LCQ19: Advancing development of poultry and livestock farming industry

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

LCQ19: Advancing development of poultry and livestock farming industry 
Question:
 
     The Recommendations for Formulating the 15th Five-Year Plan explicitly propose “enhancing the overall production capacity of agriculture”, that “fresh headway should be made in keeping our skies blue, waters clear, and lands clean”, as well as “pressing ahead with initiatives to invigorate the seed industry”; and the Ecological and Environmental Code, which was endorsed at the fourth session of the 14th National People’s Congress on the 12 of this month, sets out mandatory provisions concerning the prevention and control of pollution from livestock and poultry farming and slaughtering, the fostering of resource recycling, ecological protection as well as the strengthening of food security, etc. There are views that Hong Kong should dovetail with the strategic arrangements on national agricultural development to promote the standardised implementation and high-quality development of local poultry and livestock farming projects. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
 
(1) as the Government will formulate Hong Kong’s five-year plan to dovetail with the National 15th Five-Year Plan, whether the Government has plans to include policy initiatives that seek to advance the development of poultry and livestock farming projects so as to dovetail with the national arrangements on smart farming and biosecurity; how the Government will strengthen co-operation with local research institutions to encourage the promotion of technologies pertaining to precise feeding as well as the undertaking of research and development (R&D) relating to premium poultry and livestock farming techniques;
 
(2) regarding the quarantine and hygiene measures for the poultry and livestock farming industry, how the Government (i) establishes mechanisms on regular monitoring, investigation and emergency response; (ii) ensures the full implementation of inspection and quarantine measures throughout the farming process to effectively prevent the risk of transmission of major animal diseases (such as African swine fever), whilst taking into account the needs of poultry and livestock farming; and (iii) assist the industry in properly addressing issues relating to feed contamination and the waste generated from the farming process; and
 
(3) how the Government assists the industry in dovetailing with the national direction of enhancing self-reliance and control over poultry and livestock provenance, and formulates measures in support of provenance R&D, the introduction of superior breeds and their localised cultivation, so as to enhance the core competitiveness of the poultry and livestock industry?
 
Reply:
 
President,
 
     The reply to the question raised by the Hon Chan Pok-chi is as follows:
 
(1) To align with the National 15th Five-Year Plan, the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government is formulating the first Hong Kong’s Five-Year Plan in full steam to provide clear guidance for Hong Kong’s socio-economic and livelihood development. As far as the agriculture and fisheries industries are concerned, the Government proactively drives the local agriculture and fisheries industries towards high-quality development in accordance with the Blueprint for the Sustainable Development of Agriculture and Fisheries, so as to go in line with the strategic direction of “accelerating agricultural and rural modernisation” as stated in the National 15th Five-Year Plan, as well as the overall plan to “enhance the comprehensive production capacity of agriculture” and develop “intensified farming”.
 
     To assist the livestock farming industry in upgrading and transformation, the Government is proactively driving the industry to build Hong Kong’s first modernised environmentally-friendly multi-storey pig farm at a site in Lo Wu, with the site formation works expected to be completed within this year. The contractor and operator will also be selected in the second quarter of this year. The pig farm is expected to commence operation by 2032 and will adopt an intensified and modernised mode, coupled with smart technologies such as automated environmental control and precision feeding system and the Internet of Things, to raise farming efficiency and biosecurity standards, with a view to achieving sustainable development. The design and operational model will also strictly comply with the laws and regulations on animal welfare, environmental protection and public health, etc.
 
     Besides, through the Sustainable Agricultural Development Fund, the Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department (AFCD) subsidises the industry to develop and apply modernised livestock farming technologies, such as formulating the Architectural Design Guidelines for Multilayer Livestock Farms and projects that enhance the capability of pig farms in handling odour emission, etc. The AFCD will continue to encourage local universities and research institutions to collaborate with the sector in undertaking different kinds of research and development projects on high-quality livestock farming technology, with a view to enhancing the overall standards of smart farming and biosecurity of the local industry.
 
(2) In terms of disease surveillance, local livestock farms are regulated under the Public Health (Animals and Birds) (Licensing of Livestock Keeping) Regulation (Cap. 139L), and are required to implement disease surveillance (such as African Swine Fever (ASF) testing in pig carcasses) and biosecurity measures, etc, in accordance with the requirements of livestock keeping licences. The AFCD has been strictly monitoring animal health and public health conditions at local livestock farms and implementing a host of ongoing prevention and control measures, such as arranging regular testing (including ASF virus testing), to ensure early detection and management of potential risks of disease.
 
