Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region
LCQ9: Promoting pet inclusivity and enhancing animal protection
Question:
As regards promoting pet inclusivity and enhancing animal protection, will the Government inform this Council:
(1) whether it has compiled statistics on the number of households keeping pets, as well as the respective numbers of dogs and cats which have been microchipped and licensed, in Hong Kong;
(2) whether it has assessed the effectiveness of the Government’s promotion of public education on pet inclusivity (such as responsible pet ownership and prevention of cruelty to animals) in the past two years; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that;
(3) given that the Food Business Regulation (Cap. 132X) currently prohibits dogs (except guide dogs) from entering food premises, and it is learnt that some shopping malls have successively allowed pets to enter their areas in recent years, whether the Government will consider implementing a pilot scheme to allow dogs to enter the food premises of such shopping malls, so as to provide actual experience and data for the purposes of reviewing the existing legislation and considering the relaxation of the restriction on the entry of dogs into food premises; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that;
(4) as it is learnt that operators of some public transport services may decide at their discretion whether to allow passengers to board with pets, whether the Government will consider further relaxing the restriction to allow passengers to bring along their pets to use all public transport services, and formulating standard guidelines;
(5) of the number of cases received by the Government in each of the past three years involving the fatal poisoning of dogs; among such cases, (i) the number of cases in which the suspects were successfully arrested, (ii) the penalties imposed on the convicted persons, and (iii) the number of cases involving public facilities under the Leisure and Cultural Services Department; how the authorities will follow up cases of fatal poisoning of dogs, including whether they will consider installing cameras at the relevant locations to step up monitoring; and
(6) as it has been reported that many cases of fatal poisoning of dogs are suspected of involving the use of pesticides such as rodenticides, whether the Government will consider amending the legislation to require members of the public to register their real names with the Government when purchasing pesticides, so as to prevent pesticides from being abused to poison and kill animals?
Reply:
President,
Having consulted the Security Bureau, the Transport and Logistics Bureau and the Leisure and Cultural Services Department (LCSD), the reply to the question from the Hon Stanley Li is as follows:
(1) According to the most recent Thematic Household Survey on the household keeping of dogs and cats conducted by the Census and Statistics Department in 2018, some 241 900 households in Hong Kong were keeping cats or dogs, representing 9.4 per cent of all households. A total of some 184 100 cats and 221 100 dogs were being kept.
Under the Rabies Regulation (Cap. 421A), the keeper of a dog shall arrange his dog over the age of five months to be implanted with microchip and licensed. As at 2024, the number of dogs implanted with microchip and licensed was 158 663.
Since the transmission of rabies through cats is relatively lower than that through dogs, the legislation does not require that cats shall be implanted with a microchip and licensed. To facilitate identification of owners and assist owners to find their cats that have gone astray, since April 2024, the Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department (AFCD) has stipulated the Licence Conditions that cats put up for sale by animal traders should be obtained from approved sources and microchipped. The AFCD does not maintain the number of cats implanted with microchip.
(2) The AFCD continues to promote the messages on animal welfare and responsible pet ownership through public education and publicity programmes, which include producing television promotional videos, establishing a thematic website on animal welfare and “Be a Responsible Pet Owner”, organising seminars in schools and residential estates, roving exhibitions, dog training courses, and pet adoption days, etc. The Department has also launched a series of “Duty of Care” publicity programmes, which include the production of a series of posts on social media platforms to share information on how to take proper care of animals and enhance the public’s understanding of the content and importance of “Duty of Care”. The AFCD includes questionnaires in some of its activities to evaluate their effectiveness, and the majority of participants have provided positive feedback. The Pet Adoption Day held in 2024 attracted over 10 000 attendees, demonstrating that the event was well received by the public.
To enlist wider public support and participation in fighting against cruelty to animals, the Hong Kong Police Force (HKPF) has implemented the Animal Watchers Programme (the Programme) since 2021 with a view to agglomerating the strengths of animal lovers at the community level in four directions of education, publicity, intelligence-gathering and investigation, raising public awareness on prevention of cruelty to animals, encouraging the public to report in a timely manner as well as providing information and clues useful for investigations. The Programme covers large-scale activities across Hong Kong for different communities and age groups, through the “Animal CARE Corners”, encouraging schools to keep animals and enhance students’ pet care skills. The Police adopts a multifaceted approach in evaluating its effectiveness by a variety of indicators, including the numbers of cases reported and persons arrested as well as the level of overall public engagement. At present, most of the cases of cruelty to animals are reported by members of the public who voluntarily offer information for investigation. This shows that the Programme has a significant impact on enhancing police-community co-operation and raising public awareness of combatting cruelty to animals.
(3) Society is divided on whether to allow pet dogs to enter food premises. The Government needs to take into account different factors when examining the relevant legislation, including public health, operating environment of food premises, and social acceptance. In particular, food premises in Hong Kong are generally cramped. It is necessary to consider the reaction of pet dogs in a crowded and cramped environment (possibly with different types of dogs), as well as the potential impact on other diners. The Environment and Ecology Bureau, together with the Food and Environmental Hygiene Department, is conducting research on practices and experiences in other places, and will carefully consider whether there is room for relaxing the relevant restrictions.
(4) Generally speaking, public transport has high daily patronage and limited compartment spaces. When considering whether to allow passengers to travel with pets for public transport services, the operators shall consider and balance different factors, including the actual operating situation, space and carrying capacity of the compartments, reaction of the pets in the travelling environment, as well as the potential impact on other passengers. The actual circumstances of different public transport modes vary. The Government will maintain close communication with the public transport operators and remind them to listen to different views to ensure that their services can properly cater for and balance the needs of different passengers. Currently, some public transport operators, such as ferries and taxis, may decide at their discretion whether to allow passengers to board with pets. The MTR Corporation Limited will also implement a pilot scheme that allows passengers to bring along their pet cats and dogs to take the light rail in accordance with specific requirements and at specific periods.
