal (data.gov.hkIssued at HKT 11:22

NNNN

Reports of the Director of Audit

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

Reports of the Director of AuditApril 7, 2026 (i.e. the deadline for submission of Report No. 86 of the Director of Audit). In accordance with the value for money audit guidelines tabled in the Provisional LegCo on February 11, 1998, approval of the Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region has been obtained for the deferral.2            Labour Department: Employment support services for young people
3            Management of food waste treatment facilities by the Environmental Protection Department
4            Management of public swimming pool complexes 
5            Property Management Services Authority
6            Upgrading the fire safety in industrial buildings
7            Work of the Companies Registry
8            Work of the Development Bureau in tree management
 
     Report No. 86 of the Director of Audit comprises the following eight chapters:  1            Health and Medical Research Fund
2            Maintenance of highway structures by the Highways Department
3            Management of food waste by the Environmental Protection Department
4            Operation of the Hong Kong Observatory
5            Regulation and monitoring of ferry services by the Transport Department
6            Social Innovation and Entrepreneurship Development Fund
7            Subsidy Scheme to Extend Fibre-based Networks to Villages in Remote Areas
8            Youth hostels constructed with Government fundingIssued at HKT 11:06

NNNN

LCQ13: Enduring powers of attorney

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

     ​Following is a question by the Hon Ginny Man and a written reply by the Secretary for Labour and Welfare, Mr Chris Sun, in the Legislative Council today (April 29):

Question: 
(1) given that submission of proof of practice is not a legal requirement for registration, whether the Government knows the commencement date and rationale for implementing the relevant requirement, and of the types of other acceptable documentary proof of practice;
 
(2) whether it has measures in place to assist members of the public in finding medical practitioners who are willing to witness the execution of EPAs and matching such medical practitioners with them; if so, of the details; and
 
(3) given that for EPAs signed in the earlier years that have not been registered, the donors may not have kept the proof of practice of the witnessing solicitors and the medical practitioners at the time, whether the Government knows if the Judiciary has measures in place to assist in the registration of such EPAs; if so, of the details; if not, of any flexible proposal to deal with such EPAs?(b) The original and a certified copy of the EPA.

Hospital Authority Family Medicine Outpatient Services arrangements on Labour Day holiday

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

Region  1/F, 8 Chai Wan Road, Shau Kei Wan 2560 0211 3157 0077 Wan Chai Violet Peel Family Medicine Clinic LG, Tang Shiu Kin Hospital Community Ambulatory Care Centre, 282 Queen’s Road East, Wan Chai 3553 3116 3157 0000 Kowloon Kwun Tong Family Medicine Integrated Centre UG/F, 60 Hip Wo Street, Kwun Tong 2389 0331 3157 0687 Nam Cheong Family Medicine Clinic G/F, Treasury Building, 3 Tonkin Street West, Cheung Sha Wan 3742 3876 3543 5795 Our Lady of Maryknoll Hospital Family Medicine Clinic G/F, Out-patient Block, Our Lady of Maryknoll Hospital, 118 Shatin Pass Road, Wong Tai Sin 2354 2267 3157 0118 San Po Kong Robert Black Family Medicine Clinic 600 Prince Edward Road East, San Po Kong 2383 3311 3157 0113 Yau Ma Tei Jockey Club Family Medicine Clinic 1/F, 145 Battery Street, Yau Ma Tei 2272 2400 3157 0880 New Territories Lek Yuen Family Medicine Clinic G/F, 9 Lek Yuen Street, Sha Tin 2692 8730 3157 0972 North District Family Medicine Integrated Centre 3/F, North District Community Health Centre Building, 3 Wai Wo Street, Sheung Shui 2957 5186 3157 0965 Tai Po Jockey Club Family Medicine Clinic G/F, 37 Ting Kok Road, Tai Po 2664 2039 3157 0906 Tseung Kwan O (Po Ning Road) Family Medicine Clinic G/F, 28 Po Ning Road, Tseung Kwan O 2191 1083 3157 0660 Tsuen Wan Lady Trench Family Medicine Clinic 213 Sha Tsui Road, Tsuen Wan 2614 4789 3157 0107 Tuen Mun Family Medicine Clinic 11 Tsing Yin Street, San Hui, Tuen Mun 2452 9111 3543 0886 Yuen Long Jockey Club Family Medicine Clinic 269 Castle Peak Road, Yuen Long 2443 8511 3543 5007

Applications for flag days in 2027-28 to close on May 14

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region – 4

The Social Welfare Department (SWD) today (April 29) reminds charitable organisations wishing to hold flag days from April 2027 to March 2028 that the deadline for related applications is 6pm on May 14. 