     The multi-storey pig farm will adopt a fully-enclosed design, which can substantially reduce the impact of pathogens and contaminants from wild animals and the external environment on pigs’ health, effectively prevent direct contact between pigs and the outside environment, and significantly lower the risk of disease transmission. In addition, the multi-storey pig farm will be equipped with ventilation and filtration systems to block airborne pathogens and pollutants, thereby further reducing infection risks while enhancing biosecurity levels. The farm will be equipped with real-time round-the-clock monitoring systems to track pigs’ health, allowing for early detection and follow-up of potential health issues of pigs, and at the same time more efficiently monitoring the proper execution of biosecurity protocols by the workers. The AFCD will conduct regular drills simulating the outbreaks of disease in collaboration with the operator of the multi-storey pig farm, so that the pig farm workers could be familiarised with the emergency response procedures to ensure rapid and appropriate responses in the event of disease outbreaks.
 
     On feed management, the multi-storey pig farm will employ precision feeding systems with the use of sealed feed silos and fully enclosed pipelines, which could not only stop birds and pests from contacting the feed, but also effectively prevent the feed from moisture, mould growth, or contamination by external pathogens in the course of storage and distribution. Feed procurement and storage conditions are also subject to strict control to minimise contamination risks caused by the feed to the overall environmental hygiene at source. For livestock waste treatment, it is explicitly specified in the livestock keeping licence that pig farms must be equipped with modernised wastewater treatment technology and enclosed deodorisation systems to ensure that livestock waste and odours are properly converted and treated and in strict compliance with the environmental discharge standards, thereby minimising the impact on the surrounding environment.
 
(3) The Government has all along been collaborating with the Mainland in various areas of agriculture and fisheries. In particular, the AFCD signed the Memorandum of Understanding on Facilitation of Technological Exchange and Co-operation on Sustainable Development of Agriculture with the Guangdong Province in 2024 to further deepen technological exchanges and co-operation between the two places on livestock farming. The AFCD has also led delegations consisting of local stakeholders (including Legislative Council members, representatives of livestock industry associations and local pig farmers) for field visits to large-scale pig farms in the Mainland on multiple occasions, so as to understand their operation mode, biosecurity and animal disease control measures and draw on the experience of the Mainland in designing and managing multi-storey pig farms.
 
     With reference to the successful experience in the Mainland, AI technology will be introduced into the multi-storey pig farm to provide scientific data support for performance testing and selection of superior breeds by precisely monitoring key parameters such as the health status and growth of each breeding pig, with the aim to contribute to our country’s research and development on livestock breeds. In addition, the AFCD is exploring with Mainland breeding pig breeder enterprises the feasibility of importing breeding pigs from national-accredited high-end breeding pig nurseries in the Mainland to local pig farms, so as to prepare for the introduction of superior breeds and localised cultivation in the multi-storey pig farm.
Issued at HKT 12:22

NNNN

LCQ21: Measures to support middle-class people

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

LCQ21: Measures to support middle-class people 
Question:
 
     There are views that despite the increasing burden on middle-class families in terms of children’s education, housing costs, healthcare expenditure, professional enhancement and retirement protection, the Government’s existing measures (such as introducing the child allowance, increasing the ceiling amount for concessionary deductions allowable for home loan interest and domestic rent, and providing further education subsidies and vocational training) have failed to adequately respond to the actual needs of the middle class. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
 
(1) given that, in reply to a Member’s question at the special meeting of the Finance Committee on January 16 this year, the Government advised that it would comprehensively examine whether to allow members of the public to withdraw part of their Mandatory Provident Fund (MPF) savings for a home purchase, of the specific contents and timetable of the study; and whether it will simultaneously explore the feasibility of utilising MPF for other purposes in support of the middle class;
 
(2) apart from the existing basic child allowance and additional child allowance in the year of birth, whether it will explore increasing the child allowance based on the number of children (such as raising the allowance by a certain percentage for each additional child) to ease the burden of child-rearing on middle-class families; if it will, of the details and the implementation timetable; if not, the reasons for that;
 
(3) apart from the existing dependent parent allowance and dependent grandparent allowance, whether it will consider introducing other tax deductions for taking care of the elderly, such as an “allowance for expenses on elderly home care” for hiring foreign domestic helpers or using local domiciliary nursing services;
 
(4) whether it will consider afresh setting a definition for “the middle class” to facilitate the establishment of a “middle class commission” dedicated to studying the predicament faced by middle-class people and formulating measures targeting middle-class people in such areas as education, housing, healthcare, career development and retirement protection, so as to ease their burden; and
 
(5) whether it will consider reintroducing the Sandwich Class Housing Scheme or a similar scheme to provide reasonably-priced housing options in convenient locations, thereby helping middle-class people achieve their goal of having a settled home within their means?
 
