Ombudsman’s latest annual report presents remarkable supervisory efforts and initiatives to prevent maladministration

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

The following is issued on behalf of the Office of The Ombudsman:

     The Ombudsman, Mr Jack Chan, today (July 8) presented the 2025-26 Annual Report of The Ombudsman to the public. In the reporting year, the Office achieved remarkable results in all three strategic focuses championed by the Ombudsman, and further stepped up its supervisory role to bring about tangible improvements in public administration. The Office also exceeded all its service targets in handling enquiries, complaints, reassessment and review of complaints.      
     The Office is committed to fostering a positive complaint culture in all sectors of society through a variety of channels, with particular focus on encouraging the younger generation to adopt a constructive mindset and actively participate in public affairs. Throughout the year, it organised 17 talks at universities, tertiary institutions and secondary schools, and participated in seven career fairs, reaching out to more than 66 000 young people. The Ombudsman’s Awards presented annually continued to honour departments, organisations and public officers for excellence in enhancing public services, with a new Team Award introduced in this reporting year. In addition, appreciation letters and certificates were issued under the dual-track commendation scheme to departments, organisations and members of the public in recognition of their contribution to the enhancement of public administration.
      
     In exercising its supervisory functions, the Office completed 10 direct investigation operations and concluded 46 cases by full investigation during the year. A total of 573 recommendations, more than double the previous year’s figure, were made to drive substantive reforms across various areas of public administration, all of which were accepted by the departments and organisations concerned. In complaint cases where no or only minor maladministration is involved, the Office makes constructive observations, highlighting areas for improvement while acknowledging the positive measures taken by the departments or organisations concerned. During the year, a total of 912 observations were made under this initiative.

LCQ14: Attracting Mainland’s new energy vehicle industry to set up businesses in Hong Kong

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

Following is a question by the Hon Wu Yingpeng and a written reply by the Secretary for Innovation, Technology and Industry, Professor Sun Dong, in the Legislative Council today (July 8):

Question:

The country’s 15th Five-Year Plan clearly sets out the nurturing and strengthening of emerging and future industries, accelerating the development of the next-generation intelligent, connected new energy vehicle industry. There are views that Hong Kong could lead the way in shifting towards green transport locally and help the country’s new energy vehicle industry go global. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:

(1) in the past five years, (i) of the number of enterprises related to the Mainland’s new energy vehicle industrial chain that have listed on the Hong Kong stock market and the amount of capital they have raised; and (ii) of the list of key enterprises engaged in the related fields of intelligent driving, new energy and AI that have set up businesses in Hong Kong, as compiled to date by the Office for Attracting Strategic Enterprises (OASES), and among which, the figures on the business areas involved, the number of jobs created, the amount of investment attracted and the economic value generated;

(2) how the Government assesses Hong Kong’s role in attracting Mainland new energy vehicle enterprises to list in Hong Kong, in promoting international co-operation within the industrial and supply chains, and in facilitating an efficient logistics system; whether the Government has any plans to refine the OASES policies further and offer land and tax incentives to attract more leading national-level enterprises in the new energy vehicle supply chain (including those supplying batteries, chips and software) to establish regional headquarters or research and development centres in Hong Kong; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that;

(3) in planning the Northern Metropolis, whether the Government has set aside land for an “advanced manufacturing and testing base for intelligent connected vehicles” in order to attract the clustering of enterprises from across the entire industrial chain; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that;

(4) whether the Government has any plans to strengthen co-operation with the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area (Greater Bay Area) in the new energy vehicle industrial chain, for example by jointly establishing test sites, data-sharing platforms and demonstration zones for intelligent connected vehicles to achieve complementary advantages with Hong Kong in standard setting, testing and certification, and international recognition; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that;

(5) as intelligent connected vehicles rely heavily on map navigation, AI algorithms and vehicle-road coordination data, and in light of the need to ensure national security and personal privacy, whether the Government has any plans to collaborate with relevant Mainland authorities to explore the establishment of a “cross-border compliant data flow mechanism” for intelligent vehicle data and unified security certification standards within the framework of the Greater Bay Area, with a view to supporting the research, development and practical application of cross‑border autonomous driving technology; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that; and

(6) whether the Government will consider encouraging Hong Kong’s higher education institutions and research institutions to collaborate with Mainland automotive manufacturers, focusing on breakthroughs in key core technologies such as battery technology, autonomous driving and solid batteries, so as to support the upgrading of the Mainland’s new energy vehicle industry; in its talent recruitment policies, will the Government consider introducing specific preferential and facilitative measures (e.g. in the areas of taxation, housing and education) for high-calibre international innovation and technology talents in fields such as automotive engineering, in-vehicle software and the Internet of Things; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that?

Reply:

President:

The Government has been actively integrating into the overall development of the country, meeting the country’s needs with Hong Kong’s strength. As an international financial centre and innovation and technology (I&T) hub with the unique advantage of “one country, two systems”, Hong Kong can not only accelerate its local green transition in transport to implement the Climate Action Plan 2050, but also play a dual role as a two-way springboard to bring in and go global, thereby facilitating the internationalisation of the country’s new energy vehicle industry chain.

According to the Environment and Ecology Bureau, in promoting local green transport transformation, the Government announced the Updated Version of the Hong Kong Roadmap on Popularisation of Electric Vehicles (the Updated Roadmap) in February 2026, setting out a series of pragmatic measures to facilitate the development of the electric vehicle (EV) market, with a view to achieving zero vehicular emissions before 2050. As mentioned in the Updated Roadmap, Chinese Mainland now stands as the world’s largest and most dynamic EV market. Hong Kong will continue to promote EV adoption and actively seize the opportunities presented by our country’s rapid advancement in the EV industry. The Government will provide policy support and co-ordination to enterprises seeking to promote EVs in Hong Kong, facilitating the implementation of their projects in Hong Kong. Leveraging Hong Kong’s position as an international fintech hub, it will serve as a “bridgehead” for global expansion, facilitating the overseas growth of the country’s EV industry while advancing the global popularisation of EVs.

Having consulted the Environment and Ecology Bureau, the Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau, the Development Bureau, the Transport and Logistics Bureau, the Education Bureau, the Housing Bureau, and the Office for Attracting Strategic Enterprises (OASES), our reply to the question raised by the Hon WU Yingpeng is as follows:

(1) Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited (HKEX) has introduced a series of reforms to the listing regime in recent years, broadening the fundraising channels for enterprises and facilitating listing by different companies in Hong Kong. Notably, HKEX introduced the listing regime for specialist technology companies in 2023, enabling eligible specialist technology enterprises to list and raise funds under such new listing regime. According to HKEX’s guidance, various sectors related to the new energy vehicle industrial chain (including the manufacturing and/or deployment of autonomous vehicles (AVs) and EVs and development of relevant enabling technologies, including the use of new energy solutions in electric vehicles, location technology) have been included in the acceptable sectors within the specialist technology industries. In the past five years, over 10 enterprises related to the Mainland’s new energy vehicle industrial chain were listed in Hong Kong, with about $120 billion funds raised. The Government will continue to drive HKEX to enhance its listing mechanism and provide guidance to enterprises, thereby facilitating more high-quality companies to list and raise funds in Hong Kong.