The application form for flag days together with the explanatory notes can be downloaded from the SWD’s website at www.swd.gov.hk/en/ngo/controlofc/flagdays/index.html. The completed application form together with the required documents should reach the Lotteries Fund Projects Section of the SWD at Rooms 3601-02, 36/F, Dah Sing Financial Centre, 248 Queen’s Road East, Wan Chai, Hong Kong, by 6pm on May 14. Applications for flag days in 2027-28 can also be submitted online. Please refer to the SWD’s website for application details. Late applications will not be considered.

Enquiries can be made by telephone to 2832 4318 or 2832 4301; by fax to 2838 0441; or by email to flagday@swd.gov.hk

Commissioner of Police leads delegation to visit Singapore

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

Commissioner of Police leads delegation to visit Singapore       
     The delegation attended the MTX 2026 on April 28 and engaged with the international public safety community to better understand innovative and emerging technologies to enhance public safety. The summit, held biennially, is the largest public safety conference in Southeast Asia serving as a global platform to foster collaboration and advance public safety capabilities through science and technology. The delegation attended keynote sessions and panel discussions on various topics, such as artificial intelligence and network security, and visited key exhibitions showcasing the latest innovations in public safety, demonstrating the HKPF’s ongoing efforts in advancing technology applications and international co-operation.
      
     On the sidelines of the summit, the delegation met with the Commissioner of the Singapore Police Force, Mr How Kwang Hwee, and the Inspector-General of the Royal Malaysia Police, Mr Dato’ Sri Haji Mohd Khalid Ismail, to exchange views on issues of mutual concern. The delegation also engaged with international experts and technology professionals across the public safety ecosystem.
      
     On the same day, Mr Chow also met the Chief Executive of HTX, Mr Chan Tsan. Following the meeting, both sides signed an MOU to strengthen co-operation in leveraging innovative technologies to advance public safety. The MOU provides a broad framework for co-operation in areas of mutual interest, including capability development, knowledge exchange, anti-scam measures, training systems, and exploration of emerging technologies to support policing operations.
      
     Separately, on April 27, the delegation visited the INTERPOL Global Complex for Innovation, and toured its Digital Forensics Laboratory to gain insights into the application of artificial intelligence in combating transnational cybercrime.
      
     Mr Chow concluded his visit today (April 29) and returned to Hong Kong.
Issued at HKT 15:00

NNNN

LCQ11: Enhancing property mortgage terms calculation method

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

LCQ11: Enhancing property mortgage terms calculation method 
Question:
 
     Currently, banks generally adopt 75 years minus the age of the property or the borrower (i.e. “75-n”), taking the shorter period as the basis, to calculate a property mortgage term of not more than 30 years. There are views that various measures introduced by the Government in recent years, including the Mandatory Building and Window Inspection Scheme and the Lift Modernisation Subsidy Scheme, have helped to improve the maintenance of many aged buildings. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
 
(1) whether it has maintained the number of transactions of properties aged over 50 years in the past three years;
 
(2) whether it has maintained the total number of units in private buildings currently aged over 50 years; and
 
(3) whether the authorities will study promoting to the banking industry to enhance the calculation method of property mortgage terms by uniformly changing the formula from “75-n” to “80-n”?
 
Reply:
 
President,
 
     Proper maintenance of private buildings is owners’ primary responsibility. In addition to identifying high-risk private buildings through the Mandatory Building Inspection Scheme (MBIS) for issuing MBIS notices requiring owners to inspect and repair the buildings, the Government also partners with the Urban Renewal Authority to launch a number of building rehabilitation subsidy schemes to support owners in need with proper building maintenance. These schemes include the Operation Building Bright 2.0 and Lift Modernisation Subsidy Scheme (LIMSS), etc. In the 2026-27 Budget, the Government announced that $3 billion would be earmarked for drawing up a new subsidy scheme to assist owners in need with building inspections and repairs, and $1 billion would be allocated to extend the LIMSS.
 