Reply:
 
President,
 
     Upon consultation with the Housing Department on the fifth item, our reply to the Hon Nick Chan’s question is as follows:
 
(1) The purpose of the Mandatory Provident Fund (MPF) System is to assist the Hong Kong working population in accumulating savings for their retirement. Allowing scheme members to withdraw part of their MPF benefits early for home purchases, education, medical care, etc, will cause an impact on their retirement protection. MPF is a long-term investment with compounding effect, designed to allow MPF benefits to accumulate steadily during the working life of scheme members. Therefore, MPF benefits should be preserved as far as possible and only be withdrawn upon retirement of the employed persons. If the Government were to relax the preservation requirement on MPF benefits and allow scheme members to make early withdrawals to meet their home ownership, education, medical needs, etc, scheme members will lose the opportunity for their MPF benefits to accumulate for value growth, thereby undermining their basic retirement protection. The Government currently has no plan to expand the use of MPF or revise the grounds of allowing early withdrawals of MPF benefits.
 
(2) and (3) When considering whether to adjust tax measures (including tax bands, tax rates, introduction of new tax allowances and deductions), the Government must carefully examine the effectiveness of such policy proposals and their impact on public finance, while taking into account social, economic, and other public policy considerations, striking a balance between pursuing policies and maintaining healthy public finance.
 
     To alleviate the burden of taxpayers raising children and encourage childbirth, the Government proposed in the 2025 Policy Address and the 2026-27 Budget to extend the claim period of the additional child allowance for newborns from one year to two years, and to increase the child allowance and additional child allowance from $130,000 to $140,000 with effect from the year of assessment 2026/27. It is estimated that the two measures will benefit 16 000 taxpayers and 360 000 taxpayers respectively, resulting in a total government revenue forgone of about $980 million annually. If child allowance is increased based on the number of children, for example, increasing the allowance to $280,000 for the second child and to $560,000 for the third to ninth children, it is estimated that Government revenue will further decrease by about $2.8 billion annually. The Government has already proposed an increase in child allowance and additional child allowance as well as an extension of the claim period for additional child allowance. Increasing child allowance based on the number of children has limited effect on encouraging taxpayers who currently do not have children. Given the above and taking into consideration the sustainability and long-term affordability of public finance, we currently have no plan to further adjust the child allowance system.
 
     In addition, to alleviate the burden of taxpayers in supporting the elderly, the Government has proposed in the 2026-27 Budget to increase the dependent parent/grandparent allowance from $50,000 to $55,000 (for dependents aged 60 or above, or disabled), and from $25,000 to $27,500 (for dependents aged 55 or above but below 60) with effect from the year of assessment 2026/27. Those who reside with their parents or grandparents throughout the whole year will continue to enjoy double allowance, which is $110,000 (for dependents aged 60 or above, or disabled) and $55,000 (for dependents aged 55 or above but below 60). The deduction ceiling for elderly residential care expenses will also be increased from $100,000 to $110,000 per eligible parent/grandparent. Taxpayers can benefit regardless of whether the dependents reside with them or in a residential care home. It is estimated that the measures will benefit about 830 000 taxpayers, resulting in a government revenue forgone of about $970 million annually. The Government currently has no plan to introduce additional tax concessionary measures for elderly care.
 
(4) “Middle class” is a loosely-defined term that generally refers to one’s economic background, academic qualification, income or asset level. Meanwhile, it may also reflect one’s living condition, lifestyle or values. There is no unified criterion to define “middle class” in society, nor is there one internationally. Therefore, establishing a clear and specific definition for “middle class” and formulating targeted policy measures to meet their specific needs may not be the most appropriate and effective approach. Adopting a broad definition may also not facilitate policy formulation.
 
     In respect of taxation, the 2025 Policy Address and the 2026-27 Budget proposed a series of measures to help reduce the tax burden of taxpayers (including the middle class), enabling them to have more disposable income for various aspects such as children’s education, housing, and medical care. Details are provided in the Annex. The Government has always been concerned about and attentive to the needs of people from different sectors of society (including the middle class), and will continue to formulate appropriate policy measures as in the past.
 