(5) Poisoning an animal causing unnecessary suffering is an offence under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Ordinance (Cap. 169). From 2022 to 2024, the number of reports on suspected cruelty to animals received by the HKPF and the AFCD, the number of persons arrested, and the relevant penalties imposed are tabulated at Annex. The Government does not maintain relevant breakdown of information on animal poisoning cases.
The Police will continue to review locations across 18 districts with higher crime rate and greater pedestrian flow, and proportionally install CCTV in these areas with a view to combating crime. Moreover, the LCSD will review and adjust the number of CCTV cameras having regard to established guidelines and the actual security and operational needs of individual venue. In the event of suspected criminal activities, the LCSD will contact the Police and take appropriate follow-up actions in light of the actual circumstances.
(6) Currently, the Pesticides Regulations (Cap. 133A) requires that all pesticide products must carry clear labels in both Chinese and English before being supplied or sold by licensed dealers. Any person using registered pesticides should thoroughly read and follow the instructions at the labels, and take all safety measures to protect the safety of the user and the public.
To enhance public understanding of the safe use of pesticides, the AFCD has distributed and uploaded relevant leaflets and guidelines for the reference of the trades and the public, and has actively disseminated messages of proper use of pesticides through various ongoing education and publicity programmes, including reminding members of the public that they should exercise caution in the purchase and use of pesticides and follow the relevant safety guidelines, so as to minimise the potential risks to human health, animal welfare and the environment. Considering that real-name registration for the purchase of pesticides would cause inconvenience to members of the public in their daily purchases of these products, and that it is difficult for law enforcement officers to identify persons with the intention to poison animals through registration records of the purchasers, the introduction of a real-name registration scheme would not be particularly effective for the prevention of animal poisoning.
Issued at HKT 14:35
NNNN
LCQ6: Measures to attract inward investment
Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region
Following is a question by Dr the Hon Kennedy Wong and a written reply by the Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury, Mr Christopher Hui, in the Legislative Council today (April 16):
Question:
Regarding measures to attract inward investment, will the Government inform this Council:
(1) of the respective numbers of applications received, approved and rejected by the authorities under the New Capital Investment Entrant Scheme (New CIES) since its enhancement measures took effect on the first of last month, together with a breakdown by the applicants’ place of domicile and total investment amount; and the reasons for rejecting applications under New CIES;
(2) whether it has compiled statistics on, among the approved applications mentioned in (1), the number of successful applicants who have already made investments in Hong Kong; whether it has assessed the effectiveness of the enhancement measures for New CIES in promoting the development of family offices in Hong Kong;
(3) as it has been reported that the delegation of Hong Kong deputies to the National People’s Congress has proposed to establish a dedicated remittance mechanism called “Property Purchase Capital Connect” to allow residents of the Mainland and Hong Kong to make cross-boundary remittances for purchasing properties in Hong Kong or on the Mainland, with a view to further facilitating the flow of talents and economic integration between the two places, whether the authorities will look into this proposal and communicate with the relevant Mainland authorities in this regard; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that;
(4) as it has been reported that even though the policies adopted by some countries to combat investment immigrants’ money laundering are more stringent compared to Hong Kong, such money laundering still exists in those countries, how the authorities strike a balance between anti-money laundering on the one hand and facilitating the entry of and attracting investment immigrants to Hong Kong on the other; and
(5) as it is learnt that while persons who have been granted visas under New CIES may apply to become Hong Kong permanent residents after meeting the relevant requirements and having resided in Hong Kong continuously for seven years, there is no such arrangement for the major asset managers of family office who have also come to Hong Kong for investment, whether the authorities will consider putting in place an identical arrangement for the aforesaid major asset managers with reference to New CIES; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that?
Reply:
President,
In consultation with the Hong Kong Monetary Authority, the Immigration Department (ImmD) and Invest Hong Kong (InvestHK), the reply to various parts of the question is as follows:
(1) and (2) Since the implementation of the enhancement measures for the New Capital Investment Entrant Scheme (the Scheme) from March 1, 2025 up to end-March, a total of 174 applications have been received. The applications are being processed and no application has been rejected so far. Under the Scheme, applicants must invest a minimum of HK$30 million in the permissible investment assets. If all the aforementioned applications are approved, it is estimated that they will bring more than HK$5.2 billion to Hong Kong. Besides, since the Scheme opened for application from March 2024, a total of 1 092 applications have been received, having a positive impact on attracting more new capital to Hong Kong and strengthening the development of our asset and wealth management business, financial services and related professional services.
In accordance with the application procedures under the Scheme, after InvestHK has verified that the applicant fulfills the net asset requirement, he/she may submit to the ImmD an entry application for a visa/entry permit to enter Hong Kong for residence (entry application). Upon “approval-in-principle” after assessment from the immigration perspectives, the ImmD will grant a visa/entry permit to the applicant for entering Hong Kong as a visitor for not more than 180 days for making the committed investment within the period. Among the 174 applications received in March, InvestHK has approved 99 applications for Net Asset Assessment, and the ImmD has received 65 entry applications. The ImmD will generally complete the assessment of “approval-in-principle” in around three weeks, upon receipt of all needed documents. Since no application has been granted “approval-in-principle” so far, applicants have yet to commence their investments in Hong Kong. The detailed breakdown of the 65 entry applications received by the ImmD is set out in the table below:
| Entry applications received by the ImmD | |
| Guinea-Bissau | 41 |
| Vanuatu | 15 |
| Hungary | 2 |
| New Zealand | 2 |
| Australia | 1 |
| Canada | 1 |
| France | 1 |
| Greece | 1 |
| Malta | 1 |
| Total | 65 |
Since the enhancement measures under the Scheme have only been implemented for a short period of time, the Government will continuously review the applicants’ investment arrangement and suitably evaluate its effectiveness.
(3) The Government has maintained communication with financial regulatory authorities in the Mainland on various cross-boundary remittance arrangements to seek to provide more facilitation arrangements for the convenience and benefit of the public and the business sector while ensuring that the risks are manageable. On facilitation for cross-boundary property purchases, the facilitative payment arrangement for Hong Kong and Macao residents purchasing properties in the Mainland cities of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA), announced in January 2024, has been implemented. This arrangement applies to both newly built and second-hand residential properties purchased by individual Hong Kong and Macao residents, and allows them to remit funds in Renminbi or foreign currencies from outside the Mainland for property purchases and repayment of mortgage loans in the Mainland following the relevant procedures for settlement and payment.