Since its establishment, the OASES has been proactively attracting enterprises of significant strategic value to Hong Kong. Focusing on core strategic industries such as “advanced manufacturing and new energy technologies”, and “AI and data science”, OASES identifies target enterprises, assesses their needs for setting up in Hong Kong, and provides tailored facilitation (one enterprise one policy) and one stop support for their establishment. To date, OASES has announced six batches of key enterprises, comprising a total of 124 companies that have established a presence in Hong Kong or expanded their operations, among them over 50 per cent are listed companies; over 70 per cent have set up global or regional headquarters in Hong Kong; and nearly 90 per cent have established or are establishing research and development (R&D) centres locally. Many of these enterprises are global industry leaders with cutting edge technologies, choosing Hong Kong as the location for their global or regional headquarters, R&D centres, or supply chain management hubs, thereby creating a notable clustering effect within Hong Kong’s I&T ecosystem.

In the area of intelligent driving, several enterprises with leading technological strengths have established in Hong Kong, including PCITECH, Baidu Apollo and WeRide, which are actively participating in local autonomous driving tests. Westwell and UISEE Technology have also deployed unmanned driving solutions at Hong Kong International Airport, further enhancing the local testing environment for intelligent driving.

In the area of new energy technologies, multiple leading enterprises along the new energy vehicle value chain have established in Hong Kong, including CATL, Gotion High-tech, Guofu Hydrogen, Tianqi Lithium, NaaS Technology, and Li Auto. Their operations span upstream materials, midstream battery R&D, vehicle manufacturing and energy supplement networks, contributing to the development of a more complete new energy vehicle industry ecosystem in Hong Kong.

In the area of AI and data science, strategic enterprises cover both computing power infrastructure and large model development, including Hygon, Arm China, Biren Technology, MetaX, Zhipu AI and MiniMax.

(2) The Government’s policies to promote the development of strategic industries are not confined to existing land and tax arrangements. Rather, in line with the National 15th Five-Year Plan and Hong Kong’s industrial development needs, the Government is strengthening its policy tools to attract more globally influential leading enterprises along the new energy vehicle supply chain to establish a presence in Hong Kong. The Government has proposed in the 2025 Policy Address and the 2026-27 Budget the formulation of a preferential policy package to promote industry and investment, covering tools such as land grants, land premiums, subsidies and tax incentives.

On land policy, the Government is enhancing the attractiveness of settlement conditions through institutional innovation in areas such as land allocation and land-use planning within the Northern Metropolis. Where appropriate, the Government adopts a “dual-envelope system” for tendering, ensuring that land premium is no longer the primary consideration; instead, greater emphasis is placed on enterprises’ contributions to industry-chain development, technical capabilities, and R&D investment. The Government also introduces the Northern Metropolis Development Bill for First Reading today. The policy measures therein include streamlining planning procedures for the Northern Metropolis, facilitating the adoption of innovative construction technologies, designs, and materials, as well as facilitating cross-boundary research activities and talent flow, which are expected to further enhance the Northern Metropolis’ attractiveness to national-level new energy vehicle enterprises.

(3) The Hetao Hong Kong Park and the San Tin Technopole are the heartlands of Hong Kong’s future I&T industry development. As one of the country’s major I&T co-operation platforms in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area, the Loop has been reserved by the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government with sufficient land for multiple strategic technology sectors (including new energy technology and AI which are closely related to the next-generation automobile industry) to foster cross-sectoral collaboration and technological breakthroughs. The San Tin Technopole, as a natural extension of the Loop, provides a co-ordinated development at the upstream, midstream and downstream levels together with the Hetao Hong Kong Park in the Loop, creating a comprehensive industrial ecosystem. While the Loop focuses on R&D, commercialisation, and pilot production at the upstream and midstream levels, the San Tin Technopole will provide a large piece of land, which can help accelerate the commercialisation of R&D results by providing industrial space for prototyping, pilot and mass production. The planning of San Tin Technopole also allows certain flexibility in development by reserving strategic white space for supporting emerging technology industries at subsequent phases in the future.

(4) and (5) According to the Transport and Logistics Bureau, the Transport Strategy Blueprint promulgated by the Government early this year proposed promoting cross-boundary AV projects, such as the cross-boundary AV shuttle services travelling among Hong Kong, Zhuhai and Macao via the Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge (HZMB), to deepen integration in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area in respect of transport services. The Government is conducting in-depth discussions with relevant Mainland authorities on matters relating to the cross-boundary AV project at the HZMB, including regulatory and supervisory co-ordination, safety standards, cross-boundary data compliance, vehicle data and cybersecurity.

To facilitate the development of autonomous driving technology, the Government implemented a new regulatory framework for AVs in March 2024. Concurrently, the Transport Department (TD) published the Code of Practice for Trial and Pilot Use of Autonomous Vehicles (the Code), setting out the detailed technical, safety and operational requirements for the trial and use of AVs, with a view to facilitating the trial and pilot use of AVs. Under the new regulatory framework, the Government is actively and orderly promoting the development of AVs in Hong Kong. As of June 2026, the TD has issued seven pilot licences involving 63 AVs for trials in seven locations respectively (namely North Lantau, the West Kowloon Cultural District, Cyberport in the Southern District, the Kai Tak Development area in Kowloon East, the Airportcity Link, the “Park & Fly” carpark at the Hong Kong Port of HZMB, and Siu Ho Wan).

The relevant legislation for AVs has incorporated the National Standard on Taxonomy of Driving Automation for Vehicles to enhance compatibility with Mainland laws. The TD has also all along accepted national standards as proof that vehicles or their components comply with the relevant vehicle construction standards and technical requirements. Furthermore, in drawing up the Code, the TD has made reference to the AV testing experience in the Chinese Mainland, with a view to aligning with the Chinese Mainland on the technical front. For instance, regarding testing sites, the Code accepts closed-road testing conducted in accordance with national standards, thereby expediting the approval of trial applications.

(6) The Education Bureau has all along supported the higher education institutions to make reference to the manpower needs suggested by various Government bureaux and departments, and offer programmes that meet the social and economic development needs of Hong Kong. The University Grants Committee (UGC)-funded universities offered various programmes related to “smart engineering” and “smart manufacturing” in the 2025/26 academic year, nurturing talents to master and utilise new technologies, promoting intelligent production lines, thereby driving the development of high-end and high-value-added industries. Amongst others, some of the UGC-funded universities have been conducting collaborative research with Chinese Mainland vehicle companies on areas such as AV systems, fuel cells for new energy vehicles, and AI for driving technology.

Moreover, the Innovation, Technology and Industry Bureau is expediting the establishment of the third InnoHK research cluster, focusing on sustainable development, energy, advanced manufacturing, and materials. Eight research centres will be set up under the cluster, some of which will be dedicated to core technology development in areas such as high-performance solid battery, charging and energy storage systems, and smart grids. These centres will collaborate closely with leading universities and industry partners from both the Chinese Mainland and overseas (including the Chinese Mainland automotive manufacturers), to drive the application of relevant technologies in high-end sectors such as electric and hydrogen vehicles. In addition, under the existing cluster of AIR@InnoHK which specialises in AI and robotics technologies, certain research centres are also actively exploring potential collaboration with the Chinese Mainland automotive enterprises and research institutions to support the upgrading of the country’s new energy vehicle industry, with a view to fostering sustainable development.