(5) In the 1990s, the Government once commissioned the Hong Kong Housing Society to launch the Sandwich Class Housing Scheme (SCHS). SCHS provided affordable housing to families whose income was above the income limit of the Home Ownership Scheme (HOS) of the Hong Kong Housing Authority but who were unable to afford private housing. Following the Government’s repositioned housing policy in 2002, SCHS came to an end in 2003. At present, the Government assists higher-income persons who are not eligible for HOS and yet cannot afford private housing to achieve home ownership through Starter Homes for Hong Kong Residents (SH) projects. The Urban Renewal Authority has launched the first two SH projects (i.e. eResidence Towers 1 and 2, and eResidence Tower 3) with a total of over 600 SH units sold. In addition, the Government is taking forward a few SH projects, the exact details and estimated completion dates of which would be announced at appropriate junctures.
Issued at HKT 12:20

NNNN

LCQ7: Hong Kong elderly residing in residential care homes in Guangdong

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

     Following is a question by the Hon Kingsley Wong and a written reply by the Secretary for Labour and Welfare, Mr Chris Sun, in the Legislative Council today (March 25):
 
Question:
 
     Regarding the Residential Care Services Scheme in Guangdong (GDRCS Scheme) and the Pilot Scheme for Elderly Recipients of Comprehensive Social Security Assistance to Reside in Residential Care Homes in Guangdong (Pilot Scheme), will the Government inform this Council:
 
(1) of the numbers of places provided by the 26 recognised service providers (i.e. designated residential care homes (RCHs)) participating in the GDRCS Scheme in respect of the GDRCS Scheme and the Pilot Scheme, and the numbers of residents, occupancy rates and numbers of persons on the waiting lists under the two schemes; 

(2) of the amount of service payment made by the authorities for each residential place in the 26 designated RCHs; how such payment compares with the subsidy level for a subsidised RCH place in Hong Kong;  
President,
 
     The Government implements the Residential Care Services Scheme in Guangdong (GDRCS Scheme) and the Pilot Scheme for Elderly Recipients of Comprehensive Social Security Assistance to Reside in Residential Care Homes in Guangdong (Pilot Scheme) to provide Hong Kong elderly persons with additional choices for retirement in the Mainland cities within the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA). In consultation with the Health Bureau and Security Bureau, we reply to the question raised by the Hon Kingsley Wong as follows:
 
(1) and (2) As at end February 2026, a total of 26 residential care homes for the elderly (RCHEs) in Guangdong joined the GDRCS Scheme, providing subsidised residential care services to 1 048 Hong Kong elderly persons. The Social Welfare Department (SWD) negotiates and signs contracts with RCHEs participating in the GDRCS Scheme, having regard to the types of the RCHEs, service packages and RCHE locations, etc, and pays the service fees based on the actual number of elderly participants of the GDRCS Scheme residing in the RCHEs. Since the service fees vary across the RCHEs and concern the contract terms made between the SWD and the RCHEs, it is not suitable for the Government to disclose the relevant details. In overall terms, the Government pays a lower fee for the residential service places in the RCHEs in Guangdong than that of subsidising local residential service places.  
 
     The Government launched the Pilot Scheme in October 2025, providing a monthly subsidy of HK$5,000 to each elderly participant, with a quota of 1 000. As at early March 2026, the SWD has received approximately 900 enquiries and 16 applications in respect of the Pilot Scheme, and has approved 10 applications. Elderly participants of the Pilot Scheme select on their own preferred RCHEs among those joining in the GDRCS Scheme and pay the RCHEs directly.
 
     The number of residents in the respective RCHEs under the GDRCS Scheme and the Pilot Scheme is set out at the Annex.
 
(3) and (4) The RCHEs participating in the GDRCS Scheme offer different number of residential service places with regard to factors such as RCHE scale, staffing arrangements and operational considerations. The SWD liaises with individual RCHEs to adjust the supply of places based on the demand, and keep on identifying more suitable RCHEs to join the GDRCS Scheme, thereby providing more choices for the elderly persons. An elderly participant of the GDRCS Scheme is free to choose any of the RCHEs under the Scheme according to personal preferences and needs. The main considerations of an elderly person when selecting an RCHE include the environment and service quality of the residential care homes, local medical support, and whether the location is convenient for family visits or for his return to Hong Kong for medical services when in need. The SWD will encourage, and provide assistance for the RCHEs to step up their publicity efforts to supply more information to the elderly persons and their families.
 
(5) The elderly Comprehensive Social Security Assistance (CSSA) recipients participating in the Pilot Scheme receive a monthly subsidy of HK$5,000 under the Pilot Scheme, as well as CSSA payment under the Portable CSSA Scheme. The actual amount of the latter depends on the health condition and number of household members of the elderly recipient.
 
     Taking a singleton elderly recipient as an example, the current average monthly CSSA payment is approximately HK$4,600 per capita. Together with the monthly subsidy of HK$5,000 provided under the Pilot Scheme, the total amount receivable is approximately HK$9,600 (approximately RMB8,500). As fees vary across different RCHEs, an elderly participant of the Pilot Scheme may select an RCHE by himself and pay the RCHE directly, having regard to the CSSA payment and subsidy received from the Government as well as his own financial circumstances. The Government does not maintain records of the living expenses of these elderly persons.
 