     After consulting the Development Bureau and the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA), our reply to the three parts of the question is as follows:
 
(1) & (2) According to the Buildings Department (BD)’s record, as at the end of 2025, there were approximately 11 000 private buildings aged 50 years or above. However, the BD does not maintain records of the number of units involved.
 
     As regards the number of property transactions, the Land Registry (LR)’s function is to register and maintain records of the instruments submitted to the LR, including property sale and purchase agreements, assignments, and mortgages/legal charges. Therefore, the LR does not maintain statistics on transactions of properties by building age.
 
(3) The approval of loans is a commercial decision made by banks. When processing mortgage applications, banks take into account a host of factors, including the borrower’s repayment capacity and the condition of the building. The age of the property and the borrower are just among various factors of consideration. When considering whether to approve mortgage applications for a residential property, the information regarding the completion of inspection and repair of the building may assist banks in evaluating the condition of the building. The HKMA does not set a specific mortgage term limit based on the age of a property or a borrower.
Issued at HKT 14:35

NNNN

LCQ2: Subsidy Scheme for Abolition of MPF Offsetting Arrangement

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

LCQ2: Subsidy Scheme for Abolition of MPF Offsetting Arrangement 
     The Government launched the Subsidy Scheme for Abolition of MPF Offsetting Arrangement (SSA) on May 1 last year. Employers, after settling severance payment (SP) and long service payment (LSP) to their employees in accordance with the Employment Ordinance (Cap. 57), may apply for subsidies under the SSA. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
 
(1) of the number of applications received by the authorities and the average processing time for each case since the launch of the SSA; among such cases, the respective numbers and percentages of applications (i) approved, (ii) refused and (iii) withdrawn (set out in Table 1); whether it has complied statistics on the main reasons for refusal and withdrawal of the applications;
 
Table 1

Application results(2) of (i) the number of applications received by the authorities, and (ii) the number of applications approved and their percentages since the launch of the SSA, and set out in Table 2 a breakdown by the type of trade of employers involved;
 
Table 2

Type of trade of employers involved(3) of the total amount of subsidies for all approved cases and the average amount of subsidies for each case since the launch of the SSA;
 
(4) among the cases in which approval has been completed, of the respective numbers of applications in which an applicant has lodged a review as he/she is not satisfied with the amount of subsidies approved or has lodged an appeal as he/she is not satisfied with the refusal of his/her application since the launch of the SSA, and the percentages of successful appeals or reviews among them; whether it has compiled statistics on the main reasons for refusal of the review or appeal applications;
 
(5) as according to the paper submitted by the Government to the Finance Committee of this Council on November 22, 2024, the Labour Department (LD) will engage a processing agent to assist in the administration of the SSA, of the following information on the processing agent’s implementation of the SSA since February 1 last year: (i) the preparatory fee collected, (ii) the staffing establishment and strength involved, (iii) the average fee for processing each subsidy application, (iv) the number of spot checks performed on cases processed, (v) the number of enquiries received and processed, and (vi) the number of public engagement activities organised and the number of participants;
 
(6) as some employees may receive less aggregate benefits due to the change in calculation of the SP/LSP entitlement after the abolition of the offsetting arrangement, and these “worse-off” employees can apply to the LD for a subsidy to make up for the shortfall in their aggregate benefits, of the number of applications for the subsidy received by the authorities and the amount of subsidy involved since May 1 last year; and
 
(7) whether the LD has received any complaints about suspected premature dismissal of employees by employers before the abolition of the offsetting arrangement took effect in order to save SP or LSP expenses since 2025; if so, of the number of complaints received by the LD, the industries in which the complainants are engaged, and the follow-up on the complaints?

Reply:
 
President,
 
     The Government implemented the abolition of the Mandatory Provident Fund (MPF) offsetting arrangement on May 1, 2025 (the transition date). Since then, employers can no longer use the accrued benefits derived from their mandatory MPF contributions to offset an employee’s severance payment (SP)/long service payment (LSP) payable under the Employment Ordinance in respect of the employment period starting from the transition date (the post-transition portion of SP/LSP). 
     The reply to the Member’s question is set out below:
 
(1) As at March 2026, the SSA received a total of 20 790 applications from employers, of which 16 793 applications had been processed. The application results are tabulated below:
 

Results of application 
     In general, employers will be notified of the application results within 30 working days upon submission of an application and all necessary information and documents.