On attracting talents, the Government has launched an array of talent admission measures to attract and facilitate talents from all over the world to pursue development in Hong Kong. Among them, the Technology Talent Admission Scheme provides a fast-track arrangement for admitting overseas and Chinese Mainland technology talent to undertake R&D work in Hong Kong. The Government launched in late 2025 further enhancement measurements to the scheme, including (i) streamlining application procedures to allow technology companies and eligible talents to submit applications for quotas and visas/entry permits in parallel; (ii) lifting the requirement of engaging in R&D in 14 designated technology areas to better respond to the rapidly changing I&T landscape; and (iii) in addition to the existing Science Park and Cyberport, launching a new dedicated application channel for the Hong Kong-Shenzhen Innovation and Technology Park to provide one-stop assistance to their tenants and incubatees in application and subsequent follow-up action. Companies from the fields of automotive engineering, in-vehicle software and the Internet of Things may engage technology talents to undertake R&D work in Hong Kong through the enhanced scheme.

On the other hand, salaries tax in Hong Kong is calculated at progressive rates. For high-income earners, the current two-tiered standard rates (i.e. 15 per cent for the first $5 million of net income and 16 per cent for the remainder) are already lower than those in other jurisdictions. The Government also provides various allowances and tax deductions, covering personal allowances and expenses on supporting family members, health insurance, self-education, retirement schemes, and housing. Therefore, the current salaries tax regime is already rather attractive to outside talents. To complement relevant industrial development, the Government has also reserved planning flexibility on various sites earmarked for industrial use within the Northern Metropolis (such as the I&T sites in San Tin Technopole) to allow for the construction of talent apartments.

Ends/Wednesday, July 8, 2026
Issued at HKT 14:52
NNNN

LCQ22: Promoting mutual access in terms of asset and wealth management

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

Following is a question by the Hon Robert Lee and a written reply by the Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury, Mr Christopher Hui, in the Legislative Council today (July 8):

Question:

The National 15th Five-Year Plan clearly supports Hong Kong in strengthening its functions as an international asset and wealth management centre. There are views that there is room for further improvement in the Mainland-Hong Kong Mutual Recognition of Funds arrangement, operation of the Integrated Fund Platform under the Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited (HKEX), as well as the sales and promotion arrangements under the Cross-boundary Wealth Management Connect (Cross-boundary WMC) Scheme in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area, in order to facilitate development of the asset and wealth management industry in Hong Kong. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:

(1) whether the Government will step up negotiations with the Mainland regulatory authorities to further increase the number of funds mutually recognised between the Mainland and Hong Kong, so as to cover all funds authorised by the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC);

(2) whether it will study the establishment of a dedicated committee and engagement of industry players to jointly review and enhance the operation of HKEX’s Integrated Fund Platform; and urge HKEX to expedite expansion of the services provided by the Platform to include one-stop services such as fund trading (including funds authorised by SFC), settlement and analysis;

(3) given that the Hong Kong Monetary Authority introduced enhancement measures for the Cross-boundary WMC Scheme last year, including the establishment of the “Three-party Online Conference”, to facilitate promotion and sales efforts under the Southbound Scheme, whether the Government will, against this background, further discuss with the Mainland authorities the implementation of relaxation measures to allow financial services practitioners in the Mainland and Hong Kong to have direct mutual market access under a system of mutual recognition of licenses so that they can conduct offline product sales and promotion with physical presence in both markets;

(4) whether it will explore with the Mainland further expansion of the scope of investment products under the Cross-boundary WMC Scheme and the enhancement of efficiency of the relevant approval process; and whether it will consider enhancing the relevant measures under the Cross-boundary WMC Scheme to encourage Mainland securities dealers to collaborate with more securities dealers in Hong Kong; if so, of the details; and

(5) given that the Pilot Programme to Enhance Talent Training for the Asset and Wealth Management Sector had concluded at the end of March this year, whether the Government will consider relaunching and regularising the Programme, with a view to continuously nurturing more relevant talents to address the development needs of the industry?

Reply:

President,

The National 15th Five-Year Plan clearly supports strengthening Hong Kong’s functions as an international asset and wealth management centre. The Government has been working in concert with the financial industry to continuously improve the financial infrastructure and ecosystem, enrich investment products and risk management tools, and deepen the mutual access with capital markets of different places. These measures have been bearing fruit. According to the Asset and Wealth Management Activities Survey 2025 just published by the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), Hong Kong’s assets under management in 2025 jumped 20 per cent year-on-year to a record high of $42.2 trillion, with net fund inflow surging 193 per cent year-on-year to $2.1 trillion. In addition, Hong Kong has become the world’s largest cross-boundary wealth management centre and it is projected that, from 2025 to 2030, the cross-boundary wealth managed by Hong Kong will grow by 9 per cent on average annually, maintaining first place globally. To maintain the strong growth momentum, the Government recently introduced a bill to the Legislative Council on June 24 for further enhancing the preferential tax regimes for funds, single family offices and carried interest, with a view to attracting more global capital to be managed in Hong Kong.

In consultation with the SFC, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority and the Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited (HKEX), the reply to the various parts of the question is as follows:

(1) The Government is committed to enhancing the mutual market access mechanism with the Mainland. The Mainland-Hong Kong Mutual Recognition of Funds arrangement (the Arrangement) was launched in July 2015, where eligible Mainland and Hong Kong funds can be offered to retail investors in each other’s market through a streamlined vetting process. The regulators of the two places implemented enhancement measures starting from January 1, 2025, which include relaxing the sales restriction of mutual recognition funds in the other market and allowing Hong Kong mutual recognition funds (i.e. Hong Kong funds authorised to be offered in the Mainland market) to delegate investment management functions to overseas asset management companies within the same group. The measures enhanced the flexibility and scale of the Arrangement, where a total of 85 funds were authorised by the regulators of the two places as of end-May 2026. In 2025, the net subscription amount of Hong Kong mutual recognition funds on the Mainland reached RMB82.5 billion, representing a 2.3-fold increase year-on-year.

The SFC has been maintaining close communication with local fund managers to encourage them to actively participate in the Arrangement, having regard to factors such as their business development plans. The Government and regulators will continue discussions with Mainland counterparts on different enhancement measures for the mutual market access mechanism to support market development.

(2) The Integrated Fund Platform (IFP) established by HKEX has been well received by the fund industry since its launch. The IFP introduced earlier the “Fund Repository” providing a one-stop information portal for investors to access key details on funds authorised by the SFC, as well as the “Order Routing Service” enhancing connectivity between market participants of all sizes across the fund value chain to elevate operational efficiencies in fund distribution. As at end-May 2026, the IFP has successfully attracted 55 financial institutions, including fund houses, distributors and transfer agents.

The IFP is expected to launch the “Platform and Nominee Services” in the second half of 2026, expanding its services to include the provision of nominee services, as well as the facilitation of payments and settlement, so as to enhance market efficiency and lower transaction costs. During the planning, preparation and operation of the IFP, HKEX as always will continue to maintain close communication with regulators and industry stakeholders to enhance the efficiency of the IFP and promote broader industry participation in the platform.

(3) and (4) Cross-boundary Wealth Management Connect (WMC) in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA) provides GBA residents with a formal, direct and convenient channel for cross-boundary investment in diverse wealth management products and marks a milestone in the financial development of the GBA.