(6) and (7) The main target beneficiaries of the Pilot Scheme are non-frail elderly CSSA recipients. After participating in the Pilot Scheme, they may, in accordance with the requirements of their place of residence, sign up for the local Basic Medical Insurance for Urban and Rural Residents and the Commercial Medical Insurance, thereby receiving a certain level of medical protection. 
 
     Should the health condition of an elderly participant of the Pilot Scheme deteriorate, he may, after passing the assessment under the Standardised Care Need Assessment Mechanism for Elderly Services (SCNAMES), switch from the Pilot Scheme to the GDRCS Scheme, and henceforth benefit from the pilot medical subsidy arrangement applicable to the latter. The SWD has commissioned a non-governmental organisation to conduct in-situ SCNAMES assessments for Hong Kong elderly persons residing in Guangdong, including those participating in the Pilot Scheme, and to assist them in applying for joining the GDRCS Scheme if they so wish.
 
     Furthermore, eligible elderly persons, regardless of their participation in the Pilot Scheme or the GDRCS Scheme, can opt for the Elderly Health Care Voucher (EHCV) GBA Pilot Scheme and use their EHCVs to pay for outpatient healthcare services at designated departments at a total of 21 service points in the GBA Mainland cities.
 
     If Hong Kong residents are injured or suffer from an illness on the Mainland and need emergency medical and ambulance arrangements upon returning to Hong Kong, in accordance with the established arrangements, they may raise the request by contacting the Assistance to Hong Kong Residents Unit of the Immigration Department while on the Mainland.

Public library opening hours for Easter and Ching Ming Festival

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

Public library opening hours for Easter and Ching Ming Festival 
* library mobile app services, online and telephone renewal services;
* other online library services, including the library catalogue, borrowers’ record enquiries and reservations of library materials;
* self-service library stations; and
* the function of real-time loan record updates of smart book drops and smart book returns (readers may still return library materials to the smart book return facilities, and the loan records will be updated within two working days).Issued at HKT 11:57

NNNN

LCQ16: Names on signs at MTR station entrances/exits

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region – 4

     Following is a question by the Hon Chong Ho-fung and a written reply by the Secretary for Transport and Logistics, Ms Mable Chan, in the Legislative Council today (March 25):
 
     It has been reported that when the MTR Corporation Limited (MTRCL) updated the long-standing names of landmarks on individual signs at entrances/exits of the Kowloon Bay Station and Ho Man Tin Station in 2024 and 2025, this has aroused dissatisfaction among some local residents who have queried about the criteria adopted by MTRCL in changing the names on the signs. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
 
(1) whether it has enquired with MTRCL about the specific considerations of and criteria adopted by MTRCL when marking and updating the names on various types of signs at station entrances/exits; and
 
(2) whether it knows if MTRCL will communicate with relevant stakeholders and gather public views before updating the names on signs at station entrances/exits (such as deleting the existing names of landmarks) in the future; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that?
 
Reply:
 
President,
 
     Railway service is the backbone of Hong Kong’s public transport system. There are more than five million passenger trips made on the MTR every day. The Government, through the Transport Department, closely monitors the MTR’s services, including day-to-day train and station operations, to ensure that they are safe and reliable, and meet the required service level. In consultation with the MTR Corporation Limited (MTRCL), my consolidated reply to the question raised by the Hon Chong Ho-fung is as follows:
 
     The MTRCL shall provide and maintain adequate directional signs in Chinese and English in every station, so as to provide the public and passengers with clear and concise information to help them identify the most appropriate exit for reaching their destination and making their journey more convenient. These signs include exit directory boards, ceiling-mounted lightbox signage, as well as guides and location maps in the stations.
 
     With the development of the community, evolvement of the surrounding environment of stations, together with the completion of new facilities and buildings, there may be changes in the operational needs of stations and passenger travel habits. The MTRCL has been continuously reviewing and updating station signage as necessary. Taking ceiling-mounted lightbox signage as an example, the MTRCL generally prioritises displaying the nearest building to the exit, while takes into consideration any commissioning of new prominent landmarks or public facilities and passenger usage patterns across different groups in making corresponding updates.
 
     The Government acknowledges that the MTRCL has been attentive to passengers’ needs, and will continue to review the signage and information provided across the railway network to reflect development in the community around stations. The Government expects the MTRCL to maintain close communication with stakeholders proactively throughout the process to ensure the delivery of high-quality railway services to the public.