     Refusal of applications is primarily due to factors such as that the employers were not affected by the abolition of MPF offsetting arrangement (for example, the employees involved were exempted persons under the Mandatory Provident Fund Schemes Ordinance, or had reached the age of 65 before the transition date and thus the employers were not required to make MPF contributions for the employees in respect of the employment periods from the transition date onwards); or the employees involved did not meet the eligibility criteria for SP/LSP as specified by the Employment Ordinance at the time of termination of employment contracts. The SSA does not inquire about the reasons for withdrawal of applications from the employers concerned.
 
(2) As at March 2026, a breakdown of applications received and approved under the SSA by industry of the employers involved is at Annex.
 
(3) As at March 2026, the SSA disbursed a total amount of $42.24 million of subsidy to employers, with an average of $2,700 for each approved application.
 
(4) Applicants may request reviews of their applications with justifications if they disagree with the results, and may lodge appeals if they disagree with the review results.
 
     As at March 2026, the SSA received 294 review applications from employers, of which 130 were approved (44.2 per cent) after review. Besides, 16 appeal applications submitted by employers under the SSA were refused. The reason for refusing the review or appeal applications was that the applicants could not provide sufficient justifications for altering the original vetting decisions.
 
(5) The Labour Department (LD) appointed a processing agent (PA) to set up the Service Centre for the SSA and process subsidy applications. Breakdowns of figures for PA’s assistance in the implementation of the SSA are as follows:
 
(i) The preparatory fee received by PA was $8,800,000.
 
(ii) The Tender Documents require PA to provide no less than 76 staff members. To ensure quality of service, the actual number of staff members provided by PA as at April 15, 2026, was 93. Details are as follows:
 

Post(as at April 15, 2026)Examination team leader
Customer services team leaderApproving officer
Examiner
Customer services officer     In addition to the above, PA provided five operations management supporting staff.
 
(iii) As at April 15, 2026, the service fees received by PA for the implementation period of the SSA were $56,888,280. The service fees included the costs for operating the Service Centre and back office, provision of manpower, processing applications in accordance with the operation guidelines and instructions provided by the LD, handling enquiries and complaints, conducting quality assurance checks and internal audit checks on applications, assisting in organising publicity and public engagement activities, executing technical proposals as committed in the Tender Proposal, and carrying out all the tasks as required in the Service Contract. As the service fees reflected the aforementioned services as a whole, the average cost of processing each application cannot be determined.
 
(iv) As at March 2026, the Service Centre selected a total of 123 applications with processing completed for conducting audit checks.
 
(v) As at March 2026, the Service Centre received 27 798 enquiries and completed processing of 27 619.
 
(vi) To assist employers in understanding the SSA, the Government has conducted extensive publicity, including launching the TransitionEase website to disseminate details about applying for subsidies, and organising briefing sessions for employers, employees and human resources practitioners. From January 2025 to March 2026, the LD held a total of 63 briefing sessions, with over 18 800 participants. Besides, the Service Centre organised two briefing sessions in April 2026 to introduce SSA to employers, attracting around 140 participants.
 
(6) As at March 2026, the SSA received a total of 14 applications from employees applying for subsidy to make up for the shortfall in aggregate benefits. After vetting, two applications were approved with a total subsidy of about $12,000 disbursed and no shortfall in employees’ aggregate benefits after the abolition of the offsetting arrangement was found in respect of four applications. The remaining eight applications are being processed.
 