Regarding mutual recognition of professional qualifications with the Mainland, for the securities and futures sector, the SFC and the China Securities Regulatory Commission have implemented an arrangement for mutual recognition of professional qualifications, and simplified the relevant procedures for obtaining securities practising registration and applying for the futures or fund practising qualifications on the Mainland. Hong Kong professionals with relevant licence issued by the SFC only need to pass the Mainland’s examination on the relevant laws and regulations; the examination on the foundation paper is not required. For the banking sector, the Hong Kong Institute of Bankers and the China Banking Association signed the Memorandum of Understanding on Mutual Recognition of Personal Wealth Management Qualification Certificates (MoU) in 2009, officially launching the mutual recognition mechanism. Subsequently, the two sides signed addendums in 2010, 2015 and 2022 to improve the relevant arrangements. Under the MoU, financial practitioners from the Mainland and Hong Kong can obtain “dual qualifications” (Level 1 of Qualification Certificate of Banking Professional in the Mainland and the Associate Retail Wealth Professional in Hong Kong) through the mutual recognition mechanism. Hong Kong will continue to examine enhancement measures with Mainland regulators to explore ways of broadening Hong Kong professionals’ entry into the Mainland market, thereby increasing the flexibility in the provision of human capital for the Mainland and Hong Kong markets.

As an innovative financial co-operation measure in the GBA involving three different regulatory systems of the Mainland, Hong Kong and Macao, the WMC has been implemented under a pilot approach in a gradual and incremental manner. Under the current regulations on the Mainland, Mainland brokers are already allowed to collaborate with multiple Hong Kong brokers to participate in the WMC. Regarding the product scope, “WMC 2.0” has also scoped in (1) all non-complex funds domiciled in Hong Kong, authorised by the SFC and primarily investing in Greater China equity (with no limitation on risk ratings), (2) other low- to medium-high-risk funds (excluding single emerging market equity funds and high-yield bond funds), (3) low- to medium-risk and non-complex bonds, etc.

Following the launch of “WMC 2.0” in February 2024, the number of Mainland investors investing in Hong Kong’s wealth products has increased from about 25 000 to about 126 000. As of end-May 2026, over 181 000 individual investors participated in the WMC, and cross-boundary fund remittances (including Guangdong, Hong Kong and Macao) totalled over RMB138 billion. The Government and the financial regulators will closely monitor market developments and the operation of the WMC, maintain close communication, regularly review the implementation of “WMC 2.0”, and explore further enhancement measures with Mainland regulatory authorities.

(5) The Pilot Programme to Enhance Talent Training for the Asset and Wealth Management Sector was implemented from August 2016 to March 2026. Under the Pilot Programme, over 1 130 tertiary students completed internships, and 5 700 subsidy applications for eligible course fees were approved. The Pilot Programme effectively prompted the industry in offering a variety of professional training courses and student internship opportunities, thereby enhancing the professional competence of practitioners and laying the foundation for talent training and development in the asset and wealth management sector. The Government will continue to work closely with the industry to review the talent development policy and measures in light of market needs.

Ends/Wednesday, July 8, 2026
Issued at HKT 14:58
NNNN

LCQ1: Promoting high-quality development of tourism industry

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

Following is a question by the Hon Jonathan Stuart Lamport and a reply by the Secretary for Culture, Sports and Tourism, Miss Rosanna Law, in the Legislative Council today (July 8):

Question:

The Government is vigorously developing the mega event economy to promote the development of the tourism industry. However, while the number of visitor arrivals increased by 12 per cent year-on-year last year, the increase in overnight visitors was only 6 per cent. There are views that although the ancillary facilities for cross-boundary transport following mega events facilitate travel for visitors, they also encourage visitors to depart immediately after the events, thereby preventing the mega event economy from transforming into actual economic benefits. Regarding promoting the high-quality development of the tourism industry, will the Government inform this Council:

(1) of the expenditure and revenue for each mega economic event organised or subsidised by the Government in the past three years, as well as the details of the per capita spending in Hong Kong by overnight and same-day visitors participating in these events; whether it has assessed the actual economic impact on local sectors, such as catering, retail and hotel, caused by the large number of visitors who do not stay overnight after participating in mega events;

(2) of the ways to promote the high-quality development of Hong Kong’s tourism industry, ensuring that the visitor flows generated by the mega event economy can effectively transform into commercial dividends, so that sectors such as catering, retail, hotel, public transport and various leisure experiences can benefit comprehensively; and

(3) given that the Government has been vigorously exploring international tourism in recent years, and it is learnt that foreign investors are considering building hotels on outlying islands to develop a resort destination similar to Bali in Indonesia, whether the Government will consider providing assistance?

Reply:

Thank you, President.

Mega events are a vital engine driving Hong Kong’s tourism and economic development. On the one hand, mega events directly attract visitors to Hong Kong, boosting consumption in sectors such as hotels, catering, and retail; on the other hand, they create employment opportunities in industries such as transport, logistics, and event production. The benefits of mega event economy should not be measured solely by whether visitors stay overnight. Even if some visitors arrive and depart on the same day, they generate actual spending on transport, catering, and experiential activities, etc, thereby driving the development of the entire industry chain. In particular, since its opening last year, the Kai Tak Sports Park (KTSP) has achieved a critical breakthrough for “Mega Events + Tourism”. To date, the Kai Tak Stadium has hosted over 60 major sports events and concerts, attracting over 2.4 million spectators, effectively driving surrounding consumption and employment, and injecting tangible momentum into the local economy. The continuous rise in visitor arrivals also reflects the success of the “Mega Events + Tourism” strategy. In the first half of 2026, visitor arrivals to Hong Kong reached about 26.71 million, representing a year-on-year increase of 13 per cent, with Mainland and non-Mainland visitors increasing by 16 per cent and 5 per cent year-on-year respectively.

In response to the Hon Jonathan Stuart Lamport’s question, my reply is as follows:

(1) In recent years, the Government, in collaboration with the Hong Kong Tourism Board (HKTB), has promoted various mega events to foster the integrated development of culture, sports, and tourism. Over the past three years, the “M” Mark System and the Mega Arts and Cultural Events Fund have supported a total of 95 events, involving an amount of approximately $1,125.04 million. The HKTB will also continue to enhance the scale of its six flagship events and introduce new elements to attract more visitors to Hong Kong.

Regarding visitor spending, there is a structural shift in visitor consumption patterns, moving from a previous focus on shopping to a greater emphasis on culture and experiences. In recent years, the per capita spending of overnight and same-day visitors remained at levels of over $5,000 and $1,000 respectively. In 2025, the per capita spending of overnight visitors rose slightly from $5,490 in 2024 to $5,503, and it is expected to increase slightly to $5,530 in 2026. For same-day visitors, per capita spending was adjusted from $1,235 in 2024 to $1,139 in 2025, and is expected to remain at a similar level in 2026. Although some visitors attending mega events do not stay overnight, they still spend on transport, catering, and entertainment. Taking the KTSP as an example, each event can create nearly 10 000 temporary jobs, and the actual economic contribution far exceeds ticket revenues and visitor spending. Benefiting from the robust growth in visitor arrivals, the tourism expenditure associated to inbound tourism in 2025 rose by 13 per cent over the previous year to $217.5 billion, and is expected to further increase by about 10 per cent to $238.1 billion in 2026.