For cross-boundary remittance arrangements (including that for property purchases) for Mainland residents or Mainland talents admitted to Hong Kong, since it involves different regulatory regimes (including requirements for capital inflows and outflows), the Government has been, with regard to their practical needs, exploring facilitation arrangements with the Mainland authorities concerned, with an aim to explore a gradual approach for seeking suitable policies and solutions through close collaboration between the two places within their regulatory framework and existing practices. Any facilitation arrangements will be announced in due course.
(4) Under the Scheme, an applicant is required to appoint eligible financial intermediary(ies) to manage the permissible investments in his/her designated account(s). The appointed financial intermediary(ies) is/are required to carry out customer due diligence and fulfill relevant anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing obligations under the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter Terrorist Financing Ordinance (Cap. 615), and report to InvestHK on the applicant’s continuous compliance with the Scheme Rules. When processing the applications for Assessment on Investment Requirements, InvestHK will also check the fund flow and investment arrangement of the applicant, and examine contract notes/reference letters, etc as provided by the applicant or issued by the appointed financial intermediary(ies). If necessary, InvestHK will also request the applicant to provide other supporting documents and information to certify that the applicant’s investment complies with the requirements of the Scheme.
(5) Since the enhancement measures to the Scheme effected in March 2025, applicants may make investments through eligible family-owned investment holding vehicles or family-owned special purpose entities. The Government has included experienced management professionals in asset and wealth management under the Talent List to promote the development of Hong Kong as an asset and wealth management hub. Outside talents who meet the eligibility criteria for the relevant profession (including family office professionals and asset managers) may apply for entry under the Quality Migrant Admission Scheme, the General Employment Policy or the Admission Scheme for Mainland Talents and Professionals. Persons admitted under the above various talent admission schemes who have ordinarily resided in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) for a continuous period of not less than seven years may apply for the right of abode in the HKSAR in accordance with the law.
LCQ5: Work on attracting enterprises and investments
Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region
Following is a question by the Hon Sunny Tan and a written reply by the Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development, Mr Algernon Yau, in the Legislative Council today (April 16):
Question:
There are views that the fruitful results of Invest Hong Kong (InvestHK) in attracting enterprises and investments last year demonstrate that overseas and Mainland enterprises have full confidence in Hong Kong. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
(1) as InvestHK indicated last year that it would first focus on attracting medium-sized Mainland enterprises that had needs to go global to invest in Hong Kong, and it has been reported that the number of micro, small and medium-enterprises on the Mainland exceeds 52 million, of the authorities’ deployment for the aforesaid work;
(2) as it has been reported that some enterprises face problems in aspects such as talents, supporting resources and financing in Hong Kong when establishing presence in Hong Kong, and the Secretary for Innovation, Technology and Industry has pointed out the need for the entire Government to be involved in resolving such problems, whether the authorities have conducted an in-depth study on the problems and difficulties encountered by Mainland enterprises when establishing presence in Hong Kong; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that;
(3) as the 2024 Policy Address proposes that InvestHK and the Hong Kong Trade Development Council will set up a mechanism to provide one-stop, diversified professional advisory services for enterprises in Hong Kong looking to go global, whether the authorities have conducted a comparative analysis of the effectiveness of Mainland enterprises venturing overseas markets directly vis-a-vis doing so through Hong Kong, so as to grasp Hong Kong’s advantages; and
(4) whether it will consider identifying the problems faced by Mainland enterprises venturing overseas markets when establishing presence in Hong Kong, and strengthening cross-departmental collaboration among various policy bureaux and government departments having regard to the needs of enterprises in terms of products, production, talents, as well as financial, legal, dispute resolution and other professional services relating to venturing overseas markets, so as to formulate targeted relief policies and helping measures, such as providing more targeted talent and fund matching services; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that?
Reply:
President,
According to the latest annual survey jointly conducted by Invest Hong Kong (InvestHK) and the Census and Statistics Department, the number of companies in Hong Kong with overseas or Mainland parent companies rose to 9 960 in 2024, reaching a record high. The number of start-ups in Hong Kong also increased to a record high of almost 4 700 in the same year.
In 2024, InvestHK assisted 539 Mainland or overseas enterprises in establishing and expanding their businesses in Hong Kong, representing an increase of over 40 per cent as compared with the full year figure of 2023. On a pro-rata basis, the figure well exceeded the performance indicator as set out in the 2022 Policy Address by the Chief Executive. Among those 539 companies, 273 of them were from the Mainland.
The above fruitful investment promotion results fully demonstrate InvestHK’s work achievements and that Mainland and overseas enterprises continue to have full confidence in Hong Kong despite geopolitical impact. Those enterprises have selected Hong Kong as their base to expand regional businesses in Asia so as to leverage the commercial values that Hong Kong could offer as a “super connector” and a “super value-adder” when assisting their global business expansion.
In response to the Hon Sunny Tan’s question, our reply is as follows:
The global trade landscape and geopolitics are rapidly changing, with parts of the supply chains shifting to the Global South and Belt and Road countries, while Mainland enterprises are also proactively establishing their presence abroad. According to statistics, there are currently more than 50 000 medium-sized manufacturing enterprises in the Pearl River Delta and the Yangtze River Delta alone, many of which involve overseas operations and have the need to go global with some of their manufacturing processes. Hong Kong’s rich experience in international trade and world-class professional services will be of assistance to such enterprises in seizing business opportunities when they plan to cope with the aforesaid changes.
It was announced in the 2024-25 Budget that the Government’s goal was to develop Hong Kong into a multinational supply chain management centre. In his 2024 Policy Address, the Chief Executive further requested InvestHK and the Hong Kong Trade Development Council (HKTDC) to set up a high value-added supply chain services mechanism for attracting Mainland enterprises to establish international or regional headquarters in Hong Kong for managing offshore trading and supply chain, and providing one-stop professional advisory services for enterprises in Hong Kong looking to go global. In December 2024, InvestHK and the HKTDC established the above mechanism. The two agencies are also proactively collaborating with relevant “Team Hong Kong” organisations, including the Hong Kong Export Credit Insurance Corporation (ECIC), the Hong Kong Productivity Council, etc., to jointly support those Mainland enterprises in Hong Kong to go global.