Adjustment in ceiling prices for dedicated LPG filling stations in April 2026

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

Adjustment in ceiling prices for dedicated LPG filling stations in April 2026 

Location of
Dedicated
LPG Filling StationCeiling Price in
April 2026
(HK$/litre)Ceiling Price in
March 2026
(HK$/litre)     The spokesman said that the details of the LPG international price and the auto-LPG ceiling price for each dedicated LPG filling station had been uploaded to the EMSD website (www.emsd.gov.hkIssued at HKT 11:43

NNNN

LCQ17: Disaster prevention education

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

LCQ17: Disaster prevention education 
Question:
 
     There are views that the Wang Fuk Court fire in Tai Po serves as a wake-up call for disaster prevention education in Hong Kong, and that it is necessary for the Government to strengthen relevant education at both school and community levels. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
 
(1) of the data for fire drills conducted in secondary schools, primary schools and kindergartens across the territory over the past three years (including the number of drills and the number of teachers and students participating); whether the authorities have grasped the number of schools which have failed to conduct fire drills once every six months as required by the Education Bureau (EDB);
 
(2) whether it will consider updating regulations and guidelines issued by the EDB on disaster prevention drills, requiring schools to introduce advanced drills such as “unannounced drills” or “simulation of scenarios involving trapped persons” to enhance response capability of teachers and students in the event of an actual incident;
 
(3) as there are views that current disaster prevention education in primary and secondary schools is rather fragmented, with content scattering across different subjects, and in the light of diverse disasters in modern society, will the authorities consider consolidating existing disaster prevention teaching materials to produce different levels of “teaching kit for disaster prevention activities”, and establishing a “Disaster Prevention Education Day” to raise awareness of disaster prevention among teachers and students;
 
(4) whether it will draw up practical guidelines for schools on responding to fire incidents for adherence by school teaching staff, while strengthening relevant training for teachers to ensure that they are capable for leading students to escape in the event of a fire; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that; and
 
(5) as there are views pointing out that the Fire and Ambulance Services Education Centre Cum Museum, currently located at Pak Shing Kok, Tseung Kwan O, is relatively remote, and that the quota for admission is limited, whether the authorities will draw on the experience of the Public Safety Education Training Base in Shanghai to establish a regional disaster prevention experience centre with simulated real-life scenarios, or utilise disused school premises to set up mobile experience centres, so as to popularise realistic training; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that?
 
Reply:
 
President,
 
     The Government attaches great importance to students’ safety and reminds schools to properly implement fire precautions and enhance students’ awareness of disaster prevention through disaster prevention education. Having regard to school-based circumstances, schools should identify, assess, control, and mitigate risks (including fire risk) at an early stage and formulate emergency response plans to be continuously monitored and updated in a timely manner, with a view to building a safe school environment. In consultation with the Security Bureau and the Fire Services Department (FSD), the consolidated reply to the question raised by the Hon Ken Wong is as follows:
 
(1) to (4) To mitigate the risk of fire and enhance students’ awareness and thus safeguarding their well-being, the Education Bureau (EDB) has issued guidelines and letters to remind schools of the importance of complying with the requirements stipulated in the Education Regulations and other relevant legislation, and implementing fire precautions and conducting fire drills properly to enhance the crisis awareness, responsiveness and execution capabilities of school staff and students in the event of a fire through regular drills. Schools should arrange regular inspections for all fire service installations and equipment on the school premises to ensure their good condition at all times. Fire extinguishers should be easily accessible. Additional fire extinguishers and/or fire blankets should be available in special rooms in schools, such as laboratories, design and technology/visual arts/art rooms, and computer rooms, in accordance with fire safety requirements. Schools are also reminded that server rooms, which accommodate a large number of electronic equipment, warrant particular attention to fire safety.
 
     Conducting fire drills is of high importance. According to Section 38(1) of the Education Regulations (Cap. 279A), the head of every school shall draw up a practical scheme for the evacuation of the school premises in case of fire, ensure that a fire drill including the use of all exits from the school premises is carried out by the teachers and students at least once in every six months (including the boarding section of the school), and keep a written record of all such drills in a school log book, such as the time taken to evacuate the school premises during each fire drill. The EDB does not compile statistics regarding fire drills conducted in schools.
 
     Furthermore, the FSD has provided schools with specific guidelines on drawing up emergency evacuation plans, which cover sample diagrams of the evacuation routes and actions to be taken by school staff and management staff upon discovery of fire, noticing fire alarm signal or during emergency evacuation. To enhance crisis awareness among teachers and students, schools may make fine adjustments to the simulated fire location, evacuation routes, etc, for each fire drill, lest they get used to the plan. Schools may also contact the FSD to arrange for fire safety talks, so as to enhance the fire safety knowledge and awareness of school staff and strengthen their capabilities to lead students to escape in the event of a fire.
 