(2) In response to changing visitor travel patterns, we are adopting a “Mega Events+” strategy to promote high-quality tourism development. Mega events are upgraded from standalone items into cross-period, cross-district themed experiences, with a view to extending visitors’ stay in Hong Kong and broadening consumption scenarios so that catering, retail, hotels, and transport can all benefit. Taking the Hong Kong Rugby Sevens this year as an example, the three-day event attracted over 113 000 spectators, with over 30 per cent being non-local visitors. In the same week, the Tradition HKFC 10s and the “Racing with Rugby” activities at Happy Valley Racecourse were also held. Complemented by city-wide celebrations and catering discounts, this successfully stimulated the surrounding economy. On cultural mega events, “Art March” this year linked up multiple cultural events spanning the entire month, with Art Basel Hong Kong and Art Central jointly attracting around 55 000 visitor admissions. To further amplify the benefits of mega events, the HKTB will leverage major events in August this year, such as the Hong Kong Football Festival 2026 and the musical “CATS”, to proactively collaborate with merchants across different districts to launch a new round of ticket stub discounts. It will also upgrade the Hong Kong Wine & Dine Festival, one of its flagship events, into a month-long “November Gourmet Month” to entice visitors to extend their stay in Hong Kong. We will also continue our efforts to bring major cultural, sports and tourism events to Hong Kong. For example, we have successfully secured the “HYROX World Championships 2027” to be held in Hong Kong for the first time.

Meetings, incentive travel, conventions and exhibitions tourism is a major source of high value-added overnight visitors. The Government, together with the HKTB, is actively striving to secure major international conventions and exhibitions to be staged in Hong Kong. For example, the five‑day 108th Lions International Convention successfully concluded yesterday (July 7), attracting around 17 000 delegates from across the globe. Some delegates also travelled to the city with their family members, generating demand for over 10 000 hotel rooms and boosting spending in catering, retail and related sectors, with significant economic benefits. In May this year, the HKTB also signed a three-year Memorandum of Understanding with Informa Markets, a leading global trade exhibition organiser, to introduce a portfolio of premium international exhibitions, such as supercars and luxurious yachts, to Hong Kong, thereby attracting international high-end business visitors. Concurrently, the HKTB is actively expanding potential and high value-added source markets, such as the Middle East, to increase the proportion of overnight visitors.

(3) Hong Kong possesses unique coastal and island resources, with an edge in developing island tourism. The Government welcomes interested organisations to make good use of these natural resources to develop integrated resort projects on the premise of respecting and protecting the ecological environment, thereby offering visitors novel and diverse tourism experiences. If any organisation raises concrete proposal, the Culture, Sports and Tourism Bureau is pleased to actively explore with relevant organisations and serve as a facilitator, co-ordinating with relevant bureaux and departments to remove administrative barriers and jointly foster the development.

Ends/Wednesday, July 8, 2026
Issued at HKT 15:05
NNNN

Special traffic arrangements for race meeting in Happy Valley

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region – 4

The Police will implement special traffic arrangements in Happy Valley today (July 8). These arrangements will remain in effect until the race meeting has concluded, spectators have dispersed, and traffic conditions return to normal.

A. Traffic arrangements before the commencement of the first race

The following road closure and traffic diversions will be implemented from 50 minutes before the start of the first race for day racing, or from 6pm onwards for night racing:

1. Road closure

 Southbound Wong Nai Chung Road between Queen’s Road East and the up-ramp outside the Hong Kong Jockey Club (HKJC) will be closed, except for vehicles heading for Aberdeen Tunnel.

2. Traffic diversions

– Southbound Wong Nai Chung Road between Village Road and the up-ramp outside the HKJC will be rerouted one way northbound;
– Traffic along eastbound Queen’s Road East heading for Wan Chai and Happy Valley will be diverted to turn left to Morrison Hill Road;
– Traffic along southbound Morrison Hill Road heading for Happy Valley will be diverted via Sports Road and Wong Nai Chung Road;
– Traffic along Queen’s Road East cannot turn right to Wong Nai Chung Road, except for vehicles heading for Aberdeen Tunnel;
– Traffic from Cross Harbour Tunnel heading for Queen’s Road East will be diverted via the down-ramp leading from southbound Canal Road flyover to Morrison Hill Road to turn right at the junction of Wong Nai Chung Road and Queen’s Road East; and
– Traffic from Cross Harbour Tunnel heading for Happy Valley or Racecourse will be diverted via the down-ramp leading from southbound Canal Road flyover to Canal Road East, southbound Morrison Hill Road, Sports Road and Wong Nai Chung Road.

B. Traffic arrangements before the conclusion of race meeting

     The following road closure and traffic diversions will be implemented from about 35 minutes before the start of the last race:

1. Road closure

– The up-ramp on Wong Nai Chung Road outside the HKJC leading to Aberdeen Tunnel;
– Southbound Wong Nai Chung Road between Queen’s Road East and the up-ramp leading to Aberdeen Tunnel;
– Southbound Wong Nai Chung Road between Village Road and the Public Stands of the HKJC;
– Westbound Leighton Road between Wong Nai Chung Road and Canal Road East; and
– Southbound Morrison Hill Road between Leighton Road and Queen’s Road East.

     In addition, southbound Wong Nai Chung Road between the up-ramp leading to Aberdeen Tunnel and the Public Stands of the HKJC will be closed from about 10 minutes before the start of the last race.

2. Traffic diversions

– Eastbound Queen’s Road East at its junction with Morrison Hill Road will be reduced to one-lane traffic heading for northbound Canal Road flyover;
– Traffic from Cross Harbour Tunnel heading for Wan Chai will be diverted via the down-ramp leading from southbound Canal Road flyover to Canal Road East, U-turn slip road beneath Canal Road flyover, Canal Road West and Hennessy Road;
– Traffic from Cross Harbour Tunnel heading for Happy Valley will be diverted via the down-ramp leading from southbound Canal Road flyover to Canal Road East, eastbound Leighton Road and Wong Nai Chung Road;
– Traffic along southbound Morrison Hill Road will be diverted to turn left to eastbound Leighton Road;
– Traffic along southbound Morrison Hill Road heading for Happy Valley will be diverted via eastbound Leighton Road and Wong Nai Chung Road; and
– Traffic along westbound Leighton Road will be diverted to Wong Nai Chung Road.

C. Prohibition for learner drivers

     Learner drivers will be prohibited to turn left from Caroline Hill Road to Leighton Road between one and a half hours before the start of the first race and one hour after the last race. In addition, learner drivers will be prohibited from accessing the following roads within the above period of time: 

– Shan Kwong Road between Yik Yam Street and Wong Nai Chung Road;
– Village Road between its upper and lower junctions with Shan Kwong Road;
– Percival Street between Hennessy Road and Leighton Road;
– Canal Road East; and
– The service road leading from Gloucester Road to Canal Road flyover.

D. Suspension of parking spaces

     Parking spaces on southbound Wong Nai Chung Road between Sports Road and Blue Pool Road will be suspended from 11am to 7pm for day racing, and from 5pm to 11.59pm for night racing respectively. 

     All vehicles parked illegally during the implementation of the above special traffic arrangements will be towed away without prior warning, and may be subject to multiple ticketing.

Actual implementation of road closure and traffic diversion will be made by the Police at the time depending on traffic conditions in the areas. Motorists should exercise tolerance and patience, and follow the instructions of police officers on site.