Despite that those Mainland enterprises would need to react to the United States’ tariffs imposed on different regions by re-constructing their supply chain networks, Hong Kong’s rich experience in international trade and world-class professional services allow it to become the destination for international or regional headquarters of those enterprises to manage offshore trading and supply chain. The enterprises could also leverage Hong Kong as a springboard for their multinational business development. On the one hand, through its Dedicated Teams for Attracting Businesses and Talents based in the Mainland Offices, InvestHK is proactively organising activities under the theme of multinational supply chain, so as to actively reach out to more Mainland enterprises for investment promotion work. As at end-February 2025, InvestHK had organised and co-organised around 20 relevant investment promotion activities in various Mainland cities, including Hangzhou, Nanjing and Xiamen, etc. within around one year’s time. InvestHK will identify Mainland enterprises wishing to go global through various activities and attract them to use Hong Kong as a platform for them to develop overseas businesses and establish supply chain.
On the other hand, the HKTDC is providing one-stop professional advisory services for enterprises in Hong Kong. Towards enterprises with plans of going global, the HKTDC will, through its overseas offices, render on-site support services. These include assisting enterprises in establishing connections with overseas markets and understanding overseas laws and regulations; providing market research covering various emerging markets such as the Middle East, Central Asia and Latin America; as well as providing information on various areas including environmental, social and governance (ESG), testing and certification and export credit risk management. Furthermore, in view that Hong Kong’s business sector possesses rich knowledge and profound experience in compliance, labour protection and environmental protection of overseas markets, the HKTDC facilitates collaboration between enterprises and different organisations and industry stakeholders to provide ESG training, etc. for Mainland enterprises seeking to expand their reach to overseas markets. This will help them build goodwill with business partners and expand their markets.
Besides, the ECIC will provide credit insurance for export services relating to multinational supply chain so as to render more comprehensive support for enterprises seeking to go global. To assist Hong Kong exporters in expanding into Mainland and emerging markets, the ECIC has also increased the number of free buyer credit checks from 12 to 20.
In fact, Hong Kong’s advantages for assisting Mainland enterprises to go global are very obvious and important. Apart from possessing quality talents who have rich experience in offshore trading and supply chain management and the relevant network, Hong Kong has the distinctive advantages of enjoying strong support of the motherland and being closely connected to the world, as well as plays the important roles as a “super connector” and a “super value-adder”, under “one country, two systems”. All these make Hong Kong a two-way springboard for Mainland enterprises to go global and for attracting overseas enterprises. Hong Kong’s institutional fundamentals, including the exercise of the common law system, independent Judiciary, a favourable business environment with efficient and transparent markets, a regulatory regime in line with international rules, a simple and low tax system, world-class professional services, and free flow of goods and factors of production including talents, capital and information, as well as key national strategies, including the National 14th Five-Year Plan, the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area development and the Belt and Road Initiative, provide Hong Kong with unlimited opportunities and make it the only economy in the world where the global advantage and the China advantage come together.
In addition, Hong Kong’s advantages and experiences especially meet the needs of small and medium enterprises from the Mainland (Mainland SMEs). Mainland SMEs’ demand for high value-added supply chain services is also consistent with InvestHK’s observations. During the past year, the Department noted at various investment promotion events that many Mainland SMEs had, upon understanding the aforementioned advantages of Hong Kong and the professional services it could offer, concurred that it would be far more effective and convenient for them to go global via Hong Kong instead of venturing overseas markets direct by themselves. They also expressed interest in establishing headquarters in Hong Kong for managing their offshore trading and supply chain. InvestHK and the HKTDC will provide these enterprises with one-stop supply chain advisory services and other relevant assistance through the high value-added supply chain services mechanism.
To further step up co-ordination between bureaux and departments, with the support of the Financial Secretary, InvestHK set up an inter-departmental/agency referral mechanism led by the Director-General of Investment Promotion last year. By proactively collecting Mainland and overseas enterprises’ concerns and pain points when they plan to establish presence in Hong Kong, InvestHK reflects them to relevant bureaux, departments or agencies accordingly for exploring suitable solutions as appropriate. Since the establishment of the mechanism more than half a year ago, various issues have been successfully addressed to meet the needs of the trade, including opening of bank accounts, application and work arrangements for imported workers, application for use of vacant land, thereby facilitating Mainland and overseas enterprises to set up and expand their businesses in Hong Kong.
Looking ahead, InvestHK will ride on the good momentum of 2024 and make every effort in attracting more Mainland and overseas enterprises to invest in Hong Kong, so as to continue to implement the performance indicator as set out in the 2022 Policy Address. At the same time, the Department will continue to work with relevant “Team Hong Kong” organisations to further enhance the high value-added supply chain services mechanism in order to attract and assist more Mainland enterprises looking to go global to come to Hong Kong and make good use of the city as a springboard to develop their multinational businesses. This will be conducive to Hong Kong’s economic development on the one hand, and facilitate the deepening of its international exchanges and co-operation on the other hand, thus responding to meet Premier Li Qiang’s expectations for Hong Kong, as set out in his work report this year, integrating into the overall national development while making contribution to the country.
In a first, ECI trains Booth Level Agents (BLAs) to strengthen grassroot participation by political parties
Source: Government of India
In a first, ECI trains Booth Level Agents (BLAs) to strengthen grassroot participation by political parties
Around 280 BLAs from Bihar of 10 recognised political parties take part in the 2-day training programme
Posted On: 16 APR 2025 1:17PM by PIB Delhi
The Election Commission of India (ECI) has commenced the training of Booth Level Agents (BLAs) from Bihar in view of the forthcoming elections in the State. Around 280 BLAs from the State associated with 10 recognised political parties are taking part in the 2-day training programme being organised at the India International Institute for Democracy and Election Management, IIIDEM, New Delhi.