     In respect of disaster prevention education, related learning content has always been embedded in various topics across the primary and secondary school curricula according to students’ cognitive abilities and developmental level. For example, the Primary Humanities curriculum enables students to understand safety precautions and contingency measures when engaging in activities under different weather conditions, as well as the impact of natural environmental changes on people and corresponding response strategies. The Secondary Geography curriculum further allows students to understand different types of natural hazards (such as earthquakes, floods and landslides) and their impacts, as well as the preventive and remedial measures adopted in Hong Kong and other regions, thereby enhancing students’ disaster-prevention awareness. For teaching resources, the Primary Humanities webpage has already featured a designated section on “Disaster Prevention Education”. The resources uploaded include the EDB’s educational multimedia videos, as well as the “Fire Escape” and “Safety Tips for Travellers” booklets produced by the FSD; while the “Geography Online Game Platform for Understanding Our Motherland” features interactive learning tasks, including the “Natural Hazard Exhibition Hall” and the “Hazard Prevention and Mitigation Challenge”. All the above resources can further enhance students’ understanding of the related response measures, thereby enhancing their disaster prevention awareness.
 
(5) The FSD attaches great importance to public fire safety education, including actively applying innovative technologies to enhance the interactivity and realism of education and training. The objective is to enable the public to acquire and practise emergency response skills in simulated yet safe situations, thereby strengthening the overall fire prevention awareness and self-rescue capabilities. As early as 2020, the FSD introduced the “Emergency Preparedness Education Bus”, which features a virtual reality game and an interactive firefighting simulation system. This allows participants to experience escaping from a fire scene, operating fire extinguishers, and using hose reels to put out a fire, etc, thereby learning the skills of “Extinguish and Prevent Fire”, “Self-help and Help Others” and “Escape and Evacuate” under the “Three Basic Skills on Emergency Preparedness”, and enhancing the participants’ self-help capabilities.
 
     To further enhance community safety education, the FSD is planning to set up two Disaster Prevention Experience Centres in Wan Chai and Tseung Kwan O. The centres will feature physical training facilities and high-tech experiential equipment that simulate various scenarios, focusing on themes such as community life support, fire safety, counter-terrorism preparedness and disaster preparedness, with an aim to equip the public with comprehensive knowledge of emergency preparedness and enhance their capabilities to respond to emergencies.
Issued at HKT 14:10

NNNN

LCQ10: Alienation restrictions for subsidised sale housing

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

LCQ10: Alienation restrictions for subsidised sale housing 
Question:
 
     Various subsidised sale housing schemes (including the Home Ownership Scheme (HOS) of the Hong Kong Housing Authority, the Subsidised Sale Flats Project and the Sandwich Class Housing Scheme (SCHS) of the Hong Kong Housing Society (HS), as well as the Starter Homes for Hong Kong Residents (SH) projects of the Urban Renewal Authority (URA) enable the public to purchase residential flats at discounted prices below market value to address their housing needs. However, these subsidised sale housing schemes are subject to different alienation restrictions. For example, the alienation of subsidised flats under SCHS and SH is subject to payment of premium, unlike HOS flats which can be sold to eligible individuals without paying premium through the White Form Secondary Market Scheme (WSM). In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
 
(1) whether it knows the number of flats with premium paid, as of the end of 2025, (i) in housing estates under HS’ Subsidised Sale Flats Project, (ii) in the 10 housing estates under SCHS, and (iii) in eResidence, which is a SH project of URA, as well as the percentage of such flats relative to the total number of flats in these housing estates; and
 
(2) given that currently under WSM, White Form applicants who do not satisfy the requirement for Green Form status but meet the income and asset limits may purchase second-hand HOS flats with premium unpaid in the HOS Secondary Market or HS’ flats with premium unpaid, whether the Government has studied the inclusion of the three types of subsidised sale housing mentioned in part (1) into WSM to facilitate the circulation of flats; if not, the reasons for that; if so, of the details, including if any study has been conducted on whether the lease conditions of these housing estates would hinder the relevant alienation arrangements, and the authorities’ corresponding measures?
 
Reply:
 
President,
 
     The Government has been committed to enhancing the housing ladder. It also helps low-to-middle-income families achieve home ownership and encourages upward mobility through various types of subsidised sale flats (SSF), including the Home Ownership Scheme (HOS) of the Hong Kong Housing Authority (HA) and the SSF projects of the Hong Kong Housing Society (HKHS).
 