Remarks by S for Health at media session on incident of errors in embryo biopsy specimens

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

Remarks by S for Health at media session on incident of errors in embryo biopsy specimens 
Reporter: Would the Government consider penalising Heal Fertility (Limited), given that it has not reported the case to the Department of Health within 24 hours? Why cannot the CUHK, when the case starts, notify the Council on Human Reproductive Technology, but they had to report to Heal Fertility (Limited) to report to the Council?
 
Secretary for Health: According to the Private Healthcare Facilities Ordinance (Cap. 633), day procedure centres have to report any serious untoward incidents within 24 hours. So in this particular incident, the centre has definitely breached this requirement, and the Department of Health has already requested the centre to provide a report within four weeks. Based on the report and further investigation findings, the Department of Health will consider any regulatory action for the breach of the Private Healthcare Facilities Ordinance.
 
Reporter: What measures would the Government implement to ensure timely reporting of these facilities in the future?
 
Secretary for Health: About the Private Healthcare Facilities Ordinance (Cap. 633), there is already a code of practice that these day procedure centres have to report serious untoward incidents within 24 hours. But for the part of the human reproductive technology, there is no definite time limit for reporting. Considering the fact that this is a little bit more complicated, the centre has decided to investigate further before reporting to the Council. Whether we need to put in a time frame for reporting, we will consider that after we have the full investigation report for this incident.
 
(Please also refer to the Chinese portion of the remarks.)
Issued at HKT 18:37

NNNN

LCSD and EDB co-organise Shaanxi-Henan study tour to enhance secondary teachers’ knowledge of Sui and Tang dynasties

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

LCSD and EDB co-organise Shaanxi-Henan study tour to enhance secondary teachers’ knowledge of Sui and Tang dynasties      
     ​These experiences not only help teachers integrate museum elements into their classrooms, thereby enriching their teaching methods and content, but also empower the schools to design more inspiring study tours for students in the future. Ultimately, this will promote heritage education and enrich Hong Kong students’ interest in learning Chinese history.Issued at HKT 18:42

NNNN

LCQ18: Occupational safety and health of air crew members

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

LCQ18: Occupational safety and health of air crew members 
Question:
 
     Some members of the sector have relayed that, air crew members are required to deal with a wide range of unforeseen incidents while providing in-flight services, including verbal disputes between passengers, physical confrontations, various security incidents and breaches of regulations, and requests for medical assistance. This, combined with the need to work long-term day and night shifts, meet high service standards and work in confined spaces, places additional psychological strain on air crew members. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
 
(1) whether it knows the respective numbers of unforeseen incidents that occurred in the passenger cabin on flights departing from or arriving in Hong Kong over the past three years (broken down by type of incident); of the reporting mechanism in place;
 
(2) whether the Civil Aviation Department has provided local airlines with guidelines or mechanisms for air crew members to handle unforeseen incidents in the passenger cabin; if so, of the details and the review cycle;
 
(3) whether it knows if local airlines currently provide adequate mental health counselling and support for their air crew members; if so, of the details; and
 
(4) given the geopolitical tensions in recent years, should war or other emergencies occur at a flight’s destination, forcing the air crew members to remain stranded there, whether the HKSAR Government will require local airlines to establish overseas emergency support teams for the crew or put in place contingency mechanisms to maintain close contact with them and provide appropriate support, thereby ensuring their personal safety?
 
Reply:
 
President,
 
     The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) has promulgated stringent standards on aviation safety. As the regulator of civil aviation affairs, the Civil Aviation Department (CAD) has been comprehensively regulating the operations of local airlines in accordance with the requirements of the ICAO and the Air Navigation (Hong Kong) Order 1995 (Cap. 448C) through the established regulatory regime and monitoring mechanism. Local airlines are subject to strict scrutiny by the CAD on a routine basis (including conducting flight inspections and operational records inspections, and also requiring local airlines to effectively implement safety management systems and formulate policies and procedures relating to risk assessment and emergency response mechanisms) to ensure that flight operations comply with airworthiness and safety standards, thereby ensuring aviation safety. At the same time, airlines are also required to implement aviation security measures in accordance with the Aviation Security Ordinance (Cap. 494), its subsidiary legislation, and the Hong Kong Aviation Security Programme. This includes formulating corresponding procedures and arrangements for handling in-flight security incidents, unruly passengers, and other situations that may affect aviation security, with a view to ensuring aviation security.
 
     In consultation with the Security Bureau and the Labour Department (LD), the reply to the Member’s question is as follows:

(1) and (2) According to the standards and recommended practices of the ICAO, airlines are required to formulate standard operating procedures that comply with cabin safety guidelines to handle various in-flight incidents relating to aviation safety or aviation security. In addition, pursuant to Article 86 of the Air Navigation (Hong Kong) Order 1995, the CAD requires all local airlines to report incidents involving aviation safety to the CAD under the Mandatory Occurrence Reporting (MOR) Scheme. Upon receipt of relevant reports, the CAD will conduct a review and, where necessary, conduct investigations with the airlines and assess the investigation results. For aviation security incidents, airlines must report to the CAD in accordance with section 20 of the Aviation Security Regulation (Cap. 494A). Upon receipt of the relevant reports, the CAD will also conduct a review and follow up with the airlines as appropriate if necessary. 

Year     The reports involving cabin safety received under the MOR Scheme pursuant to Article 86 of the Air Navigation (Hong Kong) Order 1995 mainly include cases of passengers and crew members feeling unwell, as well as medical needs due to injuries caused by turbulences; as for the unforeseen security incidents in cabins received through the reporting mechanism under the scope of section 20 of the Aviation Security Regulation, they mainly include assault and other disorderly conduct. With the increase in the number of flights in recent years, the number of reports of various incidents in 2025 has increased compared to previous years.

(3) It is understood that local airlines have generally adopted various measures to support the mental health of their employees (including crew members), such as signing the Mental Health Workplace Charter, organising promotional activities, and providing employee support groups and hotlines. Furthermore, to enhance the awareness and capacity of employers and employees in managing work stress and mental health issues, the LD and the Occupational Safety and Health Council (OSHC) organise occupational health talks and publicity activities related to work stress and mental health from time to time. The LD and OSHC also have published publications on work stress management to provide practical ways for managing work stress and preventing mental health issues at personal and organisational levels. In addition, the LD has been collaborating with the Department of Health (DH) and OSHC to jointly organise the Joyful@Healthy Workplace programme for many years. This initiative encourages employers and employees to work together to create a positive work environment, promoting healthy eating, physical activity, and stress management. To further enhance employers’ and employees’ awareness of mental health, the DH, LD and OSHC have also launched the Mental Health Workplace Charter together.
 