Chief Election Commissioner Shri Gyanesh Kumar along with Election Commissioners Dr. Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Dr. Vivek Joshi addressed the BLAs in a first of its kind training programme. The training was conceptualised during the Chief Electoral Officers (CEO) conference held on the 4th of March, 2025. The Commission underscored the importance of BLAs in the election processes and asserted that the training programme would help them fulfil their responsibilities as delineated in the Representation of People act, 1950 and 1951, Registration of Elector Rules 1960, Conduct of Election Rules 1961 and the manuals, guidelines and instructions issued by ECI from time to time.
The BLAs were given an overview of their appointment, roles, and responsibilities as per the legal framework. The training programme familiarised them with various aspects of the election processes including the preparation, updation and revision of electoral rolls and the associated forms and formats associated. BLAs are appointed by recognised political parties and play an important role in ensuring error-free electoral rolls as per the provisions of the RP act, 1950. The BLAs were also trained in the use of the provision of first and second appeals under sections 24(a) and 24(b) of the RP Act 1950 in case they are aggrieved of the final electoral rolls as published.
******
PK/GDH/RP
(Release ID: 2122044) Visitor Counter : 14
INDIA- UZBEKISTAN JOINT MILITARY EXERCISE DUSTLIK-VI COMMENCES AT FOREIGN TRAINING NODE, AUNDH
Source: Government of India
Posted On: 16 APR 2025 2:39PM by PIB Delhi
The 6th edition of India- Uzbekistan Joint Military Exercise DUSTLIK-VI commenced today, at Foreign Training Node, Aundh (Pune). The Exercise is scheduled to be conducted from 16 to 28 Apr 2025.
Indian contingent comprising of 60 personnel is being represented by a Battalion of JAT Regiment and IAF. The Uzbekistan contingent is being represented by personnel from Uzbekistan Army. Joint Exercise DUSTLIK -VI is an annual training event conducted alternatively in India and Uzbekistan. Last edition was conducted in Termez District, Uzbekistan in April 2024.
The theme of the exercise will be based on the theme of Joint Multi Domain Sub Conventional operations in Semi-Urban Scenario. It will focus on responding to a terrorist action involving the capture of a defined territory. It will also include the establishment of a Joint Operations Centre at the battalion level for continuous joint operations, the execution of counterterrorism missions such as population control measures, raids, search-and-destroy operations, and the employment of firepower, including air assets, to neutralise terrorists. Special forces from the Army and Air Force, during the Exercise, will secure a helipad for use as a mounting base for further operations. The Exercise will also cover the deployment of drones, counter-UAS measures, and logistics support by the Air Force to sustain forces in hostile areas. Additionally, helicopters will be utilised for reconnaissance and observation, special heliborne operations (SHBO), small team insertion and extraction (STIE) and other associated missions.
Joint Exercise DUSTLIK -VI will enable both sides to share best practices in Tactics, Techniques and Procedures of conducting Joint Sub Conventional operations. It will facilitate developing inter-operability, bonhomie and camaraderie between the two armies. The Joint Exercise will also enhance defence cooperation, further augmenting bilateral relations between the two friendly nations.
****
SC
(Release ID: 2122061) Visitor Counter : 105
LCQ19: Operation of Hong Kong Investment Corporation Limited
Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region
Following is a question by the Hon Adrian Ho and a written reply by the Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury, Mr Christopher Hui, in the Legislative Council today (April 16):
Question:
The Chief Executive announced in the 2022 Policy Address the establishment of the Hong Kong Investment Corporation Limited (HKIC) to be responsible for managing $62 billion of investments. It has been reported that as at March this year, HKIC has invested in about 100 projects at different stages of development. There are views that while HKIC has been in operation for more than two years, there is a lack of transparency as it has yet to disclose detailed information on, among others, the progress of its investments and the remuneration levels of its various senior management staff. This has also aroused concern about whether HKIC can really do a good job in vetting its investments in cutting-edge industries, such as biotechnology, financial technology and big data. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council whether it knows:
(1) the total amount of investments currently managed by HKIC; the respective total expenditure (other than staff remuneration) and total income of HKIC in the past year;
(2) the establishment (including staff at all levels) approved by the Board of Directors of HKIC since its establishment; the total expenditure on the remuneration of its staff and the expenditure on the remuneration of its various senior management staff in the past year;
(3) the composition of the Investment Committee under the Board of Directors of HKIC, the investment experience of its members (e.g. the direct or indirect investment and merger and acquisition projects in which they have taken part, and the corresponding amounts of investments made in such projects), and the respective investment decision-making process of the Investment Committee;
(4) the number of days HKIC has operated since its establishment, the total number of investment projects vetted and screened, and the average number of hours required for vetting and screening an investment project;
(5) among the 100 or so investments made by HKIC, of the names of the enterprises in each investment, industries to which they belong, their nature (that is, whether they are direct or indirect investments), the percentage of shareholding, the projected rate of return on the investments, the investment period, and whether there is any exit mechanism;
(6) given that HKIC will organise the Roundtable for International Sovereign Wealth Funds and the Summit on Start-up Investment and Development in Hong Kong, of the respective estimated expenditure and objectives of these two events; and
(7) whether HKIC has formulated various performance indicators or quantifiable standards (including but not limited to the number of enterprises facilitated to be listed in Hong Kong, the number of new job opportunities, the share of the industries in the Gross Domestic Product, and the definition of reasonable medium-to-long-term financial returns, etc.), so as to achieve the objective of enhancing Hong Kong’s long-term competitiveness and economic vitality?
Reply:
President,
In consultation with the Hong Kong Investment Corporation Limited (HKIC), the reply to the seven parts of the question is as follows:
In the 2022 Policy Address, the Chief Executive announced the establishment of the HKIC to manage a total of HK$62 billion under the Hong Kong Growth Portfolio, Greater Bay Area Investment Fund, Strategic Tech Fund, and Co-Investment Fund. The positioning of the HKIC is to capitalise the power of “Patient Capital” to channel market capital and leverage market resources, with a view to attracting technology enterprises to set up and continue their operations in Hong Kong, thereby accelerating the development of a vibrant strategic industry ecosystem, while seeking a reasonable financial return over the medium to long term.