(7) The LD has been conducting publicity through various channels to remind employers that dismissing serving employees before the transition date and subsequently rehiring them will not save expenses on SP/LSP. The LD has not received any complaint involving employers allegedly dismissing employees before the abolition of the offsetting arrangement took effect for the purpose of reducing SP/LSP expenses.
Issued at HKT 12:45

NNNN

LCQ19: Regulating claw machine venues and pinball machine shops

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

LCQ19: Regulating claw machine venues and pinball machine shops      
     It has been reported that in recent years, claw machine venues and pinball machine shops have mushroomed in Hong Kong. Some pinball machine shops feature functions such as “odds” and “points” and offer expensive prizes to solicit business, attracting members of the public or even minors to spend entire days there, thus arousing public concern about issues such as “disguised gambling practices and addiction”. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
 
(1) of the following information on reports received by the authorities from members of the public regarding claw machines in each of the past five years: (i) the number of reports (including the number of cases suspected of involving (a) illegal gambling, (b) suspected counterfeit or pirated products, and (c) alleged unfair trade practices), (ii) the number of prosecutions, and (iii) the number of successful convictions (including (a) the number of arrests, (b) the number of venues and machines involved, and (c) the amount of fines);
 
(2) given that in its reply to a question raised by a Member of this Council on February 12 last year, the Government indicated that the High Court has ruled that typical claw machine venues where people clamp items in the machines upon payment are no longer required to obtain a Places of Public Entertainment Licence under the Places of Public Entertainment Ordinance (Cap. 172), whether the authorities have plans to strengthen the regulation and inspection of claw machine venues, including formulating a new licensing system and setting the frequency of regular inspections; if so, of the details and the timetable; if not, the reasons for that;
 
(3) given that in its reply to a question raised by a Member of this Council on the first of this month, the Government indicated that if the operation of a pinball machine shop involves the offering of prizes, an Amusements with Prizes Licence (AWPL) should be obtained, and one of the licensing conditions for AWPL is “no prize offered shall be a money prize”, but it is learnt that some pinball machine shops cash out prizes through methods such as “gift redemption” and “private buybacks” to evade regulation, whether the authorities have proactively conducted regular inspections of all pinball machine shops in Hong Kong, and of the measures taken to curb the above situation; if so, the details;
 
(4) whether the Hong Kong Police Force and the Home Affairs Department will strengthen co-operation to regularly make public the number of reports, frequency of inspections, and outcome of prosecutions with respect to illegal gambling and unlicensed operations, etc, in pinball machine shops, with a view to enhancing the transparency of relevant information;
 
(5) given that in its reply to a question raised by a Member of this Council on the first of this month, the Government indicated that it is reviewing matters relating to the regulation of AWPL, whether the scope of the review will cover items such as the business models, value and redemption of prizes, entry age, business locations, and information disclosure requirements with respect to pinball machine shops, and of the respective expected timetables for completing the review and announcing the results; and
 
(6) as there are views that the prizes and their values currently offered by some claw machine venues and pinball machine shops, as well as the operation modes of the machines, may involve gambling elements and are likely to lead to obsession or even addiction among minors, apart from regulation through enacting legislation, whether the authorities have plans to strengthen co-operation with schools, parents and district organisations to educate minors about the associated risks of addiction and obsession; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that? 
President,
 
     Having consulted the Hong Kong Police Force (HKPF), the Customs and Excise Department (C&ED) and the Home Affairs Department (HAD), I provide the following consolidated reply to the question raised by the Hon Chan Pui-leung:

Case category     ​The prosecution cases were associated with the offence of possession for sale or for any purpose of trade or manufacture of goods to which a forged trade mark was applied as stipulated under section 9(2) of the Trade Descriptions Ordinance. In the four prosecution cases, C&ED arrested a total of five persons and seized 49 claw machines from 11 shops. In the three convicted cases, the sentences imposed were community service orders or suspended sentence.

(2) to (5) According to the Gambling Ordinance (Cap. 148) (the Ordinance), operating a game of amusement with prizes requires an Amusements with Prizes Licence (AWPL). Furthermore, a Places of Public Entertainment Licence under the Places of Public Entertainment Ordinance (Cap. 172) is a prerequisite for any AWPL application. 
     The PWF provides tailored counselling, treatment and other support services to individuals affected by gambling as well as their family members. It also launches targeted public education and publicity campaigns to raise public awareness, particularly among young people, of the harms associated with gambling addiction, including emerging gambling modes, to mitigate their negative impact. These public education measures include funding non-governmental organisations and schools to organise public education programmes focused on the prevention and mitigation of gambling-related problems.
Issued at HKT 12:40

NNNN