(4) With full support from the Office of the Commissioner of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and the Chinese diplomatic and consular missions, the Assistance to Hong Kong Residents Unit of the Immigration Department (ImmD) has all along been striving to provide Hong Kong residents in distress outside Hong Kong, including crew members, with all practicable assistance.Issued at HKT 12:00

NNNN

LCQ12: Strategies and measures for developing visitor sources

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region – 4

Following is a question by the Hon Yiu Pak-leung and a written reply by the Secretary for Transport and Logistics, Ms Mable Chan, in the Legislative Council today (July 8):

Question: 

There are views suggesting that the successive completion and commissioning of the Three-runway System and Terminal 2 at the Hong Kong International Airport (HKIA), coupled with the steady implementation of the Southbound Travel for Guangdong Vehicles (STGV) policy, has brought major development opportunities to Hong Kong’s tourism industry. The Government must seize the aforesaid opportunities to enhance the layout of the air route network, develop a diversified portfolio of visitor source markets and strive to attract more transfer and transit passengers to stay in Hong Kong. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:

(1) of the total number of passengers handled by HKIA in 2018 and in each year from 2023 up to the second quarter of 2026; and among them, of the respective numbers of local passengers, Mainland passengers, passengers from other places, and passengers transferring and transiting through Hong Kong, with a tabulated breakdown of the above figures;

(2) as the Chief Executive proposed in the 2024 Policy Address to support HKIA to explore new destinations and flights, particularly to enhance co-operation with civil aviation counterparts from Belt and Road countries, of the new direct-flight destinations introduced by Hong Kong and the respective numbers of weekly flights to and from such destinations during the period from 2025 to June 2026;

(3) as the Chief Executive proposed in the 2025 Policy Address that the Government would forge more new air services agreements and expand traffic rights with South America, Central Asia, Africa, the Middle East, etc, as the priority target regions, whether the authorities have any plans to join hands with airlines, hotels, the tourism industry, etc in formulating external publicity strategies targeting the aforesaid new visitor source markets and launching products that appeal to visitors from those markets; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that;

(4) as the Government has increased the Air Passenger Departure Tax (APDT) from $120 to $200 per passenger with effect from October 1, ‍2025 and extended the scope of passengers exempted from APDT payment, of the APDT revenue and the number of passengers exempted from APDT payment since that date, with the figures set out by month;

(5) given the progressive increase in the volume of passengers transferring and transiting at HKIA and their proportion in the overall passenger throughput of HKIA, apart from the Airport Authority Hong Kong, whether the Government has launched any specific publicity plans, or what such plans it will launch in the future, to proactively promote the latest scope of APDT exemption to other places and roll out tourism products dedicated to passengers transferring and transiting at HKIA; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that; and

(6) as the expansion arrangements of STGV announced by the Guangdong and Hong Kong Governments on June 8, ‍2026 are expected to attract more high-spending consumer groups from cities in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area to use HKIA in Hong Kong, whether the Government has any plans to formulate dedicated publicity strategies for users of STGV, “Park ‍& ‍Fly” and “Park ‍& ‍Visit”, and to join hands with the tourism, retail and catering sectors in launching targeted tourism products with local characteristics; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that?

Reply:
 
President,
 
The Government has always been committed to promoting the development of the aviation and tourism industries, and has implemented various measures to attract and facilitate passengers from around the world and the Chinese Mainland to visit Hong Kong via Hong Kong International Airport (HKIA), thereby promoting local economic development. In consultation with the Culture, Sports and Tourism Bureau, the Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau and the Airport Authority Hong Kong (AAHK), our reply to the question is as follows:

(1) According to the statistics provided by the AAHK, the distribution of passenger at HKIA in 2018 and from 2023 to the second quarter of 2026, is tabulated below:

Year Passenger volume (million passenger trips)
Arrival/departure passengers Transfer and transit passengers Total passenger volume
Local passengers Mainland passengers Other passengers
2018 23.7 12.1 18.3 20.5 74.7
2023 17.7 5.3 8.4 8.0 39.5
2024 21.5 7.3 12.8 11.4 53.0
2025 21.9 8.0 14.8 16.3 61.0
2026 (Jan-May) (Note) 8.6 3.7 6.5 8.8 27.7

Note: The figures are provisional and subject to confirmation by airlines.
 
(2) and (3) The Government has all along been working closely with the AAHK to strategically attract airlines to add new destinations and increase flight frequencies through outreach teams, incentive schemes and policy facilitation measures. For example, the AAHK launched the Air Network Development Programme in June 2024, which provides financial incentives to encourage airlines to launch new routes and increase flight frequencies on existing routes. As at end of May 2026, the Programme has attracted 40 airlines to launch 89 new routes covering Asia, Europe, North America and Africa, as well as to increase flight frequencies on 14 existing routes.
 
HKIA currently serves a total of 223 destinations. From 2025 to date, HKIA has added a total of 43 new destinations (including those in Chinese Mainland, Pakistan, Japan, Indonesia, India, Laos, Greece, Latvia, Korea, Kazakhstan, Cambodia, Norway, Malaysia, Czechia, Serbia, Italy, Germany, Australia, and Romania). These destinations are served by a total of 96 weekly scheduled passenger and cargo flights, as well as non-scheduled passenger and cargo flights or charter services.
 
To attract non-local airlines (in particular those from regions such as South America, Central Asia, Africa and the Middle East) to resume and/or launch new routes, the AAHK has engaged with various airlines to explore the possibility of resuming and/or launching new routes. Among these efforts, Etihad Airways resumed its Hong Kong-Abu Dhabi service in November 2025. Additionally, Delta Air Lines recently resumed its direct flight services to Los Angeles after an eight-year hiatus. Furthermore, the AAHK earlier signed a Memorandum of Understanding with Fly Khiva Group of Uzbekistan, under which both sides agreed to strengthen exchanges and co-operation in areas such as developing a comprehensive passenger and cargo air transport network, enhancing operational and service standards, sustainable development and talent training.
 
(4) The Air Passenger Departure Tax (APDT) has been increased from $120 per passenger to $200 with effect from October 1, 2025. The new tax rate is applicable to air tickets purchased on or after that date, and the scope of exemption has been extended to passengers who arrive and depart Hong Kong by air on the same or following calendar day; and passengers who arrive Hong Kong by other means through immigration control and depart from Hong Kong by air on the same or following calendar day.
 
Following the implementation of the abovementioned new measures, the monthly figures for APDT revenue and the number of passengers exempted from APDT (as at April 30, 2026) are as follows:
 

Month APDT Revenue (Note 1)
($hundred million)
Number of passengers exempted from APDT (Note 2)
(‘000)
October 2025 2.17 920
November 2025 2.26 860
December 2025 2.94 980
January 2026 2.99 1 030
February 2026 3.04 1 090
March 2026 3.14 1 130
April 2026 3.66 1 120
Total 20.20 7 130

Note 1: The administrative fees paid to the airlines and helicopter company (operators) has been deducted from the amount.

Note 2: The figures include eligible airline passengers who have been automatically exempted by the operators’ ticketing system, as well as passengers who had submitted applications through the APDT refund platform and were granted the exemptions. Passengers who were eligible for exemption but did not apply for a refund have not been included.
 
(5) As a regional tourism and aviation hub, Hong Kong sees many visitors transiting through the city each year. With the enhanced visa arrangements for inbound visitors launched by the Chinese Mainland, the Hong Kong Tourism Board (HKTB) will fully leverage Hong Kong’s role as a “super connector” linking the Chinese Mainland and overseas markets to strategically explore more business opportunities.

     The HKTB has consolidated information on various tourism products for inbound, outbound, and transit visitors on its one-stop travel information platform Discover Hong Kong, which provides itinerary planning and travel route guides for brief stopovers in Hong Kong. These guides cover dining, retail, attractions, culture and citywalks, etc, encouraging visitors to seize the opportunity to explore Hong Kong before departure and enhancing the travel experience of transit passengers during their stay. Meanwhile, the HKTB collaborates with the trade to launch promotional travel packages tailored for high-potential markets, featuring special offers on airlines, hotels, dining, attractions and transport, so as to further strengthen Hong Kong’s competitiveness as a transit hub.