Investment Work Progress and Due Diligence
Since its establishment, the HKIC has invested in more than 100 projects, including enterprises with cutting-edge technologies or in key industries. These projects are medium-to-long-term investments. Key themes include Hard & Core Technology, Biotechnology and New Energy & Green Technology, with the proportions being 56 per cent, 16 per cent and 11 per cent respectively based on the invested amount.
With the further implementation of the HKIC’s investment, the relevant impact has become increasingly apparent, including (1) further activating the relevant innovation and technology (I&T) ecosystem in Hong Kong, attracting more cutting-edge technology enterprises to set up their operations in Hong Kong or expand their scientific research teams in Hong Kong, enabling Hong Kong-based start-ups to explore and expand into Asian and international markets, and facilitating more cross-sector and cross-industry exchanges between the technology and industry segments; and (2) leveraging market capital to support the development of local technology enterprises.
The HKIC actively collaborates with different investment institutions, jointly making investment with them, and promoting the continuous development and application of cutting-edge technologies in Hong Kong. As of March 2025, every Hong Kong dollar invested by the HKIC has attracted over four Hong Kong dollars from long-term capital in the market for investment. Each of the above projects has on average investment participation from two to three investment institutions.
The HKIC has clear requirements for investee companies to contribute to Hong Kong’s development in a sustainable manner, such as requiring the companies to establish offices in Hong Kong, nurture and attract talents, establish research and development departments and/or corporate venture capital (corporate VC) departments in Hong Kong, and prioritise Hong Kong for their listing. Many investee companies have made good progress in attracting capital and talents as well as exploring new markets, which has accelerated their planning for business development with Hong Kong as the platform. Certain investee companies have submitted their listing applications to the Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited.
In order to maximise the contribution of each investment to Hong Kong and to fully leverage the channelling force of the HKIC’s capital, the HKIC currently focuses on making direct and co-investments. Notwithstanding, having regard to the specific circumstances of each project (including geographical locations, investment themes, financing rounds, legal and compliance considerations), the HKIC will flexibly adopt different strategies, including but not limited to modes of investment such as equity, debt, or a combination of both, as well as different holding arrangements (including structure, holding period, and design of exit clauses).
The HKIC has a robust due diligence and risk assessment mechanism. Drawing reference from the approach adopted by other long-term capital and institutional investors in the market, in addition to its internal team, the HKIC will hire external experts and institutions to support its relevant work when necessary. The time required for reviewing and screening varies for each project having regard to the differences in the specific circumstances of the project. Moreover, all investment projects are reviewed and approved by the Board of Directors (Board) or the Investment Committee under the Board.
Organisational Structure and Governance and Operational Arrangements
The HKIC’s organisational structure and operational arrangements (including budget) are reviewed and approved by the Board. Currently, the HKIC has four major departments, namely the Investment Department, Risk and Compliance Department, Legal Department and Corporate Affairs Department, with a total headcount of 53. With the full commencement of the HKIC’s work, the organisational structure is expected to be further strengthened, particularly on post-investment monitoring and legal areas.
The HKIC reports to its Board on matters relating to its operations and investments. Apart from officials from the relevant government bureaux, the Board also comprises industry leaders from non-official backgrounds, including experts, academics and professionals with specialised technological backgrounds and extensive start-up experience. All investment projects are reviewed and approved by the Board or the Investment Committee under the Board. The Board will continue to review the governance and operational arrangements of the HKIC as and when appropriate, taking into account the direction of investment and the development needs of Hong Kong.
With a view to allowing the public to have a more comprehensive understanding of the HKIC’s operation and business outcomes, the HKIC plans to publish its inaugural annual report in the second half of this year to present the progress of its operation and investment.
Events to Promote Investment
The HKIC is pressing ahead with the organisation of the 2025 Hong Kong Start-up Investment and Development Summit and the International Forum for Patient Capital (Forum). These two events will bring together key stakeholders from I&T field spanning government, industry, academic, research and investment sectors, providing them with a platform to exchange multi-dimensional views regarding topics on I&T, entrepreneurship and venture investment of Hong Kong, with a view to joining hands in building a vibrant ecosystem. In addition, the Forum will invite international “Patient Capital” investment organisations, including sovereign wealth funds, to attend, and encourage them to actively engage in Hong Kong’s financial market and I&T ecosystem. The HKIC is taking forward the preparatory work and will announce the details of the events in due course.
TD urges public to plan their cross-boundary trips in advance during long weekend of Easter holidays
Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region
The Transport Department (TD) announced today (April 16) that it anticipates a large number of passengers and vehicles travelling to and from the Mainland or Macao via various land-based boundary control points (BCPs) during the long weekend of the Easter holidays, especially on the first day (April 18) and the last day (April 21). The TD particularly urges members of the public to plan their trips in advance and allow sufficient travelling time.
For public transport services, the TD has liaised with local and cross-boundary public transport operators to strengthen their services during the long weekend. The waiting time for public transport services, including the Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge (HZMB) shuttle bus (Gold Bus), may be longer. Passengers are encouraged to make their journeys during non-peak hours, maintain order, and heed advice from on-site Police and staff of the public transport operators concerned. Passengers of cross-boundary coaches are also advised to reserve their coach tickets in advance.
Motorists are advised that, subject to actual traffic conditions, special traffic arrangements may be implemented at the Lok Ma Chau Control Point and the Shenzhen Bay Port from April 18 to 21 to allow smooth access for public transport vehicles to the above control points. Cross-boundary private cars may need to queue to cross the BCPs. Motorists should pay extra attention to variable message signs and traffic signs along the roads. They are also requested to be patient in case of traffic congestion and follow the instructions of on-site Police.