     As regards the Sandwich Class Housing Scheme (SCHS) of the HKHS, it was a scheme announced in 1992 to provide affordable housing to middle-income families whose income exceeded the HOS income limit but were unable to afford private housing.  Following the Government’s repositioned housing policy in 2002, the SCHS came to an end in 2003. At present, the Government responds to the home ownership aspirations of higher-income persons who are above the HOS application threshold and yet cannot afford private housing through Starter Homes for Hong Kong Residents (SH) projects.
 
     The positionings of the SCHS and SH projects are not the same as those of the HOS of the HA and SSF of the HKHS, nonetheless these projects are also sold to eligible persons at a price lower than the market value to help them achieve home ownership. Based on the principles of effective and rational use of public housing resources as well as equity, if the owner of a flat concerned no longer wishes to reside in it, he/she has to first pay the premium in order to alienate the flat in the open market.
 
     In response to the question raised by the Hon Elaine Chik, our reply is as follows:
 
(1) As of December 2025, the number and percentage of flats with premium paid in the HKHS’s SSF, the HKHS’s SCHS and the Urban Renewal Authority (URA)’s SH projects are tabulated below:
 

Serial numberNote: All above projects are subject to alienation restriction periods. Owners of the relevant units may only apply to alienate their flats in the open market subject to payment of premium after the alienation restriction period.
 
(2) In 2017, the HA endorsed the regularisation of the White Form Secondary Market Scheme (WSM) to address the demand for SSF among low-to-middle-income white-form applicants. The quota increased significantly from 2 500 in the first phase after regularisation (i.e. WSM 2018) to 7 000 as announced in the 2025 Policy Address. The WSM adopts the same income and asset limits as those under the HOS, allowing eligible persons to purchase the HA’s HOS flats or designated SSF provided by the HKHS with premium unpaid. As for the SCHS and SH projects, as mentioned above, their target groups are higher-income persons who are above the HOS application threshold yet cannot afford private housing. The positionings of the SCHS and SH projects are not the same as those of the HOS of HA and SSF of the HKHS, and hence the former are not included under the WSM. In addition, the stock of flats under the two schemes concerned is limited, and thus the setting up of a separate secondary market for them would not be practical. Although the land leases of the relevant housing estates do not provide for a secondary market, owners who wish to alienate their flats may do so in the open market subject to payment of premium, and since these units were sold at a smaller discount, the amount of premium to be paid would also be lower. We will continue to closely monitor the housing demand-supply situation and optimise the housing ladder at appropriate junctures, so as to encourage upward mobility of our citizens and help them achieve home ownership.
Issued at HKT 12:45

NNNN

Inaugural Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao-Shenzhen Joint Financial Regulatory Meeting

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

Inaugural Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao-Shenzhen Joint Financial Regulatory Meeting       
     During the meeting, participants exchanged views on industry developments, supervisory work and latest market trends. They also discussed other key topics including banking support for the development of the international innovation and technology hub in the Greater Bay Area, regulatory oversight of AI development and application in the banking sector, as well as insurance services to enhance high-quality city development, facilitation of convenient cross-boundary medical insurance services, and the protection of consumer interests. Through enhanced financial regulatory co-operation and consensus building among Guangdong, Hong Kong, Macao, and Shenzhen, the meeting actively promoted high-quality development of the banking and insurance sectors, contributing to the stable development of financial markets and consumer protection.
Issued at HKT 19:00

NNNN

Brussels ETO concludes Year of Horse celebration events with receptions in Portugal and Romania

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

Brussels ETO concludes Year of Horse celebration events with receptions in Portugal and Romania               
     At the reception in Bucharest, Ms Yung also invited Romanian professionals in the information technology sector, which is one of the key economic drivers of Romania, to develop or expand their businesses in Hong Kong through the services provided by the Hong Kong Trade Development Council (HKTDC) and Invest Hong Kong (InvestHK). 
      
     Together with the HKTDC and InvestHK, Brussels ETO also held a business seminar before the reception in Bucharest with the local wine and liquor trade to promote the business opportunities that Hong Kong offers as a leading hub for wine and liquor trading and auctions, following Hong Kong’s reduction of duty on liquor with an alcoholic strength of more than 30 per cent in 2024.  
 
     The guests of the reception in Bucharest were greeted by a curated performance by Hong Kong musicians based in Europe, featuring a celebratory medley that bridged Chinese and European musical traditions in a contemporary style, showcasing the talents of Hong Kong’s artists as well as the city’s vibrant cultural heritage and spirit of creativity.
Issued at HKT 18:55

NNNN