(6) The Governments of Guangdong and Hong Kong have expanded Southbound Travel for Guangdong Vehicles (Southbound Travel Scheme) since mid-2026 from the initial four applicable cities to all nine Chinese Mainland cities within the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA); increased the daily travel booking quota of entry into urban area from 100 vehicles to 200 vehicles; and introduced the “Park & Visit” service to allow Guangdong travellers to park their vehicles and enter Hong Kong via the passenger clearance building at the Hong Kong Port of the Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge.

In tandem with the expansion of the Southbound Travel Scheme, the Government has been encouraging the hotel, tourism and retail sectors to offer promotional packages covering shopping, parking and accommodation for self-drive travellers entering urban area, which in turn attract travellers under the Southbound Travel Scheme, especially travellers staying overnight and family travellers, to stay for spending and sightseeing in various districts in Hong Kong. In addition, the AAHK has stepped up its publicity efforts targeting travellers from the GBA. As regards the “Park & Fly” service, since its launch, the AAHK has collaborated with Chinese Mainland travel platforms, car owners’ associations and airlines to promote the service and related user guides through social media, key opinion leaders, and interviews by Chinese Mainland media. As regards the forthcoming “Park & Visit” service, the AAHK will continue to adopt the aforementioned promotional approach, and will explore joint promotional initiatives with its business partners in Lantau, with a view to attracting GBA travellers to drive into Hong Kong, visit different attractions and communities after arrival, and thereby promote the development of local tourism, retail and catering sectors.

LCQ3: Sustainable development of public museums

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

LCQ3: Sustainable development of public museums 
Question:
 
     There are views that on the premise of not affecting public services, public museums should proactively expand diversified revenue channels. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
 
(1) whether it has compiled statistics on the (i) income, (ii) expenditure, (iii) total attendance, and (iv) average facility utilisation rate of all museums under the Leisure and Cultural Services Department (LCSD) and the West Kowloon Cultural District (WKCD) Authority respectively in each of the past five years;
 
(2) of the respective annual remuneration of the top five senior management personnel of the Hong Kong Palace Museum and M+ since the official commencement of operations; moreover, as it is reported that over 10 self-service donation kiosks will be installed at various venues across the WKCD starting from the 1st of this month to encourage members of the public to support the development of arts and culture, whether it knows the expenditure on purchasing such donation kiosks, the estimated maintenance costs, and the estimated amount of donations to be received in the next three years; and
 
(3) of the latest progress, costs involved and expected economic gains of the authorities’ introduction of market-based business models into museums under the LCSD; whether there are plans to promote collaborations between museums under the LCSD and private enterprises for strategic brand crossovers and franchising, so as to develop more diversified revenue sources?
 
Reply:
 
President,
 
     Museums play a vital role in cultural inheritance and social education. The Government continuously reviews the development and future plans of the 15 museums under the Leisure and Cultural Services Department (LCSD), in order to meet the general public’s need for museums and art appreciation. Meanwhile, to promote the diverse development of Hong Kong’s local cultural ecosystem, the Government drives the development of the West Kowloon Cultural District (WKCD) project, providing the West Kowloon Cultural District Authority (WKCDA) with a one-off upfront endowment of $21.6 billion and the development rights of the land within the WKCD for constructing and operating the WKCD project on a self-financing basis.
      
     My reply to the question raised by the Hon Chan Pui-leung is as follows:
 
(1) The public mission of museums under the LCSD is to preserve and promote tangible and intangible cultural heritage. In addition to organising exhibitions on various subjects, such as visual arts, history, culture, science and technology, the museums also actively provide broad access to cultural education and services (such as lectures, demonstrations, workshops and roving exhibitions). Since August 2016, with the approval of the Legislative Council, the Government has been offering free admission to permanent exhibitions of museums, while charging a modest admission fee for the permanent exhibitions of the Hong Kong Science Museum and the Hong Kong Space Museum to meet their operational needs. This arrangement is in line with the practice adopted by public museums in the Chinese Mainland, where permanent exhibitions are generally open to the public free of charge. Although LCSD museums are not operated primarily for profit, they actively generate revenue from various sources, including tickets sales for film screenings, licence fees from shops and cafes, rental charges for hiring facilities, and sales of cultural and creative products.
 
     As for the WKCD, both M+ and the Hong Kong Palace Museum have proactively expanded their revenue streams. A number of exhibitions and cultural and creative products of the two museums have been well-received by the public. Currently, admission income, sponsorships, and commercial revenue (including venue hiring, cultural and creative products), each accounts for about one-third of the total income. The combined income of the two museums in 2025-26 increased by more than 20 per cent compared to the previous year.
      
     Detailed data of the museums under the LCSD and the WKCDA are set out in Annex I.
 
(2) There are a total of seven senior executives in the two museums of the WKCD, with the total remuneration expenditure amounting to approximately $20.9 million in 2025-26. When determining the pay adjustment, the WKCDA takes into account multiple factors, including Hong Kong’s market pay and economic conditions, the staff turnover rate and financial position of the Authority, and the work performances and existing pay positions of the executives. Please refer to Annex II for details.
 
     Fundraising income is one of the most important income sources of the WKCD and accounts for about one-third of the overall recurrent operating income. In 2025-26, the fundraising income of the WKCDA reached $219 million, representing an increase of over 30 per cent compared to the previous financial year. The WKCDA draws on the experience of overseas cultural institutions in attracting individual donations, and installed self-service donation kiosks in the museums, performing arts venues and other venues in the WKCD since July 1 this year, to facilitate the public to support the WKCD in promoting arts and culture development. There is no additional cost implication to the WKCDA, as the self-service donations kiosks are developed and manufactured by a technology company which will also cover the operating expenses. The objective of the WKCDA is to foster public support and participation in the development of arts and culture, and the self-service donation kiosks primarily solicit small donations which are not expected to account for a substantial proportion of the overall fundraising income.
 
(3) The 2025 Policy Address has announced that the LCSD will introduce market-based business models in designated facilities to provide more diverse value-added activities. These include leasing out museums on their closing days for commercial or private use and opening up more venues for hire. In this connection, the LCSD invited the submission of Expressions of Interest (EOIs) in end 2025 regarding the introduction of a market-oriented operation model at relevant facilities. A total of 14 EOIs were received. The respondents included organisations engaged in event or advertising planning, as well as property development companies, among which a number of concepts and proposals were of reference value. The LCSD increased the number of venues available for hire in the tender in response to the suggestions made in the EOIs and invited tenders in April 2026 for introducing market-based business models at 26 designated LCSD facilities, such as the Hong Kong Museum of Art and the Hong Kong Science Museum. It is anticipated that operators will be appointed by the end of 2026. The associated revenue and costs will be subject to the monthly fee levels proposed by the successful bidders, and the actual expenses involved in the activities. Following the implementation of the initiative, the LCSD will continuously assess its economic benefits.
 
     The LCSD has all along welcomed crossover collaborations with corporations and commercial brands, aiming to leverage their branding impact to promote museum activities and programme. Crossover products previously launched through collaborations between the LCSD museums and commercial brands include phone cases, food products, and brick sets. Looking forward, the LCSD will continue to explore more collaborative initiatives under market-based business models. Thank you, President.
Issued at HKT 14:09

NNNN