For the HZMB, to plan their journeys ahead, the public can make use of the TD’s HKeMobility mobile application to access snapshots of traffic conditions at the inbound and outbound vehicle plazas of the Hong Kong Port. They can also check real-time situations at the vehicle clearance plaza of the Zhuhai Port through the WeChat official accounts “hzmbzhport” or “zhuhaifabu” (traffic-info.gzazhka.com:5015/#/) (Chinese only), and check the forecast of peak hours of inbound and outbound vehicles at the HZMB Zhuhai Port through the WeChat official account of the HZMB integrated information dissemination platform (mp.weixin.qq.com/s/mT9D9et-FybKKXDw9nJ9Dg) (Chinese only). Moreover, motorists are reminded to always comply with the traffic control measures implemented by the Zhuhai authority when driving on the HZMB Main Bridge. Vehicles shall not occupy the emergency lane unless instructed by the Zhuhai authority.
The TD’s Emergency Transport Co-ordination Centre will continue to operate 24 hours to closely monitor the traffic conditions and public transport services of different districts, including various BCPs and major stations. The TD will disseminate the latest traffic information through various channels. Members of the public are advised to check the latest traffic news through radio, television broadcasts, and HKeMobility.
LCQ15: Treatment for depression
Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region
Following is a question by the Hon Chan Pui-leung and a written reply by the Secretary for Health, Professor Lo Chung-mau, in the Legislative Council today (April 16):
Question:
There are views pointing out that patients with depression and treatment-resistant depression (i.e. those who have not shown significant improvement despite two trials of antidepressants at adequate doses, duration and adherence) face higher suicide rates if their condition cannot be controlled, and this will also have far-reaching and adverse impacts on the quality of life for both the patients as well as their families. Therefore, in order to render more effective support for patients with depression and promote mental health for all, it is crucial to provide appropriate treatments for depression and keep track of patients’ data. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
(1) whether it knows the respective numbers of people admitted to public hospitals in each of the past three years due to depression and treatment-resistant depression, and their respective average numbers of days of hospitalisation; if there are no relevant statistics, whether the authorities will track such data in a systematic manner in the future; and
(2) given that in the reply to a question from a Member of this Council on March 13 last year, the authorities indicated that in 2023-2024 (as at the end of February 2024), only 17 patients had been prescribed the nasal spray medication, Esketamine, for treatment of depression, representing a significant disparity compared to the number of patients with depression and potential treatment-resistant depression in Hong Kong, whether the authorities know the reasons for the low usage rate of such medication by the Hospital Authority (HA), and whether the HA will increase the use of nasal spray antidepressants in the future?
Reply:
President,
The reply to the question raised by the Hon Chan Pui-leung is as follows:
(1) The Hospital Authority (HA) adopts an integrated and multi-disciplinary approach in providing mental health services. A team comprising psychiatrists, psychiatric nurses, clinical psychologists, occupational therapists and medical social workers provides a comprehensive range of medical services, including inpatient services, outpatient services, day rehabilitation training and community support services, to patients with mental health needs (including patients with depression) according to their medical conditions and clinical needs.
The table below sets out the number of discharges and deaths of hospitalised patients with principal diagnosis of depression (including treatment-resistant depression) from 2022-23 to 2024-25 (up to December 31, 2024) and their average length of stay in hospitals:
| Year | Inpatients with principal diagnosis of depression (including treatment-resistant depression) | |
| No. of discharges and death of inpatients | Average length of stay in hospitals of inpatients (day) | |
| 2022-23 | 3 279 | 19.9 |
| 2023-24 | 3 589 | 21.0 |
| 2024-25 (up to December 31, 2024) | 2 708 | 21.8 |
Note 1: In the HA, day inpatients refer to those who are admitted to hospitals for non-emergency treatment and discharged within the same day. Inpatients are those who are admitted to hospitals via Accident and Emergency Departments or those who have stayed for more than one day. The calculation of inpatient average length of stay does not include that of day patients.
Note 2: The HA does not maintain statistics relating to treatment-resistant depression.
Note 3: In view of the COVID-19 epidemic outbreak in Hong Kong in early 2020, the HA adjusted its services to cope with the outbreak. This should therefore be taken into consideration when comparing the service capacity of the HA in the respective years. With the subsiding of local COVID-19 epidemic situation and cessation of anti-epidemic measures in early 2023, the HA has been gradually resuming provision of all of its public healthcare services to tie in with the Government’s normalcy measures.
(2) A number of drugs can be used for treatment of depression and different drugs have their efficacy and limitations. Nasal spray antidepressant (Esketamine) is one of the drugs. The nasal spray antidepressant (Esketamine) has been included in the HA Drug Formulary since July 2023.The respective numbers of patients prescribed with nasal spray antidepressant (Esketamine) in the HA in 2023-24 and 2024-25 (projection as at December 31, 2024) were approximately 20.
The HA currently provides drugs, Electroconvulsive Therapy and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the treatment of depression. Healthcare professionals will arrange appropriate treatment to patients with depression according to their medical conditions, clinical needs and risks, as well as taking into the consideration the patients’ preferences. The HA has been expanding the coverage of its Drug Formulary through an established mechanism to provide long-term sustainable, affordable and appropriate support to patients with mental health needs.
The HA will continue to review its mental health services and treatment options (including treatment of depression) according to latest scientific evidence and clinical needs to provide appropriate support to patients in need.
LCQ16: Regulation of disposable plastic products
Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region
LCQ16: Regulation of disposable plastic products
Question:
The first phase regulation of disposable plastic products (the first-phase regulation) officially came into effect on April 22 last year, and the relevant adaptation period ended on October 21 last year. There is a view that although members of the public and the trade have actively co-operated with the first-phase regulation and adopted to non-plastic alternatives, the types of alternatives (e.g. cups, cup lids, food containers and container covers) for some disposable plastic tableware available in the market are still limited, which may hinder the implementation of regulation of disposable plastic products in the next phase. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
(1) how it assesses the specific effectiveness of the first-phase regulation (including the changes in the amount of regulated plastic tableware disposed of and the actual situation of the trade in the adoption of non-plastic alternatives); of the number of complaint cases received by the authorities since the implementation of the first-phase regulation, together with a breakdown by category of case;
(2) whether it has examined the difficulties or technical problems encountered by the catering trade in sourcing or using non-plastic alternatives during the implementation of the first-phase regulation, and the support measures provided by the authorities to assist the trade in responding to this situation;
(3) regarding the second phase regulation of disposable plastic products (the second-phase regulation), of the current state of discussions between the authorities and the trade, in particular on sourcing the relevant non-plastic alternatives, etc; whether the authorities have assessed the difficulties of different trades in adapting to the implementation of the second-phase regulation due to their actual operational needs; and
(4) whether the authorities will consider extending the existing support measures for the trade, such as providing more detailed guidance on alternatives to disposable plastic products or technical advisory services, as well as proactively introducing high-quality non-plastic alternative products, etc, in order to help small and medium-sized restaurants make a smooth transition to the second-phase regulation?
Reply:
President,
To reduce the use of disposable plastic tableware and other plastic products at source with a view to minimising the impact of plastic pollution on the marine environment and human health, the regulation on disposable plastic products (the Regulation) commenced its first phase on April 22, 2024, and the six-month adaptation period ended on October 21, 2024. Since the implementation of the Regulation, the trades have actively complied with the Regulation by stopping the sale or provision of regulated disposable plastic products. The public’s habit of using relevant products in their daily lives has also changed, with “bring your own reusable tableware” and plastic-free cultures being developed gradually in the society, thereby achieving an effective waste reduction goal. The Environmental Protection Department (EPD) will continue to promote going “plastic-and-disposable-free” and join hands with different sectors of the community to promote a culture of green and low-carbon living in Hong Kong.
The reply to the question raised by the Hon Dominic Lee is as follows:
(1) Since the implementation of the Regulation on April 22, 2024, the public and the trades have adapted to the changes in their daily lives and business operations. For example, the number of takeaway customers who do not require disposable tableware has increased significantly compared to before the implementation of the Regulation. Some chain restaurants reported that more than 80 per cent of their customers no longer require takeaway cutlery. It is estimated that, on average, the Regulation can reduce more than 60 million sets of disposable tableware being disposed of in landfills in Hong Kong every year. Overall speaking, the Regulation has been effective in reducing plastic tableware and regulated plastic products from being disposed of in landfills, demonstrating a significant achievement in going “plastic-free”.
After the six-month adaptation period ended on October 21, 2024, as at end March 2025, the EPD received a total of 108 complaints and reports, of which 98 cases involved catering premises providing regulated disposable plastic tableware, while the remaining 10 cases concerned other disposable plastic products. The EPD has investigated the complaint cases and issued written warnings to those with suspected violations, requiring the persons-in-charge to make improvements within 10 working days; otherwise, a fixed penalty notice would be issued. The EPD has followed up all the cases, with 18 catering premises remained persistently incompliant after receiving warnings. The EPD staff have subsequently issued fixed penalty notices of $2,000 to the persons-in-charge.
(2) We understood that during the early stage of implementation of the Regulation, the catering trade required time to source non-plastic alternatives (such as paper straws and paper spoons) that met their operational needs in terms of quality and functionality. As such, the EPD had engaged the Hong Kong Quality Assurance Agency to establish the Green Tableware Platform (the Platform) (www.greentableware.hk
With the Regulation being implemented for nearly a year, the supply of alternatives has become more diverse, and the trades have gradually adapted to the regulatory requirements. We notice a continuous decline in the prices of these alternatives, along with significant improvements in the product quality. The catering trade has also progressively gained understanding and adopted suitable non-plastic alternatives. In addition, the EPD staff will continue to attend the Seminar on Restaurant Licensing regularly organised by the Food and Environmental Hygiene Department to help prospective restaurant operators understand the requirements of the Regulation.
(3) Since March 2025, the EPD has been meeting with various catering trade associations to gather their views and concerns regarding the second phase of the Regulation, as well as to understand the latest development of non-plastic alternatives. While there are currently several alternative options available in the market, the diverse range of food items provided by the catering industry necessitates varying requirements for food containers. The Government will continue to actively collaborate with the suppliers of non-plastic alternatives to explore ways to enhance the quality of their products, meeting the practical needs of the catering trade. To this end, before implementing the second phase of the Regulation, the Government will thoroughly consider the maturity, availability and affordability of the relevant non-plastic alternatives with a view to striking a balance between environmental protection and sustainable development of the trades, and will consider the programme of further regulation in light of the prevailing circumstances.
(4) Referencing the implementation of the first phase of the Regulation, apart from continuing to monitor the market development of alternatives, the EPD is preparing to collaborate with the trades and some large chain restaurant groups and expects to conduct various scenario testing of alternatives in restaurants in mid-2025. We will also continue to review and enhance supporting measures, engage with suppliers to explore further introduction of high-quality and cost-effective non-plastic alternatives, provide references of non-plastic alternatives to the trades through the above-mentioned Green Tableware Platform, and address enquiries from the public and the trades through the EPD hotline at 2838 3111. We will strengthen the relevant supporting efforts in accordance with the needs of the trades.
Through various channels as well as publicity and education activities, the EPD will continue its publicity and education efforts as the main focus, supplementing these efforts with enforcement actions to encourage the public and the trades to participate in “plastic-free” in their daily lives and businesses so as to achieve waste reduction at source.
Issued at HKT 16:08
NNNN
PM shares an article on how Dr. Ambedkar shaped some of India’s earliest and most impactful economic ideas rooted in justice, dignity and self-reliance
Source: Government of India
Posted On: 16 APR 2025 1:33PM by PIB Delhi
The Prime Minister, Shri Narendra Modi today shared an article by Union Minister Shri Arjun Ram Meghwal on how Dr. Ambedkar shaped some of India’s earliest and most impactful economic ideas rooted in justice, dignity and self-reliance.
The Prime Minister’s Office handle on X posted:
“Union Minister Shri @arjunrammeghwal elaborates on how Dr. Ambedkar shaped some of India’s earliest and most impactful economic ideas rooted in justice, dignity and self-reliance.
https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/arjun-ram-meghwal-writes-ambedkar-the-economist-9946393/
via NaMo App”
***
MJPS/SR
(Release ID: 2122045) Visitor Counter : 140